Case law

United States v. Smith

354 A.2d 510 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 1976

In Chaffin v. … Consolidated with United States v.

Hill v. Medlantic Health Care Group

933 A.2d 314 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 2007

See, e.g., Graff v. … Sowell v. Hyatt Corp., 623 A.2d 1221, 1224 (D.C.1993); Williams v. Baker 572 A.2d 1062, 1064 (D.C.1990) (en banc); Brown v.

Cook v. United States

932 A.2d 506 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 2007

See Walden v. United States, 366 A.2d 1075, 1076-77 (D.C.1976). … Brown v. United States, 795 A.2d 56, 63 (D.C.2002); see also (Timothy) Robinson v.

Byrd v. United States

598 A.2d 386 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 1991

Albernaz v. United States, 450 U.S. 333, 334 , 101 S.Ct. 1137, 1140 , 67 L.Ed.2d 275 (1981), quoting Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 , 97 S.Ct. 2221, 2225 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977). … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 168 , 97 S.Ct. 2221, 2226-27 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977) (“greater offense is ... by definition the ‘same’ for purposes of double jeopardy as any lesser offense included in it”).

Kaplan v. United States

277 A.2d 477 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 10, 1971

Demich, Inc. v. … See Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205, 210-211 , 84 S.Ct. 1723 , 12 L.Ed.2d 809 (1964). 4 .The affidavit stated in part that: This movie is of a white female with long brown hair, about 25 yrs. of age.

In Re JDR

637 A.2d 849 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1994

See Price v. United States, supra ; Munn v. … See, e.g., Marbury v.

Peter Minshall v. DC Dept. of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

184 A.3d 352 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 17, 2018

Basken v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 946 A.2d 356, 366 (D.C. 2008). … See Montgomery County v. Longo, 975 A.2d 312, 330 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2009).

Ray v. Bruce

31 A.2d 693 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1943

The same view was expressed by Judge Learned Hand in Board of Supervisors of Rockland County v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 2 Cir., 80 F.2d 248 . In Benson v. … Dittman, 245 U.S. 210, *695 214 , 38 S.Ct. 116 , 62 L.Ed. 248 ; Smith v. United States, 7 Cir., 52 F.2d 848 , and cases cited; Board of Supervisors v.

In Re Sugarman

677 A.2d 1049 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1996

PER CURIAM: The Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that respondent be disbarred pursuant to D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1995) in light of his plea of guilty and conviction in the United States District Court for the … See United States v. Lynch, 180 F.2d 696, 700 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 981 , 70 S.Ct. 1029 , 94 L.Ed. 1385 (1950).

Fisher v. District of Columbia

803 A.2d 962 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 2002

Seefeldt v. Board of Trustees of the Univ. of the District of Columbia, 487 F.Supp. 230, 233 (D.D.C.1979) (quoting Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 303 U.S. 41, 50-51 , 58 S.Ct. 459 , 82 L.Ed. 638 (1938)). … See Jackson v. District of Columbia Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board, 537 A.2d 576, 578 (D.C.1988).

Wisconsin-Newark Neighborhood Coalition v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission

33 A.3d 382 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 2011

Petitioners argue that the Commission erred in (1) failing to refer the project to the Board of Zoning Adjustment (“BZA” or “Board”); (2) failing to enforce the Macomb-Wiscon-sin Neighborhood Commercial Overlay District’s … of the Board shall not be required” under 11 DCMR § 2405.8.

McKenney & Woods v. WMATA

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 2024

Perkins v. … See Hughes v.

Chesser v. Troiano

61 A.2d 629 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 1948

See Schlosberg v. Shannon & Luchs Co., D.C.Mun.App., 53 A.2d 722 . Moore v. Burke, D.C.Mun.App., 45 A.2d 285 . Rheam v. Martin, 26 App.D.C. 181 ; Dillon & Co. v. Sharber, 19 Tenn.App. 488 , 90 S.W.2d 533 . Molt v. … Baumann, 65 App.Div. 445 , 72 N.Y.S. 832 ; Ham v. Brown Bros., 2 Ga.App. 71 , 58 S.E. 316 .

District of Columbia v. Singleton

81 A.2d 335 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1951

In Clark v. … Co. v. United States, 2 Cir., 206 F. 443, 445 .

Blumenthal v. Blumenthal

161 A.2d 137 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 24, 1960

In Bloedorn v. … Gessler v. Gessler, 6 Cir., 273 F.2d 302, 305 . See also Blades v. Szatai, 151 Md. 644 , 135 A. 841 , 50 A.L.R. 232 ; Gardine v. Cottey, 360 Mo. 681 , 230 S.W.2d 731 , 18 A.L.R.2d 1100 . .See footnote 1, supra.

Bohrer v. Fay

10 D.C. 145 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1881

Jur., sec. 898 ; High on Inj., sec. 85 ; Bateman v. Wilbor. 1 Sch. and Lef., 204, in addition to cases cited in brief by complainants’ counsel.) … Brown, and endorsed by Julius S. Bohrer and his wife. There is no averment in the bill denying the execution of the notes or alleging that they were not endorsed by said Julius and wife.

United States v. Bowles

304 A.2d 277 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1973

See North v. Superior Court, 8 Cal.3d 301 , 502 P.2d 1305 , 104 Cal.Rptr. 883 (1972) and People v. McKinnon, 7 Cal.3d 899 , 500 P.2d 1097 , 103 Cal.Rptr. 897 (1972); and compare Brown v. … King v. *279 State, 16 Md.App. 546 , 298 A.2d 446, 453 (1973). Whatever may be the holding in Coolidge , it did not overrule Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970).

Nicholas v. Howard

459 A.2d 1039 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1983

Appellants rely upon Young & Simon, Inc. v. Brown, 387 A.2d 724 (D.C.1978), and Dameron v. … Thornhill v. Atlantic Life Ins. Co., 70 F.2d 846 (D.C. Cir.1934); see Rinaldi v. Wallace, 293 A.2d 847, 849 (D.C.1972) (per curiam).

United States v. Burrell

286 A.2d 845 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1972

In United States v. … See Allen v. United States, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 61, 64 , 390 F.2d 476, 479 (1968); Bailey v. United States, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 354 , 364 n.9, 389 F.2d 305 , 315 n.9 (1967) (concurring opinion of Leventhal, J.); Brown v.

Fuller v. United States

873 A.2d 1108 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 12, 2005

Guzman v. United States, 769 A.2d 785, 790 (D.C.2001) (ellipsis in original) (quoting Brown v. United States, 683 A.2d 118, 124-25 (D.C.1996)). … Guzman, 769 A.2d at 790 (citing Brown, 683 A.2d at 124-25 ).