Case law

Carleton v. Winter

901 A.2d 174 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 2006

See Columbia Plaza Tenants’ Ass’n v. Columbia Plaza Ltd. P’ship, 869 A.2d 329, 332 (D.C.2005) (summary judgment); Brown v. Nat’l Acad, of Sciences, 844 A.2d 1113, 1117-18 (D.C.2004) (judgment as a matter of law). … See also Adloo v. H.T.

Moss v. United States

250 A.2d 567 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 1969

As stated in Gordon v. … United States, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 215 , 392 F.2d 820 (1968); Brooke v. United States, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 19 , 385 F.2d 279 (1967); Hood v. United States, supra n. 6; Brown v.

Swisher v. United States

572 A.2d 85 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1990

In re Brown, 320 A.2d 92, 94 (D.C.1974) (emphasis added). … Brown v. District of Columbia, 252 A.2d 513, 516 (D.C.1969); see also Thompson v. Thompson, 559 A.2d 311, 315 (D.C.1989). In principle, this case is quite similar to Brown.

Matter of LM

432 A.2d 692 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 4, 1981

In District of Columbia v. … United States, 327 F.2d 639 (9th Cir. 1964); Rogers v. United States, 326 F.2d 56 (10th Cir. 1963); Carter v. United States, 113 U.S.App. D.C. 123, 306 F.2d 283 (1962); Cunningham v.

James M. Schools v. United States

84 A.3d 503 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 2013

McDaniel v. Brown, 558 U.S. 120, 133, 130 S.Ct. 665 , 175 L.Ed.2d 582 (2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Curry v.

Bowser v. Dupont East Civic Action Assoc. Dupont East Civic Action Assoc. v. D.C. Office of Planning

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 2023

See Friends of McMillan Park v. D.C. … Preservation League v. Dep’t of Consumer & Regul.

Carter v. United States

643 A.2d 348 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1994

In Hoffman v. … In Minnesota v.

Potts v. Potts

171 A.2d 263 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1961

. * * * Now, Congress repealed the proviso that a legal separation from bed and board may be granted for drunkenness. … See Schreiber v. Schreiber, D.C.Mun.App., 139 A.2d 278 .

In re J.M.

596 A.2d 961 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 1991

In Johnson v. … As the hour became late, police in every city down the line could board the bus and wake the uncooperative passenger. United States v. Cothran, 729 P.Supp. 153, 156 (D.D.C.1990) (Gesell, J.), rev’d sub nom.

Phillip O. Battle v. DOES / WMATA

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 2018

Hosp. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 916 A.2d 149, 151 (D.C. 2007) (quoting Mills v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 838 A.2d 325, 328 (D.C. 2003), and Dietrich v. … See Olson v.

Bowman v. Cobb

650 A.2d 198 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1994

United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 , 68 S.Ct. 525, 542 , 92 L.Ed. 746 (1948). … Womack v. United States, 350 A.2d 381, 383 (D.C.1976).

Glaziers' Local Union No. 963 of Brotherhood of Painters v. Rawley

248 A.2d 188 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 1968

This authority is delegated under Section 44(a) to the General President, subject to the approval of the General Executive Board. … United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. McLain, D.C.App., 46 A.2d 373 (1946). . Article XVIII, Section 7(e), supra note 3.

Henneke v. Sommer

431 A.2d 6 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 13, 1981

National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc., 427 U.S. 639 , 96 S.Ct. 2778 , 49 L.Ed.2d 747 (1976); Himmelfarb v. Greenspoon, D.C.App., 411 A.2d 979 (1980); Corley v. … BP Oil Corp., D.C.App., 402 A.2d 1258 (1979); Pollock v. Brown, D.C.App., 395 A.2d 50 (1978).

Woods v. United States

987 A.2d 451 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 21, 2010

See Lazo v. United States, 930 A.2d 183, 185 (D.C.2007); Brown v. … Brown, supra, 932 A.2d at 525 . By admitting the plea agreement, the jury could consider all the facts underlying Harris’ testimony and make its own credibility determinations. Id.

Gustin v. Stegall

347 A.2d 917 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 11, 1975

Brown v. Brown, D.C.App., 343 A.2d 59 (1975). See also Schanck v. Jones, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 148, 229 F.2d 31 (1956); Brewood v. Cook, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 386 , 207 F.2d 439 (1953). … Dahlke, 158 Neb. 39 , 62 N.W.2d 252 (1954); Konecny v. von Gunten, 151 Colo. 376 , 379 P.2d 158 (1963); Panushka v. Panushka, 221 Or. 145 , 349 P. 2d 450 (1960). 13 . Watson v.

Rosexpress, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

602 A.2d 659 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1992

Levy v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 570 A.2d 739, 746 (D.C.1990) (citations omitted); see Perkins v. … See Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 377 A.2d 436, 439 (D.C. 1977); D.C.Code § l-1510(a)(3)(E) (1987). We agree.

Webb v. D.C. Dep't of Emp't Servs.

204 A.3d 843 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 2019

Webb v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department , Compensation Review Board Decision and Order, March 1, 2017 (hereinafter, "CRB Order"), App. at 10-17. … Webb v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department , CRB No. 17-047, Compensation Review Board Decision and Order, July 20, 2017 (hereinafter, "CRB Decision and Order"), App. at 24-28, and Webb v.

Wis. Ave. Associates v. 2720 Wis. Ave., Etc.

441 A.2d 956 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 1982

On the date on which those agreements were signed, Cooperative's board of directors consisted of defendants Laurins, Norman, Baden, Chasen, and Tompkins. … The trial court found that the promoter, defendant Laurins, dominated the boards of directors and that the other board members viewed themselves as employees of Laurin and had no concept of their roles as officers and directors

Taylor v. Yellow Cab Co.

31 A.2d 683 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1943

See Ray v. Carr, 71 App.D.C. 37 , 107 F.2d 238 . Avery v. Alabama, 308 U.S. 444 , 60 S.Ct. 321 , 84 L.Ed. 377 ; Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. L. … See, also, Donovan v. Brown et al., 75 U.S.App.D.C. 93 , 124 F.2d 295 .

Kreuger v. Coe

1 D.C. 44 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1933

S. 4915), Pitman v. Coe, Commissioner, App. D. C., decided December 11, 1933. The claims were, as a matter of fact, presented in the Patent Office, and were passed upon by that office. Lucke v. Coe, Commissioner, App. … The board held that such claims were “quite specific” to plaintiff’s device, and the court agrees with that conclusion.