Case law

Parker v. Martin

905 A.2d 756 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 2006

Brown to remove the lead paint and repaint the Property. … (Charles) Williams v. Board of Trustees of Mount Jezreel Baptist Church, 589 A.2d 901, 906 (D.C.1991) (citing Washington Medical Center, Inc. v. Holle, 573 A.2d 1269, 1280-81 (D.C.1990)); Henderson v.

Borum v. United States

318 A.2d 590 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1974

Silverman v. United States, 365 U.S. 505, 510 , 81 S.Ct. 679, 682 , 5 L.Ed.2d 734 (1961). Compare Reid v. United States, D.C.App., 201 A.2d 867 (1964), with Whitley v. … As it noted in James v.

Dohoney v. Imperial Ins. Inc.

87 A.2d 412 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1952

Appellant relies on the cases of Raaen v. Southern Hotel Supply Co., D.C.Mun.App., 31 A.2d 659 , and Brown v. Clancy, D.C.Mun.App., 43 A.2d 296 . … Scott v. Wilson, D.C.Mun.App., 77 A.2d 321 ; Lewis v. Shifters, supra.

Ross v. United States

520 A.2d 1064 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1987

In Luce v. … The following holdings exemplify the broad range of misdemeanor convictions that we have held available for impeachment under §. 14-305: Brown v.

Patton v. United States

633 A.2d 800 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1993

Id.; Brown v. … Brown, 422 U.S. at 603-04 , 95 S.Ct. at 2261-62 (internal footnotes and citations omitted); see Taylor v. Alabama, 457 U.S. 687, 690 , 102 S.Ct. 2664, 2666 , 73 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982); Dunaway v.

Blackwell v. Dass

6 A.3d 1274 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 2010

See Brown v. National Academy of Sciences, 844 A.2d 1113, 1125 (D.C.2004); see also Clark v. United States, 593 A.2d 186, 193 (D.C.1991). … Greenwood, 464 U.S. 548, 553 , 104 S.Ct. 845 , 78 L.Ed.2d 663 (1984) (quoting Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 231-32 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973)).

McMillan v. United States

373 A.2d 912 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 25, 1977

In Beckwith v. … In Adams v.

Rones v. District of Columbia Department of Housing & Community Development

500 A.2d 998 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1985

In Board of Regents v. … Cleveland Board of Education v.

Cruz v. District of Columbia Department of Human Services

479 A.2d 333 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 1984

Cosgrove v. United States, 411 A.2d 57, 58-59 , (D.C.1980) (citing Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 , 97 S.Ct. 285, 292 , 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976), and Haines v. … (Respondent’s Brief at 5, citing Grove City College v. Bell, — U.S. -, - n. 13, 104 S.Ct. 1211 , 1217-18 n. 13, 79 L.Ed.2d 516 (1984)).

Gannon v. Manning

42 App. D.C. 206 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1914

Williams v. Brown, 34 Me. 594 ; Austen v. Gervas, Hobart, 77; Price v. Furman, 27 Vt. 268 , 65 Am. Dec. 194 . … Asso. v.

Fells v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

357 A.2d 395 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 19, 1976

On August 2, 1974, appellant, aged 72, boarded appellee’s bus. While the bus was in motion, she attempted to change her seat. … Applying the equally appropriate standard of Butler v.

District of Columbia v. Washington Market Co.

10 D.C. 559 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1881

(See Cook v. Brice, 20 Md.) … (See Wildeman v. Mayor, &c., of Baltimore City, 8 Md., 551 ; Lingan v. Carroll, 3 H. & McH., 333 , decided in 1793; Means v. Marche, 30 Md., 142 ; Barnes v. Barnes, 3 Cranch C. C., 269; Baptist Association v.

Cook v. James E. Griffith, Inc.

193 A.2d 427 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 1963

La Covey v. … Louis v. Bender, 248 Mo. 113 , 154 S.W. 88 , 44 L.R.A., N.S., 1072. 2 . Kirschner v. Klavik, D.C.Mun.App., 186 A.2d 227 ; Holiday Homes v. Briley, D.C. Mun.App., 122 A.2d 229 ; Rubin v.

Powell v. United States

649 A.2d 1082 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1994

Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1013 (D.C.1991) (citation omitted). Twenty-two years ago, Circuit Judge J. … See Brown, supra, 590 A.2d at 1020 . In this case, the trial court’s findings are clearly erroneous and not supported by the evidence. In Terry v.

Campbell v. United States

295 A.2d 498 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 26, 1972

Thereafter, he may voluntarily absent himself and the trial may continue as permitted by the second sentence of Rule 43. 8 This construction of Rule 43 is consistent with Brown v. … See United States v. Foster, D.C.App., 226 A.2d 164, 166 (1967) (jury case). See also Clawans v. Rives, 70 App.D.C. 107 , 104 F.2d 240 (1939) (nonjury case). . United States v.

In Re Bailey

976 A.2d 176 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 23, 2009

On November 22, 2000, respondent submitted a sworn Applicant’s Character and Fitness Questionnaire (“Virginia questionnaire”) to the Virginia Board of Bar Examiners. … Respondent also cites Small v.

Robinson v. United States

42 App. D.C. 186 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1914

Woodruff v. State, 61 Ark. 151 , 32 S. W. 102 ; Sharp v. State, 53 N. J. L. 511, 21 Atl. 1026 ; Brown v. People, 16 Hun, 535 ; People v. Baker, 96 N. Y. 340 ; Pittman v. State, 101 Miss. 553 , 58 So. 532 . … To the same effect are Buntain v. State, 15 Tex. App. 515; People v. Wieger, 100 Cal. 352 , 34 Pac. 826 ; People v. Oscar, 105 Mich. 704 , 63 N. W. 971 .

Coates v. Elzie

768 A.2d 997 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 2001

Brantley v. … McCulloch v.

Premier Poultry Co. v. Wm. Bornstein & Son, Inc.

61 A.2d 632 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 1948

This is the procedure which was followed a long time ago in Samaha v. Mason, 27 App.D.C. 470 ; also in John V. Farwell Co. v. … Fraser v. Crounse, D.C.Mun.App., 47 A.2d 96 . Jack Mann Chevrolet Co. v. Associates Inv. Co., 6 Cir., 125 F.2d 778 ; Lowell v. Brown, 1 Cir., 284 F. 936 ; Campbell v. Mowrer, 97 Kan. 496 , 155 P. 956 ; Joplin v.

In Re Pearl Robinson Bruce E. Gardner

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 2019

In re  4 Brown, 211 A.3d 165, 167 (D.C. 2019). … Nunnally v. Graham, 56 A.3d 130, 142 (D.C. 2012). We hold that the trial court was not required to find that Mr.