Case law

Wagshal v. District of Columbia

430 A.2d 524 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1981

PER CURIAM: Appellant unsuccessfully challenged a realty tax assessment before the District of Columbia Board of Equalization and Review. … In Abbott Construction Co. v.

Calhoun v. United States

369 A.2d 605 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1977

Albany was in front, holding a pistol, and Calhoun followed, holding a brown paper bag under his arm. … In Arnold v.

Howard v. United States

452 A.2d 966 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 1982

In Robertson v. … Brown v. United States, D.C. App., 409 A.2d 1093 (1979). We find no abuse of discretion in this trial court ruling. See Hardy v. United States, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 253, 254 , 335 F.2d 288, 289 (1964). 2 .

Hardy v. United States

316 A.2d 867 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1974

Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 274 A.2d 683 (1971); Pendergrast v. United States, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 20 , 27, 416 F.2d 776, 783 , cert. denied, 395 U.S. 926 , 89 S.Ct. 1782 , 23 L.Ed.2d 243 (1969). … Savage v. United States, supra; Banks v. United States, supra. In United States v.

Proctor v. Ward

83 A.2d 281 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 1951

McChesney v. Moore, D.C.Mun.App., 78 A.2d 389 . 2 . Swan v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 40 N. D. 258 , 168 N.W. 657 , L.R.A.1918F, 1063; Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. … Pearson v. O’Connor, D.C.D.C., 8 F.R.D. 432 ; Italian Star Line, Inc., v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 2 Cir., 53 F.2d 359 , 80 A.L.R. 576 ; Bartlett v.

Kirkpatrick v. District of Columbia Public Schools

786 A.2d 586 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 2001

See also Coumaris v. … However, it is unclear what the Board’s regulation means in this context.

Olden v. United States

781 A.2d 740 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 2001

Carey v. Crane Serv. Co., 457 A.2d 1102, 1108 (D.C.1983). … This analysis is consistent with that of Palacio-Escoto v.

Scott v. United States

898 A.2d 899 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 11, 2006

See generally United States v. … See generally Brown v.

Von Blaine v. Saunders

80 A.2d 52 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1951

Davis v. Brown, 94 U.S. 423 , 24 L.Ed. 204 ; Cafritz Const. Co. v. Mudrick, 61 App.D.C. 189 , 59 F.2d 864 ; Baucom v. Friend, D.C.Mun.App., 52 A.2d 123 . 3 . … Code 1940, § 28-613; Code 1940, 28-721; Portsmouth Savings Bank v. Wilson, 5 App.D.C. 8 ; Spragins v. McCaleb, 237 Ala. 658 , 188 So. 251 ; Krenerick v. Horton, 254 Mich. 12 , 235 N.W. 810 ; Central Nat.

In re T.T.C.

583 A.2d 986 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1990

When the passenger alighted, the officer saw a greenish weed on the right front seat and numerous brown envelopes on the rear seat. … See also Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 52 , 99 S.Ct. 2637, 2641 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979).

Atkinson v. United States

366 A.2d 450 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1976

Brown v. … Machibroda v. United States, supra 368 U.S. at 495 , 82 S.Ct. 510 ; White v. United States, D.C.App., 358 A.2d 645 (1976); Bettis v. United States, supra; Angarano v. United States, supra; Thompson v.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Bell

632 A.2d 414 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1993

In Kaufman v. … See also Miller v.

In re Fultz

9 F. Cas. 998 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1853

by such board, it shall be in their power, or a majority of them, to reverse the decision of the Commissioner either in whole or in part, ’ ’ &c. … Chief Justice Marshall, in the case of Davis v.

Martin v. State of Maryland

287 A.2d 823 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1972

Brown v. Ward, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 220 , 275 F.2d 884 (1960); Bruzaud v. Matthews, supra. … Vitiello v. Flood, supra, 374 F.2d at 557 .]

Washington Gas Light Co. v. Public Service Commission

508 A.2d 930 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 9, 1986

Metropolitan Washington Board of Trade v. Public Service Commission, 432 A.2d 343, 347 (D.C.1981) (footnote omitted). In this case the Commission captioned Order No. 8005 as a “Final Opinion and Order.” … Civil Aeronautics Board, 173 U.S.App.D.C. 1, 18 , 522 F.2d 107, 124 (1975) (en banc) (footnote omitted), it is nevertheless “persuasive.” Metropolitan Washington Board of Trade, supra, 432 A.2d at 349 n. 11.

McCoy v. United States

760 A.2d 164 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 2000

To the extent that prior precedents, (e.g., Brown v. United States, 409 A.2d 1093 (D.C.1979) and Beale v. … Brown v. United States, 627 A.2d 499, 508 (D.C. 1993) (citation omitted). We will not consider such claims on appeal. Where a party does not object during trial, we review for plain error. Handon v.

McFerguson v. United States

770 A.2d 66 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 2001

See Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C.1991). 13 . … United States, 592 A.2d 1021, 1023-24 (D.C.1991) (no reasonable suspicion; scanty description and 15 minute delay in arrival of police); Brown v.

Dent v. United States

404 A.2d 165 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 1979

Brown v. United States, 134 U.S.App.D.C. 269, 271 , 414 F.2d 1165, 1167 (1969). See Coombs v. United States, supra at 1316. … Brown v. United States, supra, 134 U.S.App.D.C. at 270 -71 n.2, 414 F.2d at 1166 -67 n.2. See Morton v.

Brannon v. United States

43 A.3d 936 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 17, 2012

Cullen v. United States, 886 A.2d 870, 873 (D.C.2005) (quoting Spain v. United States, 665 A.2d 658, 661 (D.C.1995)). … Brown v. United States, 584 A.2d 537, 539 (D.C.1990).

D.D. v. M.T.

550 A.2d 37 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 8, 1988

Woolfolk v. Brown, 358 F.Supp. 524, 534 (E.D.Va.1973), related order af f'd in part and rev’d in part on other grounds, 538 F.2d 598 (4th Cir.1976). … Regal Knitwear Co. v. Labor Board, supra, 324 U.S. at 15 , 65 S.Ct. at 481 . The order in the present case effectively invited the mother to seek a “further order of court” in an eventuality such as the one which arose.