Case law

District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Central Labor Council

445 A.2d 960 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 1982

The United States Court of Appeals for *961 the circuit in which the injury occurred had jurisdiction to review final orders of the Benefits Review Board. Id, § 921(c).

Bridges v. United States

381 A.2d 1073 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1977

Tinsley v. United States, supra at 533. … [Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 349 A.2d 467, 468 (1975).] We therefore conclude that appellant’s argument regarding his identification is lacking in merit.

Thompson v. District of Columbia

978 A.2d 1240 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 3, 2009

District of Columbia v. … See also McManus v.

Peter Minshall v. DC Dept. of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

184 A.3d 352 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 17, 2018

Basken v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 946 A.2d 356, 366 (D.C. 2008). … See Montgomery County v. Longo, 975 A.2d 312, 330 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2009).

In Re Lambert

86 A.2d 411 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1952

In a proceeding in the Juvenile Court two infant children were found to be without adequate parental care 1 and they were committed to the Board of Public Welfare. … Thomas v. United States, 74 App.D.C. 167 , 121 F.2d 905 ; In re Stuart, 72 App. D.O. 389, 114 E.2d 825; Bule v. Geddes, 23 App.D.C. 31 . See also Wissenberg v.

Cox v. United States

898 A.2d 376 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 4, 2006

See, e.g., Puma v. Sullivan, 746 A.2d 871, 876 (D.C.2000). … See Reed v. United States, 452 A.2d 1173, 1180-81 (D.C.1982); Rease v. United States, 403 A.2d 322, 327 (D.C.1979).

Johnson v. Johnson Publishing Co.

271 A.2d 696 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1970

Co. v. … Brown v. Shimabukuro, 73 App.D.C. 194 , 118 F.2d 17 (1941) ; Young v. Young, 57 App.D.C. 157 , 18 F.2d 807 (1927). 8 . Cf. American Dist. Tel. Co. v. Brink’s Inc., 380 F.2d 131 (7th Cir.1967).

District of Columbia v. Davis

685 A.2d 389 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1996

Davis petitioned the trial court for review of the decision of the full OEA Board on June 23, 1994. … Wilson v. District of Columbia, 675 A.2d 28, 29 (D.C.1996) (quoting L enkin Co. Management v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Comm’n, 642 A.2d 1282, 1285 (D.C.1994)).

Sturdivant v. Seaboard Service System, Ltd.

459 A.2d 1058 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1983

Super.Ct.Civ.R. 56(c); Johnson v. Weinberg, 434 A.2d 404, 407 (D.C.1981); Maddox v. … Brown v. Collins, 131 U.S. App.D.C. 68, 71, 402 F.2d 209, 212 (1968). Appellant argues that the hearing was less than “judicial” and therefore a qualified not an absolute privilege attaches to Ms.

York Apartments Tenants Ass'n v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission

856 A.2d 1079 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 2004

As we have repeatedly held, “[w]hat matters here [] is not when the order became ‘final’ under the Board’s rules, but when it became reviewable.” Jackson v. District of Columbia Employees’ Comp. … Lujan v.

District of Columbia v. Singleton

81 A.2d 335 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1951

In Clark v. … Co. v. United States, 2 Cir., 206 F. 443, 445 .

Ringgold v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

531 A.2d 241 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 1987

Cicala v. Disability Review Board for Prince George’s County, 288 Md. 254, 261-65 , 418 A.2d 205, 211 (1980). … See generally Rhema Christian Center v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 515 A.2d 189 (D.C.1986). 4 . The DOES argues on appeal that the Maryland findings must be given preclusive effect under Decius v.

Manago v. United States

331 A.2d 335 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 20, 1975

In the vacant building, the officers also found another man, the codefendant at trial, lying on top of a brown coat upon which were various items of jewelry as well as some tools. … See State v. Rouse, 206 S.E.2d 873 (S.C.1974); State v. Bickham, 239 La. 1094 , 121 So.2d 207, 213 (1960). See also United States v.

In Matter of Kelley

433 A.2d 704 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 13, 1981

Dionisio, 410 U.S. 1 , 93 S.Ct. 764 , 35 L.Ed.2d 67 (1973), and United States v. Mara, 410 U.S. 19 , 93 S.Ct. 774 , 35 L.Ed.2d 99 (1973). … See Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 384 A.2d 647 (1978). It should also be noted that the language quoted in Part I from United States v.

In re L.A.V.

578 A.2d 708 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 1990

See Brown v. United States, 546 A.2d 390, 394 (D.C.1988). There was no evidence that L.A.V. had actual possession of the gun. … See Wesley v.

Karl W. Corby Co. v. Zimmer

99 A.2d 485 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1953

In Bailey v. … Tauber v. Rochelsky, 90 Misc. 382 , 153 N.Y.S. 199 ; Schick v. Fleischhauer, 26 App.Div. 210 , 49 N.Y.S. 962 ; Brown v. Webster Realty Co., 146 A. 671 , 7 N.J. Misc. 587 ; Grace v.

Hines v. John B. Sharkey Co.

449 A.2d 1092 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 1982

District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, D.C.App., 441 A.2d 889, 911 (1981) (en banc) (same); Citizens Association of Georgetown v. … See Pernell v.

Harper v. District of Columbia Committee on Admissions

375 A.2d 25 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1977

Richardson v. McFadden, 540 F.2d 744 (4th Cir. 1976) (South Carolina); Feldman v. State Board of Law Examiners, 438 F.2d 699 (8th Cir. 1971) (Arkansas); Chaney v. … See Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957); Whitfield v. Illinois Board of Law Examiners, 504 F.2d 474 (7th Cir. 1974); Pettit v.

Public Media Lab, Inc. & Manifold Productions, Inc. v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 2022

It asserts first that PML’s board of directors has not held any official meetings or maintained records of actions taken by the board since 2008, in violation of D.C. … Code § 29- 413.01, which sets record-keeping requirements; and PML’s by-laws, which provide for board management and annual board meetings.

Smith v. United States

312 A.2d 781 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 1973

In People v. … Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973); Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427 , 92 S.Ct. 1056 , 31 L.Ed.2d 340 (1972); Harrington v.