Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdc

7,092 results

1.72s

  • Kleiman v. Kleiman

    633 A.2d 1378 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1993

    See Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., 453 A.2d 110, 111 (D.C.1982). … Brown v. Brown, 343 A.2d 59, 61-62 (D.C.1975); Schanck v. Jones, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 148, 149 , 229 F.2d 31, 32 (1956). 9 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Hamilton National Bank of Washington

    109 A.2d 135 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 1954

    Sherrill v. Cole, 144 Okl. 301 , 291 P. 54, 55 . 2 This exception was recognized in Davis v. … See also Automobile Financing, Inc., v. Tatum, 56 Ga.App. 270 , 192 S.E. 538; Brown v. Guaranty Securities Co., Tex.Com.App., 265 S.W. 547 ; City Savings & Trust Co. v. Peck, 92 Vt. 310 , 103 A. 1020 ; First Nat.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • William McCorkle and Andre Clinkscale v. United States

    100 A.3d 116 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 2014

    See, e.g., Holmes v. … v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Allen v. United States

    579 A.2d 225 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1990

    Brown, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 190, 194 , 490 F.2d 758, 762 (1973). . … Brown, supra, 160 U.S.App.D.C. at 207 , 490 F.2d at 775 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Charmed LLC v. DC DOH

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 2021

    Smith v. District 4 The language of the relevant regulation, 22-C D.C.M.R. § 9900, was amended on March 3, 2021, to replace references to DOH with references to the “Board.” … See Baldwin v. District of Columbia Off. of Emp. Appeals, 226 A.3d 1140, 1144 (D.C. 2020) (affirming based on the Board’s alternative ruling); Fogo De Chao (Holdings) Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hamel v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

    487 A.2d 603 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 1985

    Von Stauffenberg v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 104, 107 , 459 F.2d 1128, 1131 (1972). … District Unemployment Compensation Board, 381 A.2d 619, 623 (D.C.1977); General Railway Signal Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mourning v. APCOA Standard Parking, Inc.

    828 A.2d 165 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 2003

    Co. v. Brown, 593 A.2d 184, 185 (D.C.1991)). … See Panici v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Adams v. Dodson

    106 A.2d 501 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1954

    . - Whatever may have been the agreement, the lawyer prepared an application for correction of military record, which the client signed and the lawyer filed with the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. … change of position by the Comptroller General following the Supreme Court’s denial of petition for writ of certiorari, 345 U.S. 994 , 73 S.Ct. 1135 , 97 L.Ed. 1401 , to review the decision by the Court of Claims in Ramsey v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lassiter v. District of Columbia

    447 A.2d 456 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1982

    Ross v. … Palma v. Powers, 295 F.Supp. 924, 933 (N.D.Ill.1969); accord, Montana v. United States, 440 U.S. 147, 153 , 99 S.Ct. 970, 973 , 59 L.Ed.2d 210 (1959); Cromwell v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Harper v. District of Columbia Committee on Admissions

    375 A.2d 25 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1977

    Richardson v. McFadden, 540 F.2d 744 (4th Cir. 1976) (South Carolina); Feldman v. State Board of Law Examiners, 438 F.2d 699 (8th Cir. 1971) (Arkansas); Chaney v. … See Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957); Whitfield v. Illinois Board of Law Examiners, 504 F.2d 474 (7th Cir. 1974); Pettit v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Murray v. District of Columbia Dep't of Youth and Rehabilitation Services

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 2025

    Lasheka Brown filed a statement in lieu of brief for appellee District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals. … Johnson v. D.C. Off. of Emp. Appeals, 912 A.2d 1181, 1183 (D.C. 2006) (internal quotation marks omitted). Although we generally review questions of law de novo, Dupree v. D.C. Off. of Emp.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re an Inquiry into Allegations of Misconduct Against Juveniles Detained at & Committed at Cedar Knoll Institution

    430 A.2d 1087 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 12, 1981

    Parole Board proceeding no longer held in jurisdiction). … See Brown v. Yeldell, 159 U.S.App.D.C. 339 , 487 F.2d 1210 (1973); Creek v. Stone, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 329 , 379 F.2d 106 (1967) (per curiam); Clayton v. Stone, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 181 , 358 F.2d 548 (1966); Elmore v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Shellie v. United States

    277 A.2d 288 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1971

    Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57 , 44 S.Ct. 445 , 68 L.Ed. 898 (1924); Lee v. United States, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 156 , 221 F.2d 29 (1954); Burton v. … Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 261 A.2d 834 (1970).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Nikeesha Webb v. DC DOES

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2019

    Webb v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department, Compensation Review Board Decision and Order, March 1, 2017 (hereinafter, “CRB Order”), App. at 10- 17. … Webb v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department, CRB No. 17-047, Compensation Review Board Decision and Order, July 20, 2017 (hereinafter, “CRB Decision and Order”), App. at 24-28, and Webb v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Burgess v. United States

    608 A.2d 733 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 5, 1992

    Delaplane, 778 F.2d 570, 574 (10th Cir.1985) (statement in telephone conversation “Michael’s back” admissible under present sense impression), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 827 , 107 S.Ct. 104 , 93 L.Ed.2d 54 (1986); Brown v. … See Laumer, supra, 409 A.2d at 200 (look to indicia of trustworthiness); Brown v. Tard, supra, 552 F.Supp. at 1351 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Freeman v. United States

    391 A.2d 239 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1978

    HARRIS, Associate Judge: In a jury trial appellant was convicted of assault with a dangerous weapon (a board). D.C.Code 1973, § 22-502. … Barker v. Wingo, supra, at 531, 92 S.Ct. at 2192 ; Reed v. United States, supra, at 319; United States v. Bolden, supra, at 628.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Interstate Restaurants, Inc. v. Halsa Corporation

    309 A.2d 108 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1973

    A special meeting of Interstate’s Board of Directors was held on October 27, four days before the ten days expired. … Mun.App., 61 A.2d 616 (1948) ; Price v. Wilson, D.C.Mun.App., 32 A.2d 109 (1943). . United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36 , 71 S.Ct. 104 , 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950) ; Atkins v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Fiske v. England

    243 A.2d 682 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1968

    Glover v. England, D.C.Mun.App., 151 A.2d 199 (1959); Lambert v. Board of Commissioners etc., D.C.Mun.App., 116 A.2d 926 (1955); Chappelle v. Board of Commissioners etc., D.C.Mun.App., 110 A.2d 697 (1955); cf. … Ritch v. Director of Vehicles and Traffic, surpa, 124 A.2d at 303 . See generally Hyser v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • DeLevay v. District of Columbia Rental Accommodations Commission

    411 A.2d 354 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1980

    Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C. App., 320 A.2d 282, 287 (1974); John D. Neumann Properties, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Appeal and Review, D.C. … Compare Ammerman v. D. C.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Cantor v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.

    474 A.2d 839 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1984

    The trial court found that Piedmont’s liability was limited to $750 — a sum which appellant has already received — by a tariff which the airline previously filed with the Civil Aeronautics Board (C.A.B.) pursuant to the Federal … Radinsky v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.