Case law

In Re Kline

955 A.2d 155 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 2008

Respondent has not filed any exceptions to the Board’s report and recommendation. … See Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Robert L. Kline, III, AG No. 22, 401 Md. 493 , 932 A.2d 1185 (2007).

Ober v. Riggs Nat. Bank of Washington

31 A.2d 877 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1943

Cucullu v. Hernandez, 103 U.S. 105 [ 26 L.Ed. 322 ] ; Rey v. … Thereafter he sold the real estate to Brown who took title subject to the trust without assuming its payment. Brown sold to Cameron who by the conveyance assumed and agreed to pay the note.

Holmes v. United States

580 A.2d 1259 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 1990

In Brown v. United States, 464 A.2d 120, 123 (D.C.1983), this court repeated the quoted language from Naples and Harrison , and added (quoting United States v. … In Rindgo v.

Watkins v. Carty's Automotive Electrical Center, Inc.

632 A.2d 109 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1993

Wilds v. … Co. v.

Fields v. United States

466 A.2d 822 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 11, 1983

See, e.g., Brown v. Craven, 424 F.2d 1166, 1169-70 (9th Cir.1970) (when trial court, inter alia, summarily rejected accused’s pretrial claims of ineffective assistance, new trial required); United States v. … Frady, supra note 9, 456 U.S. at 166, 102 S.Ct. at 1593 ; United States v. Addonizio, 442 U.S. 178 , 184 & n. 10, 99 S.Ct. 2235 , 2240 & n. 10, 60 L.Ed.2d 805 (1979); Brown v.

City Mortgage Investment Club v. Beh

334 A.2d 183 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1975

See, e. g., Schwartz v. Brown, D.C.Mun.App., 64 A.2d 298, 299 (1949). … See Arrington v. Becker, D.C.Mun.App., 182 A.2d 836 (1962); see also Linbrook Realty Corp. v. Rogers, 158 Va. 181 , 163 S.E. 346 (1932); Rosenthal v. Heft, 155 Md. 410 , 142 A. 598 (1928).

Chevy Chase Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Council

307 A.2d 740 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1973

Carr v. District of Columbia, supra n. 14. … E. g., Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727 , 92 S.Ct. 1361 , 31 L.Ed.2d 636 (1972); N.A.A.C.P. v. Button, 371 U.S. 415, 428 , 83 S.Ct. 328 , 9 L.Ed.2d 405 (1963); cf. Bd. of Elections v.

Decius v. Marriott Corp.

402 A.2d 841 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1979

E. g., Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Miller, supra. … Zentz v.

In Re Wingerter

959 A.2d 64 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2008

Grievance Comm’n v. … Wingerter, 400 Md. 214 , 929 A.2d 47 (2007), this court’s October 1, 2007, order suspending respondent from the practice of law pending further action of the court, the May 27, 2008, Report and Recommendation of the Board

Worthy v. District of Columbia

601 A.2d 581 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1991

Brown *582 This notice, containing no mention whatsoever of where the accident took place, does not satisfy the requirement of “a reasonable guide for inspection” embodied in § 12-309, as interpreted by our decisions. … E.g., Gaskins v. District of Columbia, 579 A.2d 719, 721-22 (D.C.1990) (quoting Dixon v. District of Columbia, 168 A.2d 905, 907 (D.C.1961); see also Washington v.

Long v. United States

36 A.3d 363 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 2012

Brown v. United States, 934 A.2d 930, 943 (D.C.2007) (citing Strickland, supra, 466 U.S. at 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Swinton, supra, 333 F.3d at 490 (citing United States v. Brown, 305 F.3d 304, 309 (5th Cir.2002)); see also United States v. Moss, 252 F.3d 993, 997 (8th Cir.2001).

Bungardeanu v. England

219 A.2d 104 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 1966

LaForest v. Board of Commissioners, 67 App.D.C. 396 , 92 F.2d 547 , cert. denied 302 U.S. 760 , 58 S.Ct. 367 , 82 L.Ed. 588 (1937). … V, 1966); cf. LaForest v. Board of Commissioners, supra.

Jahr v. District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals

19 A.3d 334 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 26, 2011

Accord Ferris v. … See Stokes v.

In Re Creek

243 A.2d 49 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1968

Linkletter v. … Circuit Court of Brown County, Br. 1, 37 Wis.2d 329 , 155 N.W.2d 141 (1967). Contra, State v. Hance, 2 Md.App. 162 , 233 A.2d 326 (1967); Cradle v. Peyton, 208 Va. 243 , 156 S.E.2d 874 (1967). 3 .

Henderson v. Henderson

206 A.2d 267 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 1965

Maur v. Ciabarro, D.C.Mun.App., 154 A. 2d 366 (1959). … Boyce v. Boyce, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 355 , 153 F.2d 229 (1946).

Abney v. United States

616 A.2d 856 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1992

See Abney v. United States, 451 A.2d 78 (D.C.1982) (Abney II); United States v. Abney, 175 U.S.App.D.C. 247 , 534 F.2d 984 (1976) (Abney I). … On January 18, 1991, the Capitol Police Board issued Order 91.1 closing all steps and the areas adjacent to the U.S.

Barnes v. Scheve

633 A.2d 62 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 1993

See Mathis, supra note 6; Brown, supra note 6. … v.

Sherman v. Commission on Licensure to Practice the Healing Art

407 A.2d 595 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1979

Kemp v. Board of Medical Supervisors, 46 App.D.C. 173, 180 (1917). The public’s need for that protection is amply illustrated by the facts of this case. … Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 293 A.2d 470 (1972). The conflicting requirements of judicial deference and judicial review make this especially important.

Tolu v. Ayodeji

945 A.2d 596 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 2008

Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 717 A.2d 309, 316 (D.C.1998) (quoting Dudley v. Meadowbrook, Inc., 166 A.2d 743, 744 (D.C.1961)). … Brown, supra, 717 A.2d at 316 n. 9 (quoting Husovsky v. United States, 191 U.S.App.

Isley v. Bolling Aero Club, Inc.

148 A.2d 717 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1959

Each member shall share monthly dues, in an amount to be determined by the Board, sufficient to cover insurance and finances. … If any, ■ the Board shall set rates to be charged for flying time sufficient to cover cost of operation and a sum to be set aside for repairs.