Case law

District of Columbia v. Simpkins

720 A.2d 894 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1998

See District of Columbia v. Thompson, 570 A.2d 277, 293 (D.C.1990); 6 see also Goggins v. … Hoddes, 265 A.2d 302, 303 (D.C.1970) (absolute privilege for report required by law to be filed with unemployment compensation board).

Young v. U-Haul Co. of D.C.

11 A.3d 247 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 2011

Herbert v. … Gilmore v. United States, 699 A.2d 1130, 1132 (D.C.1997) (citing United States v. Brown, 333 U.S. 18, 27 , 68 S.Ct. 376 , 92 L.Ed. 442 (1948)).

Grier v. Rowland

409 A.2d 205 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1979

See Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 313 , 70 S.Ct. 652 , 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950) (due process requires notice and an opportunity to be heard); Societe Internationale v. … Pollack v. Brown, D.C.App., 395 A.2d 50 (1978); Koppal v. Travelers Indemnity Co., D.C.App., 297 A.2d 337 (1972). 2 .

Hollywood Credit Clothing Co., Inc. v. Jones

117 A.2d 226 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1955

Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Yellow Taxi Corp., N. Y. City Municipal Court, 1935, 154 Misc. 440 , 277 N.Y.S. 468 ; Grostein v. Blumenberg Dairy Corp., N. Y. … Carpenter v. Delage, Columbia County Court, 1944, 49 N.Y. S.2d 702; Orgurchak v. Merrill, App.Term, Supreme Court, 1942, 178 Misc. 872 , 36 N.Y.S.2d 29 . We are strengthened in our position by what was said in Clark v.

Frazier v. Center Motors, Inc.

418 A.2d 1018 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 19, 1980

To accomplish its stated purpose, Congress delegated broad authority to the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate regulations necessary to render the Act effective, and also to monitor its operation. See Mourning v. … See, e. g., Carney v.

Ausbrooks v. Ausbrooks

493 A.2d 324 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1985

FTC v. Browning, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 292 , 295-96 n. 7, 435 F.2d 96 , 99-100 n. 7 (1970); Stevens v. Sparks, 205 Va. 128, 134 , 135 S.E.2d 140, 145 (1964); cf. Clark v. … Commonwealth v. Wheeler, 274 Pa.Super. 478, 481 , 418 A.2d 506, 508 (1980).

Harris v. United States

602 A.2d 154 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1992

After Wallace agreed to the purchase price, Harris removed a tin foil packet from a brown paper bag and gave the packet to Wallace. … An officer searched the area where Harris had been standing and found a brown paper bag containing three additional packets of marijuana treated with PCP.

Pellerin v. 1915 16th Street, N.W., Cooperative Ass'n

900 A.2d 683 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 2006

LaPrade v. Rosinsky, 882 A.2d 192, 196 (D.C.2005); see Celotex Corp. v. … Section 9 authorizes the Association’s Board to terminate a member for failure to pay maintenance charges; provided, however, that before the Board shall have the power to repurchase the certificate of one judged unfit for

Hill v. D.C. Department of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 2022

v. … In reviewing the conclusions of the CRB we apply the same standard as the Board — substantial evidence review.

Long v. DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES

717 A.2d 329 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 1998

Coumaris v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 660 A.2d 896, 899-900 (D.C.1995). … Zenian v. District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals, 598 A.2d 1161, 1166 (D.C.1991) (footnote omitted); see Mushroom Transportation v.

Thoubboron v. Ford Motor Co.

809 A.2d 1204 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 2002

Moore, Jr. and his law firm Moore & Brown (“appellants”) appear before this court in their third appeal, arising from a proposed class action against appellee Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) involving breach of warranty claims … Duffy, supra, 218 F.3d at 626-27 ; McGregor v. Board of Comm’rs, 956 F.2d 1017, 1021 (11th Cir. 1992); Mortgage Guar.

Riskin v. Green

138 A.2d 813 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1958

Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, 3 Ill.2d 254 , 120 N.E.2d 649 , certiorari denied Edwards v. Barkhausen, 348 U.S. 897 , 75 S.Ct. 218 , 99 L.Ed. 205 ; Larner-Diener Realty Co. v. Fredman, Mo., 266 S.W.2d 689 ; Dorsey v. … See also Stearns v. Formant, D.C.Cir., 249 F.2d 527 . . Cf. Brown v. Coates, D.C.Cir., 253 F.2d 36 .

In re Hernandez

683 A.2d 764 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 1996

The Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that respondent be disbarred pursuant to D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1995 Repl.), in light of his conviction in the Municipal Court of the State of California, State v.

Structural Preservation Systems, Inc. v. Petty

927 A.2d 1069 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2007

Patel v. … Brown v. Best Foods, 169 F.R.D. 385, 389 (N.D.Ala.1996) (quoting Wreath v. United States, 161 F.R.D. 448, 450 (D.Kan.1995), and also citing Patel, supra, 984 F.2d at 218 ).

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

981 A.2d 1216 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 2009

Ruiz, Associate Judge: Petitioner seeks reversal of a decision of the Compensation Review Board (CRB) of the D.C. … See Millhouse v. WMATA (Millhouse III), No. 06-085, slip op. at 7 (Compensation Review Board July 20, 2007), available at 2007 DC Wrk. Comp. LEXIS 293, 2007 WL 2350166 .

Hill v. D.C. Department of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 2022

v. … In reviewing the conclusions of the CRB we apply the same standard as the Board — substantial evidence review.

McCullough v. United States

827 A.2d 48 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 2003

. *54 On May 17, 1997, Jose Brown was beaten and strangled in a parking lot in Northwest, Washington, D.C. … See section V, infra.

Johnson v. United States

610 A.2d 729 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1992

See, e.g., Pounds v. United States, 529 A.2d 791, 793-794 (D.C.1987); Adams v. … See Brown v. United States, 576 A.2d 731 (D.C.1990). We affirm the order denying the motion to vacate sentence under D.C.Code § 23-110. Affirmed on the merits, remanded in •part with directions. .

Walter Blair, II v. DC & Thaddeus Modlin, Jr.

190 A.3d 212 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 2018

Co. v. … v.

Curtis v. United States

568 A.2d 1074 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1990

While it has been held that in a prosecution for mayhem a showing of specific intent is not essential, Brown v. … In Wynn v.