Case law

St. Mary's Episcopal Church v. DC Zoning Comm'n & Hillel at the George Washington Univ.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 2017

Brown for petitioners. John Patrick Brown, Jr., with whom Kate M. Olson was on the brief for intervenor. Karl A. Racine, Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Todd S. … Gilmartin v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 579 A.2d 1164, 1168 (D.C. 1990) (quoting Palmer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 287 A.2d 535, 539 (D.C. 1972)).

In Re Molovinsky

723 A.2d 406 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1999

In District of Columbia v. Molovinsky, Civil Action No. 0003808-97 (Sup.Ct. … In Molovinsky v. The Fair Employment Council of Greater Washington, Respondent lost a $79,000 judgment and failed properly to preserve three issues for appellate review. 683 A.2d at 142-43 . In Molovinsky v.

Burson v. Vogel

29 App. D.C. 388 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1907

Lowrie v. Taylor, 27 App. D. … Coffee v. Guerrant, 3 App. D. C. 497, 499; Norden v. Spaulding, 24 App. D. C. 286, 290; Gallagher v. Hien, 25 App. D. C. 77. 82; Lowrie v. Taylor, 27 App. D. C. 522, 526.

Lloyd's Window Products Co. v. District of Columbia Minority Business Opportunity Commission

585 A.2d 1323 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 1990

See George Washington University v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 429 A.2d 1342, 1345 (D.C.1981). … Liberty v. District of Columbia Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, 452 A.2d 1187, 1189 (D.C.1982). We conclude that the MBOC’s findings are supported by substantial evidence.

Cambridge Management Co. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

515 A.2d 721 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1986

See Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, 443 A.2d 507, 513 (D.C.1981) (en banc). … See Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, supra, 443 A.2d at 513 (“a validly promulgated regulation ... is binding upon the Board ... [and] has the force and effect of law” (citations omitted)).

Dottellis v. Dottellis

187 A.2d 128 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1962

In Butler v. … McClure v. McClure, 205 Ark. 1032 , 172 S.W.2d 243 . 3 . See e. g., Hurd v. Hurd, 86 U.S.App. D.C. 62, 179 F.2d 68 ; Hawkins v. Hawkins, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 147 , 191 F.2d 344 . 4 . See McClure v.

Sheffield v. United States

397 A.2d 963 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1979

King then gave the names of two of his abductors, Lawrence Brown and Claude Wade, to the police officers. He also picked their photographs from an array. … See, e. g., Brown v. United States, D.C. *968 App., 372 A.2d 557, 561 (1977).

Schwier v. Schwier

207 A.2d 115 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 1965

Dixon v. Dixon, D.C.App., 190 A.2d 652, 654 (1963). … Coles v. Coles, D.C.App., 204 A.2d 330, 332 (1964).

Antoine Mayhand v. United States

127 A.3d 1198 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 2015

Brown v. United States, 27 A.3d 127 (D.C. 2011) (quoting Dutch v. … But see United States v. Woodfolk, 656 A.2d 1145, 1150 (D.C. 1995) (assuming that such bootstrapping would not be permitted and that some corroborating evidence would be required); Brown v.

McCray v. United States

133 A.3d 205 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 2016

Brown heard “a whole lot of shooting ... back and forth.” Mr. Brown testified before the grand jury that following the shooting, Mr. Fortson said to him, “[my] bad.” At trial, Mr. BroWn said Mr. … Brown v. United States, 818 A.2d 179, 184-85 (D.C.2003) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

In re John F. Kennedy and Kathleen A. Dolan

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 2022

See, e.g., Knisley v. City of Jacksonville, 497 N.E.2d 883, 887-88 (Ill. App. Ct. 1986), appeal denied, 505 N.E.2d 353 (Ill. App. … Respondents point out that attorney’s fees awards in FLSA cases can be large relative to the often small amount of each individual claim, see Fegley v.

Greenwood v. United States

225 A.2d 878 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1967

The parties further stipulated that one Brown would have testified that appellant stated he was “going to try and borrow that car.” … Appellant’s argument was inferentially rejected in Evans v.

Cross v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

740 A.2d 977 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 1999

Abebe v. Benitez, 667 A.2d 834, 836 (D.C.1995) (citing District of Columbia v. Evans, 644 A.2d 1008, 1019 (D.C.1994) (other citations omitted)). … (citing Cole v. Capital Transit Co., 90 U.S.App.D.C. 289 , 195 F.2d 568 (1952) and Lindsey v. D.C. Transit Co., 140 A.2d 306, 309 (D.C.1958)); see also Loketch v.

Fussell v. United States

505 A.2d 72 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 1986

State v. Durham, 196 N.W.2d 428 (Iowa 1972); People v. Seligman, 35 A.D.2d 591 , 313 N.Y.S.2d 593 , aff'd, 28 N.Y.2d 788 , 321 N.Y.S.2d 901 , 270 N.E.2d 721 (Ct.App. 1971); People v. … The rider merely “flashes" the pass, purchased earlier, to Metro officials who then allow the rider to board the bus.

In re Van

726 A.2d 199 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1999

We adopt the recommendation of the Board. The conduct that led to the imposition of discipline in other jurisdictions is described in State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar v. … Neither Bar Counsel nor Van has filed an exception to the Board’s recommendation. Our review of the Board’s proposed sanction is therefore extremely deferential.

Bishop v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 29, 2024

Brown’s convictions on direct appeal. See Brown v. United States, 934 A.2d 930 (D.C. 2007).  4 B. … Roper v.

Thalis v. England

193 A.2d 855 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 24, 1963

Accordingly, the administrative defects, if any, which occurred at the hearings before the Traffic Medical Advisory Board did not affect the substantial evidence supporting the order. Affirmed. . Ritch v. … Burch v. Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia, D.C.App., 191 A.2d 604 (1963).

Braxton v. McNamara

429 A.2d 183 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1981

Frazier v. Center Motors, Inc., D.C.App., 418 A.2d 1018, 1020 (1980); Grier v. Rowland, D.C.App., 409 A.2d 205 , 206 n.1 (1979); Pollock v. Brown, D.C.App., 395 A.2d 50, 52 (1978); Garces v. … Bradley, D.C.App., 299 A.2d 142, 144 (1973); Koppal v. Travelers Indemnity Co., D.C.App., 297 A.2d 337 , 339 (1972).

Pannu v. Jacobson

909 A.2d 178 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 2006

“[I]n view of the uniform standards of proficiency established by national board certification,” the standard of care for board-certified physicians “is to be measured by the national standard.” Morrison v. … Transit Auth. v.

Star Pontiac Company v. Eastern Insurance Company

184 A.2d 200 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 1962

The same witness testified that keys for cars kept in the enclosure were hung on a board inside the main building, and that anyone passing by could take these keys off. … On the morning that the theft was discovered, the key to the stolen vehicle was missing from the board. New keys were made, and the original keys were never found.