Case law

Conner v. 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue Associates, L.P.

669 A.2d 693 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 1995

The court correctly found that Conner had satisfied the requirements for quantum meruit payments we laid out in Brown v. … Brown, 524 A.2d 1184 (D.C.1987), and Waco Scaffold & Shoring Co. v. 425 Eye Street Assocs., 355 A.2d 780 (D.C.1976).

Green v. United States

440 A.2d 1005 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1982

See Tabron v. … Williams v.

Bennett v. United States

797 A.2d 1251 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 16, 2002

Ede-len v. … See, e.g., Brown v. United States, 683 A.2d 118 , 127 n. 10 (D.C.1996). Our articulation in Brown applies to this case a fortiori.

Lipphard v. Humphrey

28 App. D.C. 355 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1906

Shanks v. Christopher, 3 A. K. Marsh, 144; Boyd v. Cook, 3 Leigh, 32 , 51; Hoshauer v. Hoshauer, 26 Pa. 404, 406 ; Vernon v. Kirk, 30 Pa. 218, 224 ; King *361 v. Kinsey, 74 N. C. 261, 263 ; Guthrie v. … Price, 23 Ark. 396, 407 ; Clifton v. Murray, 7 Ga. 564 , 50 Am. Dec. 411 ; Doran v. Mullen, 78 Ill. 342, 346 ; Browning v. Budd, 6 Moore, P. C. C. 430, 435.

Plummer v. United States

983 A.2d 323 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 2009

And, in Brown v. … Brown, at 642. 18 . Arguably, there is support for Mr. Plum-mer's futility argument in case law pertaining to the somewhat analogous ripeness doctrine and administrative futility. See Anaheim Gardens v.

Winthrop v. D. C. Transit System, Inc.

293 A.2d 283 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 1972

Pertinent testimony on liability was that as appellant (plaintiff) was attempting to board appellee’s bus the driver closed the front doors on her right hand and started to pull away from the bus stop. … In a similar case, Guenther v.

Washington Gas Light Co. v. Public Service Commission

508 A.2d 930 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 9, 1986

Metropolitan Washington Board of Trade v. Public Service Commission, 432 A.2d 343, 347 (D.C.1981) (footnote omitted). In this case the Commission captioned Order No. 8005 as a “Final Opinion and Order.” … Civil Aeronautics Board, 173 U.S.App.D.C. 1, 18 , 522 F.2d 107, 124 (1975) (en banc) (footnote omitted), it is nevertheless “persuasive.” Metropolitan Washington Board of Trade, supra, 432 A.2d at 349 n. 11.

Jones v. United States

548 A.2d 35 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 1988

Frye v. United States, 54 App.D.C. 46, 47 , 293 F. 1013, 1014 (1923); see also Ibn-Tamas, 407 A.2d at 638 ; Brown v. United States, 384 A.2d 647, 650 (D.C.1978). … Brown, 557 F.2d 541, 557 (6th Cir.1977); see generally Giannelli, The Admissibility of Novel Scientific Evidence: Frye v.

District of Columbia v. Bryant

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 2024

(alteration in original) (quoting Brown v. AVEMCO Inv. Corp., 603 F.2d 1367, 1371 (9th Cir. 1979))). We also reject Mr. … Brown, 115 P.3d 139, 143 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005))), vacated in part on other grounds sub nom United States v. Lewis, 107 A.3d 603 (D.C. 2015), aff’d en banc on other grounds, 147 A.3d 236 (D.C. 2016).

Vincent v. United States

58 A.2d 829 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1948

Stoner v. Underseth, 85 Mont. 11 , 277 P. 437 ; Marshall v. Public Service Commission, 129 Pa.Super. 272 , 195 A. 475 . State v. Rosenstein, 217 Iowa 985 , 252 N.W. 251 ; Stoner v. Underseth, supra. Morton v. … Corporation v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380 , 68 S.Ct. 1 ; United States ex rel. Brown v. Lederer, 7 Cir., 140 F.2d 136 , certiorari denied 322 U.S. 734 , 64 S.Ct. 1047 , 88 L.Ed. 1568 ; Martin v.

