Case law

Holt v. United States

805 A.2d 949 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 2002

Holt also argues that the “same offense” analysis the Supreme Court applied in Brown v. … See Halicki v.

In Re Sugarman

677 A.2d 1049 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1996

PER CURIAM: The Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that respondent be disbarred pursuant to D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1995) in light of his plea of guilty and conviction in the United States District Court for the … See United States v. Lynch, 180 F.2d 696, 700 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 981 , 70 S.Ct. 1029 , 94 L.Ed. 1385 (1950).

Pellerin v. 1915 16th Street Cooperative Ass'n

980 A.2d 1234 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 2009

Co. v. … , that the Chairman could act on behalf of the Board ... upon stipulation, irrespective of quorum requirements.”); see also Will v.

David Young v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Institute for Public-Private Partnership

80 A.3d 635 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 2013

District of Columbia Appleseed Ctr. for Law & Justice, Inc. v. … See Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v.

Taylor v. Eureka Investment Corp.

482 A.2d 354 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 1984

Nader v. de Toledano, 408 A.2d 31 , 42 n. 6 (D.C.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1078 , 100 S.Ct. 1028 , 62 L.Ed.2d 761 (1980); see also Sledd v. … Nader v. de Toledano, supra, 408 A.2d at 42 (emphasis in original); accord, Holland v. Hannan, 456 A.2d 807, 815 (D.C.1983).

Bostick v. United States

605 A.2d 916 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 1992

Comber, supra, 584 A.2d at 41 n. 17 (citations omitted); Brown v. … Brown, supra, 584 A.2d at 542; see, e.g., United States v.

Deandre J. Posey v. United States

201 A.3d 1198 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 2019

Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1018 (D.C. 1991). … See, e.g., Brown, 590 A.2d at 1019 (“Citizens have no legal obligation to talk to police.”).

Miller v. Ambrose

35 App. D.C. 75 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1910

Brown v. Savings Bank, 28 App. D. C. 351; Consaul v. Cummings, 30 App. D. C. 540; Cooper v. Sillers, 30 App. D. C. 567. … Bank v. Olympia Cotton Mills, 128 Fed. 181 ; Cook v. Warren, 88 N. Y. 37 ; 31 Cyc. Law & Proc. p. 610.

Tuck v. United States

477 A.2d 1115 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 24, 1984

See Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1540 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983); Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 587 , 100 S.Ct. 1371, 1380 , 63 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980); G.M. Leasing Corp. v. … Texas v. Brown, supra, 103 S.Ct. at 1546 (Stevens, J. concurring).

Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Twin City Fire Insurance

803 A.2d 1001 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 2002

ALPA negotiates collective bargaining agreements and represents the pilots in grievance arbitration proceedings before the System Board of Adjustments (System Board). 1 In September 1998, David Zum-brun, a former Western … The System Board was established pursuant to the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 184 . 2 .

McKenney & Woods v. WMATA

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 2024

Perkins v. … See Hughes v.

Smith v. United States

414 A.2d 1189 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1980

In Johnson v. United States, D.C.App., 398 A.2d 354 (1979), this court discussed at length the doctrine of judicial discretion and appellate review thereof. … Id. at 365 , citing among other authorities, Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 496 , 73 S.Ct. 397, 441 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953).

Matthews v. United States

629 A.2d 1185 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 26, 1993

Givens and appellant reemerged about half an hour later with three plastic garbage bags and a brown leather bag; appellant was carrying two of the plastic bags. … He was unsure whether appellant ever saw the body, which was covered with a board. 10 .

Douglas-Bey v. United States

490 A.2d 1137 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1985

See Brown v. United States, 464 A.2d 120 (D.C.1983). Appellant also contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss for lack of speedy trial. We disagree. MacDonald v. … Louisiana, supra , Mincey v. Arizona, supra , United States v. Dart, 747 F.2d 263, 265 (4th Cir.1984), and United States v.

Cox v. United States

256 A.2d 917 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1969

Brown v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 43 , 45-46, 365 F.2d 976, 978-979 (1966). See also Bailey, supra; Ellis v. … Appellant seeks to bring his case within Gatlin v.

Rose v. Rose

2 D.C. 108 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1935

Weld v. Weld, 27 Minn. 330, 331 . In the case of Boger v. Boger, 86 W. … Williams v. Williams, (Ariz.) 265 P. 87 .

In re L.M.

5 A.3d 18 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2010

See Brown v. United States, 627 A.2d 499, 508 (D.C.1993) (defendant may not take one position at trial and contradictory one on appeal). … Dorsey v. United States, 902 A.2d 107, 111 (D.C.2006).

United Methodist Church v. White

571 A.2d 790 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1990

White was sent notice of the Board of Ministry’s action by letter dated May 14, 1987. The contents of the letter were read to him on June 3, 1987. … The General Board of Higher Education is a Tennessee corporation that is not under the auspices or control of the Baltimore Annual Conference. 3 . Rev.

Perrino v. D. C. Transit System, Inc.

218 A.2d 519 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1966

Plaintiff brought this action charging that she was injured as a result of a bus driver’s negligence in stopping beyond a bus stop and so near a sewer that in attempting to board the bus she slipped and fell. … Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Thomas, 180 Va. 292 , 23 S.E.2d 148 (1942); see Greco v. Public Service Interstate Transp. Co., 135 N.J.L. 280 , 51 A.2d 1 (Ct.App.1947). See also MacDonald v.

Bolet v. United States

417 A.2d 386 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1980

Brown, 2 Cox C.C. 348 (1847) (false representation to A that B’s goods were delivered, thereby causing B to make payment). … In the language of The Queen v. Brown, supra at 352, Goldsoll’s alleged fraud was never shown to have “operated on the mind” of the French government. It is clear the defendant cannot find refuge in Foster .