Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdc

7,092 results

3.25s

  • Kurtz v. Capital Wall Paper Co.

    61 A.2d 470 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 1948

    the act of Congress creating said Board. … V, § 36 — 401 et seq.

    Questioned by Jack Jeffries v. Potomac Development Corporation v. Erwin F. Simon & Associates and Thomas L. Watson, Third-Party, 822 F.2d 87 (1987)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Wages v. United States

    952 A.2d 952 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 17, 2008

    Investigators also impounded a brown Buick Riviera that appellant was known to drive. … See, e.g., Adams v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Belcher v. Jenkins Engineering Co.

    123 A.2d 215 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1956

    In Moskios v. … Fowler v. Stanford, D.C.Mun.App., 89 A.2d 885 . 2 . Millaway v. Brown, Mo.App., 197 S.W.2d 987 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Rosen v. American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Inc.

    41 A.3d 1250 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 2012

    In Gibson v. … The trial court ruled that Rosen did "not allege[] sufficient facts to satisfy a showing of willful misconduct by Board Member Defendants nor any act or omission by the Board Member Defendants that [was] not in good faith

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Owens v. United States

    497 A.2d 1086 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1985

    See Brown v. Ohio, supra, 432 U.S. at 169 , 97 S.Ct. at 2227 (nine-day joyride constituted a single offense); accord, e.g., Parker v. United States, 476 A.2d 173, 176 (D.C.1984) (four-day joyride). … Compare Brown v. Ohio, supra, 432 U.S. at 169 , 97 S.Ct. at 2227 (nine-day joyride held to be a single offense), and Glymph v.

    Cited 71 timesPublished
  • Artis v. United States

    505 A.2d 52 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1986

    After completing the last of the three episodes of thievery, D.N. showed the recorder to his nephew, Lawrence “Putney” Brown and recounted to Brown how he had obtained it. … (Phillip) Dyson v. United States, 418 A.2d 127, 132 (D.C.1980); accord, Jaggers v. United States, 482 A.2d 786, 796 (D.C.1984) (quoting {Duane) Dyson v. United States, 450 A.2d 432, 437 (D.C.1982)); Sherrod v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Stevens ex rel. Stevens v. Willis

    175 A.2d 600 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 1961

    Shewmaker v. Capital Transit Co., 79 U.S.App.D.C. 102, 103 , 143 F.2d 142, 143 (1944). . Brown v. Capital Transit Co., 75 U.S.App.D.C. 337 , 127 F.2d 329 (1942).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Propp v. Counterpart International

    39 A.3d 856 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 2012

    Brown, Washington, DC, and Kara M. Ariail for appellees. Before THOMPSON, Associate Judge, RUIZ, Associate Judge, Retired, [*] and FARRELL, Senior Judge. … Co. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Sims v. EAST WASHINGTON RAILWAY COMPANY

    222 A.2d 641 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 1966

    Shewmaker v. Capital Transit Co., 79 U.S.App.D.C. 102 , 143 F.2d 142 (1944); Great A & P Tea Co. v. Aveilhe, D.C.Mun.App., 116 A.2d 162 (1955). … Glaria v. Washington Southern R. Co., 30 App.D.C. 559, 566 (1908); Brown v. Clancy, D.C.Mun.App., 43 A.2d 296 (1945).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re Pearson

    628 A.2d 94 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1993

    In its report, the Board stated that although given an opportunity to respond to Bar Counsel, respondent never did so. … Our principal authority for so holding was Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 (1949), which set aside a judgment by default in a naturalization proceeding.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In re A.H.

    459 A.2d 1045 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1983

    See Brown v. Fogel, 387 F.2d 692, 696 (4th Cir.1967).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hunter v. United States

    606 A.2d 139 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1992

    Brown was also going to be charged (as indeed she was). Hunter remonstrated that Ms. Brown didn’t have anything to do with it.” He also asserted that he had paid a “gentleman” forty dollars for use of the car. … As this court pointed out in Walker v.

    Cited 102 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. United States

    639 A.2d 86 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1994

    Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651, 662 , 97 S.Ct. 2034, 2041 , 52 L.Ed.2d 651 (1977); Green v. … On Thursdays and Fridays, the decedent regularly brought large amounts of cash to the store in a brown handbag for the store’s check-cashing service.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In re Noyes

    35 App. D.C. 107 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1910

    It may be added that the Brown patent, mentioned above, as having an air strainer, shows a dust collector interposed- between the explosive engine and the end of the air pipe. … Co. v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co. 110 U. S. 490, 494 , 28 L. ed. 222, 223, 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 220; Howe Mach. Co. v. National Needle Co. 134 U. S. 388, 397 , 33 L. ed. 903, 968, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 570; Durham v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sherman v. District of Columbia Commission on Licensure to Practice Healing Art

    476 A.2d 667 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1984

    Jonal Corp. v. District of Columbia, 175 U.S.App.D.C. 57, 65-66 , 533 F.2d 1192, 1200-01 (1976); see Mendota Apartments v. D.C. … Commission on Human Rights, 315 A.2d 832 (D.C.1974); Citizens Association of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia ABC Board, 359 A.2d 295 (D.C.1976).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re Kline

    955 A.2d 155 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 2008

    Respondent has not filed any exceptions to the Board’s report and recommendation. … See Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Robert L. Kline, III, AG No. 22, 401 Md. 493 , 932 A.2d 1185 (2007).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sodexho Marriott Corp. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

    858 A.2d 452 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 2004

    Citing a prior administrative decision, Brown v. Blake Const. Co., Dir. Dkt. No. 95-74, 1998 D.C. Wrk. Comp. … See Kalbak v. Washington Hosp. Ctr., Dir. Dkt. No. 99-50, 2001 D.C. Wrk. Comp. LEXIS 321, * 3-4 (Nov. 30, 2001); see also Brown, 1998 D.C. Wrk. Comp. LEXIS at * 3.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Watkins v. Carty's Automotive Electrical Center, Inc.

    632 A.2d 109 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1993

    Wilds v. … Co. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Goodman v. District of Columbia

    50 A.2d 812 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 1947

    United States v. American Trucking Ass’ns, 310 U.S. 534 , 60 S.Ct. 1059 , 84 L.Ed. 1345 ; Small v. United States, 71 App.D.C. 332 , 110 F.2d 122 , 127 A.L.R. 814 ; Janof v. … Newsom, 60 App.D.C. 291 , 53 F.2d 149 ; Price v. Quill, D.C.Mun.App., 46 A.2d 311 . Scharfield v. Richardson, 76 U.S.Ap.D.C. 378, 133 F.2d 340 , 145 A.L.R. 980 ; Railroad Retirement Board v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Chevy Chase Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Council

    307 A.2d 740 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1973

    Carr v. District of Columbia, supra n. 14. … E. g., Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727 , 92 S.Ct. 1361 , 31 L.Ed.2d 636 (1972); N.A.A.C.P. v. Button, 371 U.S. 415, 428 , 83 S.Ct. 328 , 9 L.Ed.2d 405 (1963); cf. Bd. of Elections v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.