Case law

Washington Times v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

530 A.2d 1186 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1987

Agency counsel has attempted to justify the challenged agency action as proper in the light of our holdings in Jadallah v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services, 476 A.2d 671 (D.C. 1984) and Curtis v. … Hawkins v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 381 A.2d 619, 622 (D.C.1977). 3 .

McDaniel v. McDaniel

254 A.2d 407 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1969

See Boyce v. Boyce, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 355 , 153 F.2d 229 (1946); Roberts v. Roberts, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 382 , 222 F.2d 408 (1955). … from bed and board for one year without cohabitation

Tillman v. Director of Vehicles & Traffic

144 A.2d 922 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1958

[Citing National Labor Relations Board v. Indiana & Michigan Elec. Co., 318 U.S. 9, 28 , 63 S.Ct. 394 , 87 L.Ed. 579 .] The requirements of a fair hearing are dependent upon the nature and purpose of the hearing itself. … See Daniels v. Director of Vehicles & Traffic of Dist. of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 143 A.2d 95 ; Ritch v. Director of Vehicles & Traffic of Dist. of Columbia, supra. 3 . See Chappelle v.

Robbins v. Roumel

138 A.2d 922 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 1958

Brown v. Christman, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 203 , 126 F.2d 625 ; Boss v. Hardee, 70 App.D.C. 50 , 103 F.2d 751 . 2 . Restatement, Agency (1933) § 423, comment a; Restatement, Trusts (1935) § 8, comment f. 3 . … City of Gretna v. Gosserand, La.App., 191 So. 750 ; Ehrich v. Andrews, 207 App.Div. 378 , 202 N.Y.S. 65 ; Restatement, Agency (1933) § 382, comment d. 5 . Cave v. Lougee & Zimmer, 134 Ga. 135 , 67 S.E. 667 . 6 .

Stephens v. Williams

2 D.C. 33 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1935

See Layne v. Tribune Co., 63 App. D. C. 213; Neely v. Inquirer Co., 61 App. D. C. 334; Cancelmo v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co., 56 App. D. C. 225; Peoples Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co., 246 U. … It does not appear that the position of member of a school board was one of profit, but the cases relied on by the court to sustain jurisdiction involved positions of profit. In the case of Haupt v. Schmidt, 70 Ind.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Barksdale-Showell

965 A.2d 16 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2009

Barks-dale-Showell boarded the escalator headed down to the train platform. She initially stood on the right side and rode the escalator down. Then, Ms. … Brown v. Nat’l Acad. Sci., 844 A.2d 1113, 1115 (D.C.2004) (citation omitted).

New Travel, Inc. v. District of Columbia Office of Human Rights

530 A.2d 217 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1987

D.C.Code § l-1510(a) (1981); see also Donnelly Associates v. District of Columbia Historic Preservation Review Board, 620 A.2d 270, 276 (D.C.1987).

Michael Tann v. United States

206 A.3d 273 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2019

The “Board of Judges” of the D.C. … See Johnson v. United States, 647 A.2d 1124, 1125 (D.C. 1994) (statement of Farrell, J.)

In re Stanback

913 A.2d 1270 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 2006

Next, the Board reviewed the testimony of Dr. Ronald D. … See Order of the Court dated March 1, 1990 (en banc), appearing at p. v of the Rules. .The undisputed facts on which the Court relied are set forth in the disciplinary hearing committee's report.

Johnson v. District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals

912 A.2d 1181 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2006

See also Providence Hosp. v. … Board of Trustees of the Univ. of the District of Columbia, 714 A.2d 776, 781 (D.C.1998) (quoting Cohen v. Rental Housing Comm’n, 496 A.2d 603, 605 (D.C.1985)).

Henderson v. District of Columbia

493 A.2d 982 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 31, 1985

However, subsequent to oral argument, the Supreme Court decided Cleveland Board of Education v. … See Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, supra.

KORDAS v. Sugarbaker

990 A.2d 496 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 2010

In Aikman v. … Ray v. American Nat. Red Cross, 696 A.2d 399, 404 (D.C.1997) (quoting Meek v. Shepard, 484 A.2d 579, 581 (D.C.1984)); see Morrison v.

Kakaes v. George Washington University

790 A.2d 581 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2002

District of Columbia v. Wical Ltd. P’ship, 630 A.2d 174, 184 (D.C.1993) (quoting Marshall v. District of Columbia, 458 A.2d 28, 29 (D.C.1982)); accord, District of Columbia v. N. … Co. v. Smith, 644 A.2d 1328, 1344 [n. 21] (D.C.1994); Hemminger v. Scott, 111 A.2d 619 [, 620] (D.C.1955).

Dickson v. District of Columbia

938 A.2d 688 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 2007

Duggan v. … Compare, e.g., Duggan v.

Northeast Neighbors for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. AppleTree Institute for Education Innovation, Inc.

92 A.3d 1114 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2014

Heard v. … Board decisions are reviewed in Superior Court).

In Re O'Donnell

517 A.2d 1069 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 1986

Donnelly v. O’Donnell, CA 2777-83 (Superior Ct. filed Mar. 9, 1983). … Board on Professional Responsibility By: /s/ George W. Miller George W. Miller Date: June 5, 1986 All members of the Board concur in this Report and Recommendation. .

American Combustion, Inc. v. Minority Business Opportunity Commission

29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,183 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 1982

George Washington University v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 429 A.2d 1342, 1345 (1981). Accord, Monaco v. … See Wieck v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 383 A.2d 7, 11 (1978); Nathanson v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 289 A.2d 881, 884 (1972).

In re J. T.

290 A.2d 821 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 12, 1972

Pee v. United States, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 47, 49 , 274 F.2d 550, 558 (1959); Brown v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 203 , 338 F.2d 543 (1904). . Hee appendix to opinion of Judge Pretty-man in Pee v. … White v. Reid, 125 F.Supp. 047 , 049 (D.D.O. 1954). See also Brown v. United States, supra. . See. note 7, supra. . In Kent v.

Rodriguez v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

452 A.2d 1170 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 1982

The Acting Director concluded that application of the subjective test set forth in Jacobs v. … Dyer v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 392 A.2d 1, 3 (1978). He is also presumed to be aware of the statutory definition of “earnings” as all remuneration payable for personal services.

Smith v. United States

389 A.2d 1356 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1978

In the incident for which Ronald Malcolm was convicted, two women were abducted by four men in a brown Ford Galaxie 500 and were taken to an apartment where a fifth man waited; there, in an incident which lasted over four … He alleges that she once stated that the passenger, unlike himself, had reddish-brown hair, yet the complainant’s testimony directly contradicts this assertion.