Case law

Dozier v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 2019

Bumper v.  10 North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 548 (1968); see (Valerie M.) Brown v. United States, 983 A.2d 1023, 1027 (D.C. 2009). … This would be equivalent to the repeated question in Brown.

Dozier v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 2019

Bumper v.  10 North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 548 (1968); see (Valerie M.) Brown v. United States, 983 A.2d 1023, 1027 (D.C. 2009). … This would be equivalent to the repeated question in Brown.

Mexicano v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

806 A.2d 198 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 5, 2002

See Upchurch v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 783 A.2d 623, 626 (D.C.2001) (citing Charles P. Young Co. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 681 A.2d 451, 456-57 (D.C.1996)). … Brown v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 700 A.2d 787, 791 (D.C.1997).

Nixon v. Hansford

584 A.2d 597 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 1991

Karr v. C. Dudley Brown & Assoc., Inc., 567 A.2d 1306, 1308 (D.C.1989); Billes v. Bail *599 ey, 555 A.2d 460, 462 (D.C.1989); Thompson v. Wolfrey, 483 A.2d 636, 637 (D.C.1984); Erwin v. … Craft, 452 A.2d 971, 972 (D.C.1982); Truitt v. Miller, 407 A.2d 1073, 1078 (D.C.1979); Bathroom Design Institute v. Parker, 317 A.2d 526, 528 (D.C.1974); Miller v.

In re Zackey

838 A.2d 313 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 2003

Zackey did not participate in the proceedings before the Board, nor has he excepted to the Board’s recommendation. … V. Conclusion The Board recommends that identical reciprocal discipline be imposed and that Respondent be disbarred.

Atlas Van Lines v. Austin

44 A.2d 696 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1945

We have no discretionary power to entertain special appeals from interlocutory orders (Brown v. … Cooper v. Burton, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 298 , 127 E.2d 741; Kaufman v. United States, D.C.D.C., 35 F.Supp. 900 ; Orange Theatre Corp. v.

Scanlan v. Snow

2 App. D.C. 137 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 2, 1894

Hawes v. Oakland, 104 U. S., 450 ; Dimpfell v. Ohio & Miss. R. R. Co., 110 U. S., 209 ; Taylor v. Holmes, 127 U. S. 489 ; Morawetz on Priv. Corp., Secs. 175, 219, and cases cited in notes. … Mining Co. v. Anglo-Californian Bank, 104 U. S., 192 ; Ralls County v. Douglass, 105 U. S., 728 . But the testimony does not show any such invalidity as is claimed.

V. E. M. Hotel Service, Inc. v. Uline, Inc.

190 A.2d 812 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 17, 1963

Cope Ford, Inc. v. Lastfogel, D.C.Mun.App., 184 A.2d 206 . … Woods v. Cannaday, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 281, 282 , 158 F.2d 184, 185 ; Emmco Insurance Company v. Brown, D.C.Mun.App., 178 A.2d 429 ; Comer v. Fistere, D.C.Mun.App., 103 A.2d 206 .

JEAN-BAPTISTE BADO v. UNITED STATES

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 2015

Brown v. United States, 675 A.2d 953 (D.C. 1996), on which the dissent relies, is easily distinguishable. … For example, in Brown v.

McManus v. MCI Communications Corp.

748 A.2d 949 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 2000

V. … Carr v. Brown, 395 A.2d 79 (D.C.1978).

Leonard v. District of Columbia

794 A.2d 618 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2002

See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-70 , 92 *624 S.Ct. 2701, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Id. at 576-77 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 (citing Slochower v. Board of Educ., 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956) and Wieman v. Updegraff, 344 U.S. 183 , 73 S.Ct. 215 , 97 L.Ed. 216 (1952)).

Central Amusement Company v. District of Columbia

121 A.2d 865 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1956

See District of Columbia v. John R. … Neild v. District of Columbia, 71 App.D.C. 306 , 110 E.2d 246. 7 . Hamilton National Bank of Washington v. District of Columbia, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 109 , 178 F.2d 624 . 8 . Bolling v.

Kurtz v. Capital Wall Paper Co.

61 A.2d 470 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 1948

the act of Congress creating said Board. … V, § 36 — 401 et seq.

In re Ekekwe-Kauffman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 27, 2022

Fox, III, Disciplinary Counsel, and Myles V. Lynk, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, were on the brief, for the Office of Disciplinary Counsel. … The Board on Professional Responsibility unanimously agreed with that recommendation, though one Board member was recused and did not participate.

Propp v. Counterpart International

39 A.3d 856 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 2012

Brown, Washington, DC, and Kara M. Ariail for appellees. Before THOMPSON, Associate Judge, RUIZ, Associate Judge, Retired, [*] and FARRELL, Senior Judge. … Co. v.

Thoma v. Kettler Bros., Inc.

632 A.2d 725 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1993

He sued and attempted to introduce as evidence a safety regulation promulgated by the Minimum Wage and Industrial Safety Board which arguably had been violated by the company in maintaining the machine. … District of Columbia v. Brown, 589 A.2d 384, 387 (D.C.1991) (D.C. elevator code not meant to protect members of general public from their own negligence). 8 *729 III.

Wyner v. District of Columbia

411 A.2d 59 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1980

On November 3, 1978, the taxpayer received notice of the Board’s affirmance of the assessed value. … See Super.Ct.Civ.R. 56(e); Reynolds v.

Staves v. Johnson

44 A.2d 870 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1945

Shaffer v. Bowes, D.C.Mun.App., 31 A.2d 690 ; Colwell v. Stonebraker, D.C.Mun.App., 31 A.2d 866 ; Klein v. Fields, D.C.Mun.App., 32 A.2d 398 ; Gould v. Butler, D.C.Mun. App., 31 A.2d 867 ; Downs v. Karsh, D.C. … For decisions on this question under a similar provision of the federal Emergency Price Control Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq., see Brown v. Wood, D.C.N.D.Cal., 59 F.Supp. 872 ; Snyder v.

ROYSTON CLEMENT and MARIE EASON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES & CENTER RADIOLOGY

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 2015

See United States v. Great N. Ry. Co., 287 U.S. 144, 154-55 (1932); District of Columbia v. Acme Reporting Co., 530 A.2d 708, 713 (D.C. 1987). … Savs. & Loan Ass’n v. Solimino, 501 U.S. 104, 112 (1991).

Bennett v. United States

375 A.2d 499 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 1977

United States v. Brown, 160 U.S. App.D.C. 190, 198, 490 F.2d 758, 766 (1974). These statements fall within two general categories. … See United States v. Brown, supra; People v. Lew, supra; People v.