Case law

Dottellis v. Dottellis

187 A.2d 128 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1962

In Butler v. … McClure v. McClure, 205 Ark. 1032 , 172 S.W.2d 243 . 3 . See e. g., Hurd v. Hurd, 86 U.S.App. D.C. 62, 179 F.2d 68 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 147 , 191 F.2d 344 . 4 . See McClure v.

Brisker v. District of Columbia

510 A.2d 1037 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1986

Taxpayers timely appealed the assessments to the Board of Equalization and Review. The Board sustained the assessments. Taxpayers prepaid their taxes and brought their appeals in the Superior Court Tax Division. … See District of Columbia v.

Capital Construction Co. v. Plaza West Cooperative Ass'n

604 A.2d 428 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1992

Karr v. C. Dudley Brown & Assocs., Inc., 567 A.2d 1306, 1309 (D.C.1989); Bathroom Design Inst. v. Parker, 317 A.2d at 529 . III. … Karr v. C. Dudley Brown & Assocs., Inc., 567 A.2d at 1309 . On balance, however, we are not persuaded that the contract between Capital and Plaza West falls outside the reach of the regulations.

Gibson v. Johnson

492 A.2d 574 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1985

Mindell v. Glenn, 65 A.2d 340, 341-42 (D.C.1949). In any event, where, as here, there is no necessary and direct issue of title between the parties, appellant need not have complied with Rule 5(c). Brown v. … In Regina Brown v.

Quick v. Paregol

61 A.2d 407 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 1948

Brown by separate instruments leased the properties to the tenant by the month. The leases are on printed forms and are substantially identical. … Merritt v. Kay, 54 App.D.C. 152 , 295 F. 973 ; Stewart v. Shannon & Luchs Co., D.C.Mun.App., 46 A.2d 863 ; Walsh v. Cooper, D.C.Mun.App., 31 A.2d 883 .

Langley v. Kornegay

620 A.2d 865 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 1993

See, e.g., Brown v. … Bowen v.

Blumenthal v. Blumenthal

155 A.2d 525 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 1959

. * * * ” Citing our case of Hitchcock v. Thomason, D.C.Mun.App., 148 A.2d 458, 461 . … “The Domestic Relations Branch and each judge sitting therein shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all actions for divorce from the bond of marriage and legal separation from bed and board, including proceedings incidental

Christmas v. United States

314 A.2d 473 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1974

The vehicle was occupied by two persons, later identified as appellant (the driver) and James Brown (a passenger). … Whereupon the officer opened the vial, removed the two pills and placed appellant and Brown under arrest for possession of suspected dangerous drugs.

United States v. Page

298 A.2d 233 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1972

United States v. Humphrey, supra; People v. Superior Court of Yolo County, 3 Cal.3d 807 , 91 Cal.Rptr. 729 , 478 P.2d 449 (1970); People v. Pitts, 40 Mich.App. 567 , 199 N.W. 2d 271 (1972); Brown v. … United States, 371 U.S. 471 , 83 S.Ct. 407 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963); Brown v. State, supra.

Dozier v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 2019

Bumper v.  10 North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 548 (1968); see (Valerie M.) Brown v. United States, 983 A.2d 1023, 1027 (D.C. 2009). … This would be equivalent to the repeated question in Brown.

Kalorama Heights Ltd. Partnership v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

655 A.2d 865 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1995

The Board’s staff recommended denial. 4 On July 18, 1990, the Review Board held a meeting to address KHLP’s application at which the Board heard oral presentations and received written submissions. … See Abolaji v. D.C.

Smith's Transfer and Storage Co. v. Murphy

115 A.2d 300 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1955

Wigmore on Evidence (3rd ed.), § 2491; Richmond Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Tidewater Const. Corp., 4 Cir., 170 F.2d 392, 394 . … Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York T. Barge Corp., 314 U.S. 104 , 62 S.Ct. 156, 161 , 86 L.Ed. 89 .

Roundtree v. United States

581 A.2d 315 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1990

See also Goldman v. United States, 473 A.2d 852, 856 (D.C.1984); Brown v. United States, 409 A.2d 1093, 1099-1100 (D.C.1979). … Brown, supra, 409 A.2d at 1100 .

Wells v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

513 A.2d 235 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 1986

Goto v. … Meaney v. Board of Review, 151 N.J.Super. 295, 299 , 376 A.2d 1253, 1255 (App.Div.1977) (quoting N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(d)) (emphasis in original).

In re Manning

593 A.2d 643 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 1991

The Maryland Discipline The case in which Respondent was indefinitely suspended in Maryland (Attorney Grievance Commission v. … The case which led to Respondent’s disbarment in Maryland (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Manning, 318 Md. 697 , 569 A.2d 1250 February 27, 1990) also involved four separate matters.

Jones v. United States

398 A.2d 11 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 1979

See United States v. Brown, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 190, 212 , 490 F.2d 758, 780 (1973) (as amended Jan. 10, 1974). Nevertheless I concur in affirmance. See Kotteakos v. … Campbell v. United States, D.C.App., 391 A.2d 283 (1978) (prejudicial error).

Kelvin Johnson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

111 A.3d 9 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 2015

Guarantee Fund v. … For the foregoing reasons, the order of the Compensation Review Board is Affirmed.

Paylor v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

225 A.2d 312 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1967

Jackson v. Capital Transit Co., 69 App.D.C. 147, 148 , 99 F.2d 380, 381 (1938), cert. denied, 306 U.S. 630 , 59 S.Ct. 464 , 83 L.Ed. 1032 (1939); Smith v. … Brown v. Alabama Foods, Inc., D.C.App., 190 A.2d 257 (1963).

In re Shein

848 A.2d 614 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 6, 2004

Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Shein, 369 Md. 657 , 802 A.2d 437 (2002). … Respondent, who has not participated in the proceeding before the Board or in this Court, 1 does not contest the Board’s recommendation, nor does Bar Counsel, and no reason appears not to adopt it.

Lyons v. United States

221 A.2d 711 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1966

The following language from the United States v. Di Re, 332 U.S. 581, 593 , 68 S.Ct. 222, 228 , 92 L.Ed. 210 (1948), is appropriate here. … Bynum v. United States, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 368 , 262 F.2d 465 (1958).