Case law

Delany v. Murphy

338 A.2d 432 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1975

United States v. Schaefer Brewing Co., 366 U.S. 227 , 78 S.Ct. 674 , 2 L.Ed.2d 721 (1958). 4 . United States v. Crow, Pope & Land Enterprises, Inc., 340 F.Supp. 25, 36 (D.C.Ga. 1972); Cass v. … Brown, 41 F.R.D. 284, 287 (D.C.Colo.1966). 5 . Jordan v. Group Health Ass’n, 71 App.D.C. 38, 47 , 107 E.2d 239, 248 (1939). 6 . Anderson v. Group Hospitalization, Inc., D.C.App., 203 A.2d 421, 423 (1964). 7 .

Block v. Davis

97 A.2d 105 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 21, 1953

The record does not identify Miss Wilkins, but we take judicial notice she is not an officer of the court, but is a social welfare consultant employed by the Board of Public Welfare for service in connection with the landlord … If the rent and payment figures are correct, the balance was $61. .Merriam v. Sugrue, D.C.Mun.App., 41 A. 2d 166 ; Carow v. Bishop, D.C.Mun.App., 50 A.2d 598 .

Washington v. United States

594 A.2d 1050 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1991

In Morgan v. … See United States v.

Ransom v. United States

947 A.2d 1127 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 1, 2008

United States v. … Compare United States v.

Simpson v. United States

877 A.2d 1045 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 2005

The first witness, Harold Hymes-Brown (Hymes), testified that he saw Simpson “pull[ ] out his gun” and fire it at the decedent. … See Murray v. United States, 855 A.2d 1126, 1133 (D.C.2004); Foreman v. United States, 792 A.2d 1043, 1050-51 (D.C.2002); Mercer, 724 A.2d at 1184 .

Capitol Entertainment Services, Inc. v. McCormick

25 A.3d 19 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 2011

Instead, it directs the District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board to “add to its rules and regulations specific examples of behavior that constitute misconduct within the meaning of this subsection.” 5 The Board … .”); Chase v.

1111 19th Street Associates v. District of Columbia

521 A.2d 260 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1987

A hearing on the appeal was held before the Board of Equalization and Review on November 19, 1981, at which the District argued that the Board was without jurisdiction to hear the appeal because the assessment had been withdrawn … V 1978)). 6 .

Miller v. United States

444 A.2d 13 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1982

The description she gave to police just after the incident, was that the robber was a black male, around 19 or 20 years old, six feet tall and thin, wearing blue jeans, a brown skull cap, and a green jacket. 3 Two days later … Taylor v. United States, 134 U.S.App.D.C. 188 , 413 F.2d 1095 (1969); Harris v. United states, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 105 , 402 F.2d 656 (1968). 6 .

Fredericks v. United States

306 A.2d 268 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1973

Harris v. United States, 112 U.S. App.D.C. 100, 299 F.2d 931 (1962). … United States v. Harris, 141 U.S.App.D.C. 253, 258 , 437 F.2d 686, 691 (1970). Cf. Adams v. United States, D.C.App., 302 A.2d 232 (March 20, 1973).

Hinkle v. Sam Blanken & Co., Inc.

507 A.2d 1046 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1986

See, e.g., Pollock v. Brown, 395 A.2d 50, 52 (D.C.1978). … Haynes v.

Fotos v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Washington

533 A.2d 1264 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1987

Williams v. … See Lipman v.

Davis v. District of Columbia

102 A.2d 842 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 1954

The Senate Report also contained a letter from the President, Board of Commissioners, District of 'Columbia, which stated: “Under existing law the court has jurisdiction in a paternity case only when the mother is a legal … See cases cited in Dicks v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 72 A.2d 34, n. 4 . See also State v. Tetreault, 97 N.H. 260 , 85 A. 2d 386 ; In re Zimmer, 64 N.D. 410 , 253 N.W. 749 .

Darby v. Freedman's Savings & Trust Co.

10 D.C. 349 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1881

The rule in a court of equity, where the wife executes a security for the indebtedness of the husband, is explained to some extent in the case of Huntington v. Huntington, 2 Brown’s P. … (Clark v. Hawkins, 5 R. I., 219; Aldrich v. Campbell, 4 Gray, 284 ; Fennell v. Nesbit, 16 B. Monroe, 551; Morrow v. Bright, 20 Miss., 298 .) Thus, in Marks v. Baker, 1 W. C.

Butler v. United States

649 A.2d 563 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 1994

Springer, supra, 388 A.2d at 852 ; see also Beard v. United States, 535 A.2d 1373, 1382 (D.C.1988) and German v. … In the second statement, Bush’s reading of the police report indicates that the eye color of the suspects is unknown; later in the tape, Bush says “eyes-brown, ha.”

Reid v. Belt

109 A.2d 137 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1954

See Belt v. Hamilton Nat. Bank, D.C.D.C., 108 F.Supp. 689 , affirmed Hamilton Nat. Bank v. Belt, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 168 , 210 F.2d 706 . . Morgan v. Kraft, 52 App.D.C. 172 , 285 F. 906 . . Woodmen of the World v. … S. v. Kit. D.C.E.D.Pa., 22 F.Supp. 1022 . . Municipal Court Rule 8(f). . Howells State Bank v. Novotny, 8 Cir., 69 F.2d 32 .

Yarmolinsky v. PERPETUAL AM. FED. S. & L.

451 A.2d 92 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1982

Brown v. Cameron-Brown Co., 92 F.R.D. 32, 37 (E.D. Va.1981); Newberry v. Washington Post Co., 71 F.R.D. 25, 26 (D.D.C.1976). … Altenbach v. Francis Ford, Inc., 17 Fed.R.Serv.2d 321 (D.Ore.1973); see also Gold Strike Stamp Co. v. Christensen, 436 F.2d 791, 795-96 (10th Cir. 1970); Wilensky v.

Garrison v. D. C. Transit System, Inc.

196 A.2d 924 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1964

Schneider v. D. C. Transit System, Inc., D.C.D.C., 188 F.Supp. 786, 787 . … KLM, etc. v. Tuller, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 282 , 292 F.2d 775 , cert. denied 368 U.S. 921 , 82 S.Ct. 243 , 7 L.Ed.2d 136 .

Jefferson v. United States

474 A.2d 147 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1984

See Commonwealth v. Christina, 481 Pa. 44 , 391 A.2d 1307 (1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 1255 , 59 L.Ed.2d 479 (1979); Wilson v. State, 20 Md.App. 318 , 315 A.2d 788 (1974); Link v. … Brown v. United States, 384 A.2d 647, 651 (D.C.1978).

Amos v. Shelton

497 A.2d 1082 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1985

Citing Werber v. … E.g., Brown v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 490 A.2d 1125, 1126 (D.C.1985); Wyman v. Roesner, 439 A.2d 516, 519 (D.C.1981). No question of fact is presented in this case.

Strother v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

499 A.2d 1225 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1985

We observe that the regulatory scheme for ex-servicemembers differs from that for other federal employees, such as the applicant in Smith v. … District Unemployment Compensation Board, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 361 , 435 F.2d 433 (1970) (findings of the federal employing agency concerning the reason for termination not conclusive upon state agency unless applicant had opportunity