Case law

Thompson v. Lee

589 A.2d 406 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1991

Brown, Inc. v. … Brown, Inc. v. Moylan, 509 A.2d at 99 . III.

In Re JT

290 A.2d 821 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 12, 1972

Id. at 150 n. 14, 88 S.Ct. at 1448 . [9] Pee v. United States, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 47, 49 , 274 F.2d 556, 558 (1959); Brown v. … White v. Reid, 125 F.Supp. 647, 649 (D.D.C. 1954). See also Brown v. United States, supra . [13] See note 7, supra. [14] In Kent v.

Palacio-Escoto v. United States

764 A.2d 795 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 2001

The judge elaborated: I will incarcerate you [under] the Youth Act which means an indeterminate sentence, one that I establish a maximum for but leave to the District of Columbia Parol[e] Board, and I suppose ultimately the … Clark v. United States, 416 A.2d 717, 719 (D.C.1980). “The actual duration of the treatment period is determined by the Youth Correction authorities.” Dorszynski v.

Peoples Life Ins. v. Goffs

34 A.2d 468 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1943

Eureka Life Insurance Co. v. Hawkins, 39 App.D.C. 329 ; Provident Life Ins. Co. v. Grant, D.C.Mun.App., 31 A.2d 885 . Home Beneficial Ass’n v. … Lomax, 55 App.D.C. 210 , 4 F.2d 292 ; United States Skipping Board Merchant Fleet Corporation v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 68 App.D.C. 366 , 98 F.2d 238 . Home Beneficial Ass'n v. Lomax, supra. Pisker v.

D.C. Library Renaissance Project/West End Library Advisory Group v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission

73 A.3d 107 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 2013

Co. v. … See Anne Arundel Cnty., 316 A.2d at 821 (historic preservation not traditional zoning subject); Board of Supervisors v.

In re K.M.T.

795 A.2d 688 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2002

See, e.g., District of Columbia v. Walker, 689 A.2d 40 , 42 n. 2 (D.C.1997); Ramos v. United States, 569 A.2d 158 , 162 n. 5 (D.C.1990); Trustees of the Puritan Church v. United States, 111 U.S.App. … See District of Columbia v. Tschudin, 390 A.2d 986 (D.C.1978); Seaboard & Western Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 86 U.S.App. D.C. 9, 11, 181 F.2d 777, 779 (1949). . See In re D.M., 771 A.2d at 365-366 .

Hartman v. Hazen

2 D.C. 166 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1935

Therefore it was the duty of plaintiff to avail himself of this administrative remedy before bringing suit in court—Hegeman Farms Corp. v. Baldwin, 293 U. S. 163, 172 ; Chicago Elc. Ry. Co. v. Risty, 276 U. … Co. v. Tax Comm., 266 U. S. 265 ; Goldsmith v. Board of Tax App., 270 U. S. 123 ; U. S. ex rel. Connor v. District of Columbia, 61 App. D. C. 288.

Mayo v. Ford

184 A.2d 38 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 1962

See Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Logsdon, D.C.W.D.Ky., 18 F.R.D. 57 . 4 .See Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of City of N. Y., 350 U.S. 551, 557 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 . 5 . Quinn v. … Miles, Fla.App., 124 So.2d 883 ; Harper v. Dupree, 185 Kan. 483 , 345 P.2d 644 ; Boudreaux v. Taylor, Tex.Civ.App., 353 S.W.2d 901 . 6 . See, e. g., Di Giovanni v.

Schachter v. Singer

45 A.2d 364 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 1946

In a later case, Hicks v. … Slattery, 302 U.S. 300 , 58 S.Ct. 199 , 82 L.Ed. 276 ; Braniff Airways v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 79 U.S.App. D.C. 341, 147 F.2d 152 ;. Yankee Network v.

Hinkle v. Sam Blanken & Co., Inc.

507 A.2d 1046 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1986

See, e.g., Pollock v. Brown, 395 A.2d 50, 52 (D.C.1978). … Haynes v.

United States v. Taylor

49 A.3d 818 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 2012

Joseph v. United States, 926 A.2d 1156, 1160 (D.C.2007) (“The court’s legal conclusions on Fourth Amendment issues ... are ‘subject to de novo review.’ ” (quoting Brown v. … .”); People v.

Clark Construction Group, LLC v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

163 A.3d 768 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 2017

While our review looks at the final order of the CRB, “we cannot ignore the compensation order [of the ALJ] which is the subject of the Board’s review.” Georgetown Univ. Hosp. v. … See Safeway Stores, Inc. v.

Van-Pak, Inc. v. Cavalier Storage Corp.

208 A.2d 620 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1965

Great Northern Ry. v. … In Hart v.

Stone v. Alexander

6 A.3d 847 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 2010

or officer or governing board of a health-care facility or agency....” … Sullivan v. Yellow Cab Co., 212 A.2d 616, 618 (D.C.1965). 12 . E.g., Mandes v. Miagett, 49 App.

Madison v. United States

512 A.2d 279 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 1986

Arrington v. … He relies on Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 602 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2261 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975) and United States v. Gayden, 492 A.2d 868, 875 (D.C.1985).

Darby v. Freedman's Savings & Trust Co.

10 D.C. 349 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1881

The rule in a court of equity, where the wife executes a security for the indebtedness of the husband, is explained to some extent in the case of Huntington v. Huntington, 2 Brown’s P. … (Clark v. Hawkins, 5 R. I., 219; Aldrich v. Campbell, 4 Gray, 284 ; Fennell v. Nesbit, 16 B. Monroe, 551; Morrow v. Bright, 20 Miss., 298 .) Thus, in Marks v. Baker, 1 W. C.

Hoard v. Heath

266 A.2d 926 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1970

Blakey v. Board of Commissioners, D.C.Mun.App., 177 A.2d 269 (1962). Our review of the record shows the findings were clearly supported by substantial evidence, 3 and the order is Affirmed. .

DeWITT v. District of Columbia

43 A.3d 291 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 10, 2012

Sanders v. … Brown v. United States, 627 A.2d 499, 508 (D.C.1993) ("[A] defendant may not take one position at trial and a contradictory position on appeal.”); see also Mason v.

Colbert v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 2023

Brown-Carson v. D.C. Dep’t of Emp. Servs., 159 A.3d 303, 307 (D.C. 2017); see also Mayberry v. … Gilliam v.

Pye v. Loewinger

912 A.2d 1198 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2006

See Richardson v. … Rearden v.