Parks v. United States

451 A.2d 591 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 1982

When O’Connor arrived on the scene, he found Brown dead, and her brother and her sixteen-year-old son, Marvin Young, in the room with the body. The brother told O’Connor that John Fulton had shot Brown. … See Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 383 A.2d 1082, 1085 (1978) (considering promptness of objection in determining prejudice). Cf. Cohoon v.

Black v. United States

810 A.2d 410 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 2002

of cocaine, which, he explained, he had purchased from the man who fled. *412 ANALYSIS The question of whether police had a reasonable, articulable suspicion sufficient to justify an investigatory stop is one of law, see Brown … v.

Anthony v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

485 A.2d 605 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1984

.; see Hockaday v. … Dunn, supra, 467 A.2d at 967 (quoting Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 294 A.2d 177, 179 (D.C.1972)). .

Evans v. Prentice

79 A.2d 396 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1951

Custer v. Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., D.C.Mun.App., 43 A.2d 716, 717 . 2 . Oscanyon v. Winchester Repeating Arms Company, 103 U.S. 261 , 26 L.Ed. 539 ; Brown v. District of Columbia, 29 App. … D.C. 273 , 25 L.R.A.,N.S., 98; Hornblower v. George Washington University, 31 App.D.C. 64 ; Smith v. O’Brien, 66 App.D.C. 387 , 88 F.2d 769 ; Niosi v. Aiello, D.C.Mun.App., 69 A.2d 57 . 3 . See Anacostia Bank v.

Matter of TM

577 A.2d 1149 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 1990

Curry v. United States, 520 A.2d 255, 263 (D.C.1987). Rather, the government must establish that appellants knew of the location of the cocaine and that they exercised dominion and control over it. Brown v. … Brown, supra, 546 A.2d at 394 n. 2 (quoting standardized jury instruction); United States v.

In Re Estate of Monge

841 A.2d 769 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 2004

The majority has broadly interpreted District of Columbia v. … The majority also cites commentary from Sackett, Chapman, Brown & Cross v. Osgood, 80 U.S.App. D.C. 99, 149 F.2d 825 (1945).

United Services Life Ins. Co. v. Ringsdorf

91 A.2d 717 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 1952

Capital Transit Co., 69 App.D.C. 147 , 99 F.2d S80, certiorari denied, 306 U.S. 630 , 59 S.Ct. 464 , 83 L.Ed. 1032 ; Bell v. Brown, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 5 , 128 F.2d 317 ; Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. … Turner v. Hertz, 55 App.D.C. 177 , 3 F.2d 348 , 39 A.L.R. 1140 ; Friedman v. Thomas J. Fisher & Co., D.C.Mun.App., 88 A.2d 321 ; Arsenault v. Angle, D.C.Mun.App., 43 A.2d 709 . Cf. Bovello v.

United States v. Powell

563 A.2d 1086 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 1989

See, e.g., Culp v. United States, 486 A.2d 1174, 1177 (D.C.1985) (boarded-up windows put public on notice that intruders were not welcome in unoccupied house); Carson v. … His decision was later “supported” by WMATA’s Board of Directors, although Mr. Cooksey did not know whether the Board took a formal vote on the matter. No public hearings were held before the gates were erected. 4 .

Johnson v. Leuthongchak

772 A.2d 249 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 10, 2001

Williams v. Brown, 860 S.W.2d 854, 856 (Tenn.1993) (citations omitted). … See Knight v.

Webb v. D.C. Dep't of Emp't Servs.

204 A.3d 843 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 2019

Webb v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department , Compensation Review Board Decision and Order, March 1, 2017 (hereinafter, "CRB Order"), App. at 10-17. … Webb v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department , CRB No. 17-047, Compensation Review Board Decision and Order, July 20, 2017 (hereinafter, "CRB Decision and Order"), App. at 24-28, and Webb v.