Case law

Clark Construction Group, LLC v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

163 A.3d 768 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 2017

While our review looks at the final order of the CRB, “we cannot ignore the compensation order [of the ALJ] which is the subject of the Board’s review.” Georgetown Univ. Hosp. v. … See Safeway Stores, Inc. v.

Mayo v. Ford

184 A.2d 38 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 1962

See Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Logsdon, D.C.W.D.Ky., 18 F.R.D. 57 . 4 .See Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of City of N. Y., 350 U.S. 551, 557 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 . 5 . Quinn v. … Miles, Fla.App., 124 So.2d 883 ; Harper v. Dupree, 185 Kan. 483 , 345 P.2d 644 ; Boudreaux v. Taylor, Tex.Civ.App., 353 S.W.2d 901 . 6 . See, e. g., Di Giovanni v.

Yarmolinsky v. PERPETUAL AM. FED. S. & L.

451 A.2d 92 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1982

Brown v. Cameron-Brown Co., 92 F.R.D. 32, 37 (E.D. Va.1981); Newberry v. Washington Post Co., 71 F.R.D. 25, 26 (D.D.C.1976). … Altenbach v. Francis Ford, Inc., 17 Fed.R.Serv.2d 321 (D.Ore.1973); see also Gold Strike Stamp Co. v. Christensen, 436 F.2d 791, 795-96 (10th Cir. 1970); Wilensky v.

Jefferson v. United States

474 A.2d 147 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1984

See Commonwealth v. Christina, 481 Pa. 44 , 391 A.2d 1307 (1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 1255 , 59 L.Ed.2d 479 (1979); Wilson v. State, 20 Md.App. 318 , 315 A.2d 788 (1974); Link v. … Brown v. United States, 384 A.2d 647, 651 (D.C.1978).

Hearns v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

704 A.2d 1181 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1997

See Allen v. … Screws v.

District of Columbia v. Thompson

593 A.2d 621 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1991

Co. v. … Bush v.

District of Columbia v. Remi Bamidele

103 A.3d 516 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 13, 2014

Brown v. Argenbright Sec., 782 A.2d 752, 757 (D.C.2001) (internal quotation marks omitted). … See Snow v. Capitol Terrace, Inc., 602 A.2d 121, 127 (D.C.1992); Woodard v. City Stores Co., 334 A.2d 189, 191 (D.C.1975); Darrin v.

Amos v. Shelton

497 A.2d 1082 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1985

Citing Werber v. … E.g., Brown v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 490 A.2d 1125, 1126 (D.C.1985); Wyman v. Roesner, 439 A.2d 516, 519 (D.C.1981). No question of fact is presented in this case.

Butler v. United States

649 A.2d 563 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 1994

Springer, supra, 388 A.2d at 852 ; see also Beard v. United States, 535 A.2d 1373, 1382 (D.C.1988) and German v. … In the second statement, Bush’s reading of the police report indicates that the eye color of the suspects is unknown; later in the tape, Bush says “eyes-brown, ha.”

Fotos v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Washington

533 A.2d 1264 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1987

Williams v. … See Lipman v.

Jeziorski v. Hollod

106 A.2d 698 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 22, 1954

But it was argued before the trial court, as it is here, that appel-lee acted in good faith at all times, and that she was misled into charging these rents by the statement of the clerk at the Rent Control Board that all … II, 45-1611 (a) (3). .See Shenk v. Gaudet, D.C.Mun.App., 83 A.2d 672 .

1111 19th Street Associates v. District of Columbia

521 A.2d 260 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1987

A hearing on the appeal was held before the Board of Equalization and Review on November 19, 1981, at which the District argued that the Board was without jurisdiction to hear the appeal because the assessment had been withdrawn … V 1978)). 6 .

Boykins v. United States

702 A.2d 1242 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 1997

Domeracki v. … See Brown v. United States, 619 A.2d 1180, 1183 (D.C.1992); Comber, 584 A.2d at 48-49 . In this case, Boykins failed to set forth an evidentiary basis for a finding that he was not aware of the risk of harm.

Hearn v. Cross

80 A.2d 285 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1951

We recognize of course that boarding-house accommodations were included in Section 11 of the Rent Act, Code 1940, Supp. … McLean v. Jephson, 123 N.Y. 142 , 25 N.E. 409 , Annotation 9 L.R.A. 493 . See Doolan v. Carr, 125 U.S. 618 , 8 S.Ct. 1228 , 31 L.Ed. 844 . 3 . Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Ass’n v.

Peters v. Riggs National Bank, N.A.

942 A.2d 1163 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 2008

In Brown v. Cash Mgmt. Trust of Am., 963 F.Supp. 504, 504-05 (D.Md.1997) (applying N.Y. law), the U.S. … In Mac v.

Sanchez v. United States

919 A.2d 1148 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 2007

See, e.g., Brown v. United States, 627 A.2d 499, 508 (D.C.1993) (“[A] defendant may not take one position at trial and a contradictory position on appeal.”). … Anderson v. United States, 481 A.2d 1299, 1300-01 (D.C.1984).

McClary v. United States

3 A.3d 346 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 2010

Sherer v. United States, 470 A.2d 732, 737 (D.C.1983) (citing Brown v. United States, 409 A.2d 1093, 1099 (D.C.1979)). … See Guzman v. United States, 769 A.2d 785, 790 (D.C.2001) (citing Brown v. United States, 683 A.2d 118, 124 (D.C.1996)).

Geiger v. Crestar Bank

778 A.2d 1085 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 23, 2001

See also Kiley v. … [the underlying] legislation should be accepted by the courts, as should the Board’s interpretation of its own regulation’ ”); (referencing Ford Motor Credit Co. v.

Whiteru v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 2025

See Szymkowicz v. … See also Sabo v.

Palacio-Escoto v. United States

764 A.2d 795 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 2001

The judge elaborated: I will incarcerate you [under] the Youth Act which means an indeterminate sentence, one that I establish a maximum for but leave to the District of Columbia Parol[e] Board, and I suppose ultimately the … Clark v. United States, 416 A.2d 717, 719 (D.C.1980). “The actual duration of the treatment period is determined by the Youth Correction authorities.” Dorszynski v.