Case law

Smith v. United States

318 A.2d 891 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1974

Adams v. United States, D.C.App., 302 A.2d 232 (1973). … Brown v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 134 , 375 F.2d 310 (1966), cert. denied, 388 U.S. 915 , 87 S.Ct. 2133 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1359 (1967); Smith v.

Monday v. United States

76 A.2d 68 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1950

verdict of the jury. 1 Another assignment of error relates to the exclusion of two documents: appellant’s application for a New York marriage license in August 1949, excluded on ground of remoteness, and a report of the Board … Co. v. Watson, 190 U.S. 287 , 23 S.Ct. 681 , 47 L.Ed. 1057 , and Le Cointe v. United States, 7 App.D.C. 16 . 2 . See Boorstein v. Douglas, D.C.Mun.App., 52 A.2d 492 . 3 .

In re E. G. C.

373 A.2d 903 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 19, 1977

See United States v. Brown, 155 U.S.App.D.C. 177 , 476 F.2d 933 (1973). He was entitled to file a motion based on newly discovered evidence under Super. … Manago v. United States, D.C.App., 331 A.2d 335 (1975); Patterson v. United States, D.C.App., 301 A.2d 67 (1973).

In Re Antioch University

482 A.2d 133 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 1984

District of Columbia, 436 A.2d 1299 (D.C.1981); Bay General Industries, Inc. v. Johnson, 418 A.2d 1050 (D.C.1980); Trilon Plaza Co. v. Allstate Leasing Corp., supra. … Moreover, in Cahn v.

In Re Rice

217 A.2d 596 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 1966

A docket entry by the trial judge on April 14, 1965, corrected by him on July 13, 1965, states that “ * * * [t]he Court conferred with Detective Bonaccorsy of the Metropolitan Police Sex Squad, Detective Stanley Brown of … Cooper v. District of Columbia, 363 U.S. 847 , 80 S.Ct. 1620 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1730 (1960).

In re Gardner

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 2022

Gardner’s argument that courts should be subject to deadlines enforced with financial penalties.  17 Superior Court Board of Judges assisted by its Rules Committee, see Moghalu v … As we explained in Vining v.

Communications Workers v. District of Columbia Commission on Human Rights

367 A.2d 149 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1976

See Batiste v. Furnco Construction Corp., 503 F.2d 447 (7th Cir. 1974); Cooper v. Philip Morris, Inc., 464 F.2d 9 (6th Cir. 1972); Voutsis v. Union Carbide Corp., 452 F.2d 889, 893-94 (2d Cir. 1971). … The findings must support the end result in a discernible manner [Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 293 A.2d 470, 473 (D.C.App.1972); citations omitted.]

Olevsky v. District of Columbia

548 A.2d 78 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1988

Basically, Warren claimed, with the support of an investigator for the Wage and Hour Board (the Board) for some of his contentions, that he had not been paid all of the wages to which he was entitled, and that he had been … dismissed in reprisal for making a complaint to the Board.

Burleson v. United States

306 A.2d 659 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1973

See, for example, United States v. Robinson, 475 F.2d 376 (D.C.Cir., 1973), where gun was obtained from wife of accused and later accused admitted ownership; United States v. Trantham, 145 U. … See Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973). 4 . Mitchell v. United States, 110 U.S.App. D.C. 322, 328, 293 F.2d 161, 167 (1961). 5 . 7 Wigmore on Evidence § 2129 (3d ed. 1940).

In Re Page

956 A.2d 683 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 2008

On further consideration of the certified copy of the order from the Court of Appeals of Maryland suspending respondent by consent, see Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Md. v. … Page, 402 Md. 688 , 939 A.2d 116 (2008), this court’s February 13, 2008, order that suspended respondent from the practice of law pending further action of the court, the July 17, 2008, Report and Recommendation of the Board

Smith v. Worksman

99 A.2d 712 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1953

McChesney v. … New Orleans Flour Inspectors v. Glover, 160 Ü.S. 170, 16 S.Ct. 321 , 40 L.Ed. 382 ; Wikel v. Board of Com’rs of Jackson County, 120 N.C. 451 , 27 S.E. 117 ; Campbell v. Shelby County, 147 Ala. 703 , 41 So. 407 . 3 .

Brooks v. United States

683 A.2d 1369 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1995

Appellant’s claim that the trial court erred in conducting an in camera review contradicts the position appellant took in his post-trial motion for discovery. 6 See Brown v. … See Larrison v. United States, 24 F.2d 82, 87-88 (7th Cir.1928). See also United States v.

Joiner v. United States

585 A.2d 176 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1991

Entsminger threw the board at Lopez’ feet and began to run as Diaz and Lopez chased him. … In Ladner v.

Miller v. Fleming

18 D.C. 139 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1889

property was conveyed in trust for *144 the settlor and her heirs, until her marriage, then to her use for life, then to transfer the property to her children, if any, and if none, then to transfer the same in like manner v/ … Brown, 1 Mac Arthur, chiefly on the authority of Poor vs. Considine, 6 Wall., 458 . In Haw vs.

Young v. United States

284 A.2d 671 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1971

Appellant cites Townsley v. … See Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 261 A.2d 834, 835 (1970).

Campbell v. United States

174 A.2d 87 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 1961

Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 510 , 67 S.Ct. 385, 393 , 91 L.Ed. 451, 402 . 3 . See Abel v. United States, 362 U.S. 217 , 80 S.Ct. 683 , 4 L.Ed.2d 668 ; Ellison v. United States, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 206 F.2d 476 . … Cf., Williams v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 170 A.2d 233 .

Taylor v. Yellow Cab Co.

31 A.2d 683 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1943

See Ray v. Carr, 71 App.D.C. 37 , 107 F.2d 238 . Avery v. Alabama, 308 U.S. 444 , 60 S.Ct. 321 , 84 L.Ed. 377 ; Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. L. … See, also, Donovan v. Brown et al., 75 U.S.App.D.C. 93 , 124 F.2d 295 .

District of Columbia v. Chambers

965 A.2d 5 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2009

Brown v. National Acad. of Scis., 844 A.2d 1113, 1117 (D.C.2004); Railan v. Katyal, 766 A.2d 998, 1006 (D.C.2001). 11 . Railan, supra note 10 , 766 A.2d at 1006 (quoting Super. Ct. Civ. R. 50). 12 . … Brown, supra note 10 , 844 A.2d at 1118 (quoting Homan v. Goyal, 711 A.2d 812, 817 (D.C.1998)). 13 . Wilson v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., 912 A.2d 1186, 1188 (D.C.2006) (quoting Doe v.

Young v. Scales

873 A.2d 337 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 2005

Brown v. United States, 619 A.2d 1180, 1182 (D.C.1992). The right of self-defense “arises only when the necessity begins, and equally ends with the necessity .... ” Binion v. … Brown, 619 A.2d at 1182 . In order to claim self-defense, a defendant “must do everything in his power, consistent with his safety, to avoid the danger and avoid the necessity of taking life.

Moore v. United States

428 A.2d 364 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1981

Moore v. United States, D.C.App., 387 A.2d 714 (1978). … Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 244 A.2d 487 (1968). This record demonstrates no abuse of discretion in denying a continuance. Appellant proffered no testimony relevant to the issue before the court.