Case law

Watergate Improvement Associates v. Public Service Commission

326 A.2d 778 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 23, 1974

See, e. g., Goodman v. Public Service Commission, D.C.App., 309 A.2d 97, 100 (1973); Telephone Users Ass’n v. … Civil Aeronautics Board, 495 F.2d 145, 152 (D.C.Cir.1974), as follows: In reviewing the Board’s action, we are bound by the Board’s findings of fact if supported by substantial evidence. . . .

Spackman v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

590 A.2d 515 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 8, 1991

E.g., Ahmed v. District of Columbia Hackers License Appeal Board, 501 A.2d 415, 416 (D.C.1985); Perkins v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services, 482 A.2d 401, 402 (D.C.1984). … E.g., Giles v. Shell Oil Corp., 487 A.2d 610, 611 (D.C.1985).

District of Columbia v. Stewart

278 A.2d 117 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1971

For similar authority in other jurisdictions, see State v. Metrusky, 140 Conn. 26 , 97 A.2d 574 (1953); Knackstedt v. Dept. of Mental Health, 69 Ill.App.2d 98 , 216 N.E.2d 517 (1966). See also E. … V, 1966). Another related provision, D.C. Code 1961, § 32-406, provided in part:

Ross v. Fierro

659 A.2d 234 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1995

Tucker v. Brown, 199 Wash. 320 , 92 P.2d 221, 225 (1939). In the absence of such a written release or its equivalent, the claim that Fierro received a gift must fail as a matter of law. 7 IV. … Brown v.

Strother v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

499 A.2d 1225 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1985

We observe that the regulatory scheme for ex-servicemembers differs from that for other federal employees, such as the applicant in Smith v. … District Unemployment Compensation Board, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 361 , 435 F.2d 433 (1970) (findings of the federal employing agency concerning the reason for termination not conclusive upon state agency unless applicant had opportunity

In re Mack

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 25, 2023

A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (Bar Registration No. 204149) On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility … not later than 30 days after the issuance of this opinion and will provide Disciplinary Counsel with proof of attendance at the CLE within 30 days; and  4 (v)

Hill v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DOES

717 A.2d 909 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1998

See Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 320 A.2d 282, 287 (D.C.1974). Therefore, in the absence of exceptional circumstances, we will not entertain a claim that was not raised before the agency. … Glenbrook Road Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 605 A.2d 22, 33 (D.C.1992).

Adkins & Ainley, Inc. v. Busada

270 A.2d 135 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1970

Ainley, the chairman of appellant’s board, whom he had known for years. In the ensuing conversation, Busada threatened to cancel all other policies he “had with him.” … Shea v. Jackson, D.C.App., 245 A.2d 120, 121 (1968).

Johnson v. United States

387 A.2d 1108 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1978

See United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 435-36 (1973); United States v. Boone, 177 U.S.App.D.C. 265, 266 , 543 F.2d 412, 413 (1976). … See United States v. Gallo, 177 U.S.App.D.C. 214, 217-18 , 543 F.2d 361, 364-65 (1976). See also United States v.

Thompson v. Lee

589 A.2d 406 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1991

Brown, Inc. v. … Brown, Inc. v. Moylan, 509 A.2d at 99 . III.

Washington Hospital Center v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

746 A.2d 278 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 20, 2000

Area Transit Auth. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 506 A.2d 1127, 1130 (D.C.1986) (emphasis added); Ferreira v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 531 A.2d 651, 656 (D.C.1987). … v.

Mesa v. United States

875 A.2d 79 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 12, 2005

Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C.1991) (citing Lawrence v. United States, 566 A.2d 57, 60 (D.C.1989)). … In Barrera v.

Gilmore v. United States

699 A.2d 1130 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 1997

Brown, 333 U.S. 18, 27 , 68 S.Ct. 376, 381 , 92 L.Ed. 442 (1948) (“No rule of construction necessitates our acceptance of an interpretation resulting in patently absurd consequences”); Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. … See Holiday v.

Winters v. United States

317 A.2d 530 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1974

Huffman v. United States, 297 F.2d 754, 758 (5th Cir. 1962) (Brown, J., dissenting). … Brown, 94 Idaho 352 , 487 P.2d 946 (1971) (court prefers that instruction he given&long with others prior to deliberations) ; State v.

In re D.W.

989 A.2d 196 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 2010

Brown, 441 F.3d 1330, 1349 (11th Cir.2006) (“Accordingly, we conclude that Brown was not in custody when he first confessed to robbing and murdering Gaglia, he was not entitled to Miranda warnings, and the statements need … Dyson v.

Turner v. Day

461 A.2d 697 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 11, 1983

Henderson v. … See Brown v. Nat’l Permanent Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 221 U.S.App.D.C. 125 , 683 F.2d 444 (1982) (per curiam).

Pye v. Loewinger

912 A.2d 1198 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2006

See Richardson v. … Rearden v.

Bolton v. Bernabei & Katz, PLLC

954 A.2d 953 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 2008

Peters v. … One month later, Bolton's attorney wrote: "My client chooses the DC fee arbitration board as required in the fee agreement.” 7 .

Stone v. Alexander

6 A.3d 847 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 2010

or officer or governing board of a health-care facility or agency....” … Sullivan v. Yellow Cab Co., 212 A.2d 616, 618 (D.C.1965). 12 . E.g., Mandes v. Miagett, 49 App.

DeWITT v. District of Columbia

43 A.3d 291 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 10, 2012

Sanders v. … Brown v. United States, 627 A.2d 499, 508 (D.C.1993) ("[A] defendant may not take one position at trial and a contradictory position on appeal.”); see also Mason v.