Case law

Nelson v. District of Columbia

772 A.2d 1154 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 2001

In Kelly v. Parents United for the District of Columbia Pub. … See Gilmore v. Board of Trustees of the Univ. of the District of Columbia, 695 A.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C.1997). Affirmed. .

Franklin v. Phoenix

294 A.2d 483 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1972

Neale v. Neale, 76 U.S. (9 Wall.) 1 , 19 L.Ed. 590, 592 (1870). See also Mackall v. Mackall, 135 U.S. 167 , 10 S.Ct. 705 , 34 L.Ed. 84 (1890); Brown v. Sutton, 129 U.S. 238 , 9 S.Ct. 273 , 32 L.Ed. 664 (1889); 38 C.J.S. … V, 1972).

Fairmac Corp. v. Roberts

67 A.2d 684 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 1949

Rockcliffe Realty Corporation v. Bowles, Em.App., 151 F.2d 339 ; Kuskin & Rotberg, Inc., v. Porter, Em.App., 153 F.2d 1016 ; Longmoor Corporation v. Creedon, Em.App., 162 F.2d 747 . … Northwood Apartments, Inc., v. Brown, Em.App., 137 F.2d 809 ; Bibb Mfg. Co. v. Bowles, Em.App., 140 F.2d 459 .

DC Public Schools v. DOES / Kimberly Tomlin

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2018

THOMPSON, Associate Judge: Petitioner District of Columbia Public Schools (“DCPS”) seeks review of a Compensation Review Board (the “CRB” or the “Board”) decision affirming a February 17, 2017, compensation order … “[W]e review the decision of the Board,” but in doing so, “we cannot ignore the compensation order which is the subject of the Board’s review.” WMATA v.

Waters v. Castillo

755 A.2d 478 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 2000

Lennon v. … Brown v. Hartshorne Pub. School Dist., 926 F.2d 959, 961 (10th Cir.1991) (emphasis in original); see Commercial Space Management Co. v. Boeing, 193 F.3d 1074 , 1076 (9th Cir.1999).

Dodson v. Washington Automotive Co.

461 A.2d 1020 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 16, 1983

Appellees rely primarily on the case of Rodriguez v. … Caldwell v. Ogden Sea Transport Inc., 618 F.2d 1037 (1980).

In Re Wasser

977 A.2d 931 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 2009

ORDER PER CURIAM: On consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent with Maryland Bar Counsel, see Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Nathan H. … Wasser, 407 Md. 230 , 964 A.2d 209 (2009), the order of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see In re Nathan Harold Wasser, VSB Docket N. 09-000-078453

Washington Chapter of the American Institute of Architects v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

594 A.2d 83 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 1991

Gunty v. … Citizens Ass’n, 402 A.2d at 42 (quoting Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 293 A.2d 470, 473 (D.C.1972)).

Valois, Inc. v. Thorne

86 A.2d 530 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 1952

Plaintiff proved that by unanimous approval of its board of directors the corporate officers were authorized to terminate the lease of defendant, Ruth Thorne, because of her default in payments under her lease. … Klepinger v. Rhodes, 1944, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 340 , 140 F.2d 697 , certiorari denied 322 U.S. 734 . See also Paley v. Solomon, D.C.D.C., 59 F.Supp. 887 ; Ridgley v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 45 A.2d 475 ; Psarakis v.

Carrollsburg v. Anderson

791 A.2d 54 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 2002

In Taylor v. Eureka Inv. … Kline v.

J. H. Marshall & Associates, Inc. v. Burleson

313 A.2d 587 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 1973

This court in discussing the equitable powers of the trial court before the Court Reform Act said in Brown v. … Yellowitz , according to Marshall, narrows the scope of permissive counterclaims against an as-signee across the board. However, the holding in that case is clearly limited.

Siler v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

525 A.2d 620 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 18, 1987

Jennings v. Gilberston, 74 A.2d 839, 841 (D.C.1950) (failure to exhaust not excused where “petitioner offers no reason at all for his failure to seek [an intra-agency] review”). … See Malcolm Price, Inc. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 350 A.2d 730, 733-34 (D.C.1976). Moreover, the judicial review available in accordance with D.C.

Washington Gas Light Co. v. Public Service Commission

450 A.2d 1187 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 1982

See Metropolitan Washington Board of Trade v. Public Service Commission, supra at 358-59. … Metropolitan Washington Board of Trade v. Public Service Commission, supra at 350.

Hood v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 2022

United States v. … United States v.

Murville v. Murville

433 A.2d 1106 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 1981

Therefore, the trial court was permitted, within the considerable discretion allowed to it in controlling cross-examination, see Brown v. … We held in Pryor v.

Henry v. United States

754 A.2d 926 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 2000

See Blanton v. … See Brown v.

Diamond v. Davis

680 A.2d 364 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 1996

Brown v. … Brown v.

Robinson v. Robinson

629 A.2d 562 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 1993

See Nevarez v. Nevarez, 626 A.2d 867 , 870 n. 6 (D.C.1993); Graham v. Graham, 597 A.2d 355 , 357 & n. 6 (D.C.1991). … This court invalidated the guideline adopted by the Board of Judges of the Superior Court in Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 566 A.2d 719 (D.C.1989).

Cosio v. United States

927 A.2d 1106 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2007

Bullock v. … See Mindombe v.

Wright v. Thomas D. Walsh, Inc.

856 A.2d 1108 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2004

Brown v. Horn-stein, 669 A.2d 139, 141 (D.C.1996); see De Foe v. … See Cobb v.