Case law

In the Matter of Fredenberger

760 A.2d 207 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 2000

Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, and the report and recommendation of the Board … It is FURTHER ORDERED that Bar Counsel’s petition for discipline based upon respondent’s criminal conviction in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia United States v. William E.

Medhin v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 2024

Roberts v. … Tinsley v. United States, 868 A.2d 867, 883 (D.C. 2005) (Glickman, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (quoting Brown v. United States, 726 A.2d 149, 154 (D.C. 1999)).

United States v. Jackson

528 A.2d 1211 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1987

State v. Brown, supra, 318 A.2d at 258 ; see State v. … Commonwealth v. Lewis, supra, 409 N.E.2d at 773 ; State v. Young, supra note 11, 390 A.2d at 562 (Schreiber, Jr., concurring) (citation omitted); State v. Brown, supra, 318 A.2d at 260 .

United States v. Bamiduro

718 A.2d 547 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1998

Ejeh identified him as wearing a jacket and “face cap” that were “kind of dark brown.” … Hill v.

Pinkney v. United States

851 A.2d 479 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 2004

See Brown, 590 A.2d at 1020 . … Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 123 , 120 S.Ct. 673 , 145 L.Ed.2d 570 (2000); accord, e.g., James v. United States, 829 A.2d 963, 966 (D.C.2003) (citing Brown, 590 A.2d at 1014 ).

Johnson v. Allied Eastern States Maintenance Corp.

488 A.2d 1341 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1985

In Reed v. … See, e.g., Baker v.

In re Blackwell

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 10, 2023

Fox, III, Disciplinary Counsel, Myles V. Lynk, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, and Julia L. Porter, Deputy Disciplinary Counsel, were on the brief for the Office of Disciplinary Counsel. … Brookens v.

Thorne v. United States

452 A.2d 170 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 1982

United States v. Brown, D.C.App., 309 A.2d 256, 258 (1973); see also Pender v. United States, D.C.App., 310 A.2d 252, 254 (1973); Bond v. United States, D.C.App., 310 A.2d 221, 226 (1973); Mozelle v. … United States v. Brown, supra.

Lively v. Flexible Packaging Ass'n

765 A.2d 954 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 2001

At the time of her resignation, she wrote a memorandum to each member of FPA’s Board of Directors (“Board”), describing Mr. Braswell’s ongoing harassment. As a result of Ms. … Lively of reporting his conduct to the Board, said that if she did she was a liar, and instructed the directors that they were not to complain to the Board. In 1988, Mrs. Lively had received from Mr.

Millard v. Roach

631 A.2d 1217 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1993

Brown, 753 F.2d 455, 456 (5th Cir.1985), sover-eignties may waive or surrender their priority jurisdiction. See Bullock v. State of Mississippi, 404 F.2d 75, 76 (5th Cir.1968). 13 . … See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 753 F.2d 455, 456 (5th Cir.1985). 17 .

Ward v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

89 A.3d 115 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 2014

See Owen v. Board of Dirs. of Wash. City Orphan Asylum, 888 A.2d 255, 270 (D.C.2005). … Brown v. M St. Five, LLC, 56 A.3d 765, 780 (D.C.2012) (internal quotation marks *127 omitted).

Capitol Hill Restoration Society, Inc. v. Moore

410 A.2d 184 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 1980

C. v. … Board provided for such review. 9 See id., at 304-05 .

1827 M Street, Inc. v. District of Columbia

537 A.2d 1078 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1988

E.g., Department of Public Works & Buildings v. Rogers, 39 Ill.2d 109, 113-14 , 233 N.E.2d 409, 412 (1968); State Roads Commission v. Orleans, 239 Md. 368, 379 , 211 A.2d 715, 722-723 (1965); State Roads Commission v. … State Highway Commissioner v. Speare, 86 N.J.Super. 565, 579-81 , 207 A.2d 552, 560 , cert. denied, 45 N.J. 589 , 214 A.2d 28 (1965); Bembinster v.

United States v. Minick

438 A.2d 205 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 1982

In Brooks v. … The factors listed in Dorman v.

In re Pullings

753 A.2d 1013 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 2000

Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, and the report and recommendation of the Board … It is FURTHER ORDERED that Bar Counsel’s petition for discipline based upon respondent’s plea of guilty in a criminal matter -in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (United States v. Retna M.

Hallums v. United States

841 A.2d 1270 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 2004

Id.; accord, Brown v. … See Gutierrez v. McGinnis, 2003 WL 21782628 , at*7, 2003 U.S. Dist LEXIS 13333 at *13 (S.D.N.Y.2003); Brown, 229 F.Supp.2d at 309-10 ; Reedus v.

City & Suburban Railway Co. v. Svedborg

20 App. D.C. 543 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1902

Dougherty v. Mo. RR. Co., 81 Mo. 325 ; Murphy v. St. L. & S. Ry. Co., 43 Mo. App. 342 ; Murphy v. C. I. & B. RR. Co., 36 Hun, 199 ; Consol. Traction Co. v. Thalheimer, 59 N. J. L. 474. … Justice Lamar, it is said: “ Since the decisions in Stokes v. Saltonstall, 13 Pet. 181 , and New Jersey R. & Transp. Co. v.

Harris v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

476 A.2d 1111 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1984

Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 294 A.2d 177, 179 (D.C.1972) (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938)). … Lawlor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 37 Pa.Commw. 380, 385, 391 A.2d 8, 11 (1978) (language used by employer lacked the immediacy and finality of a “firing”); Yasgur v.

In Re Banks

561 A.2d 158 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 1989

Colorado Bar Ass’n v. Taylor, 56 Colo. 441 , 138 P. 762 , 763 (Colo.1914)); see also Merrick v. American Security & Trust Co., 71 App. D.C. 72, 74 , 107 F.2d 271, 273 (1939). … Colorado Bar Association v. Erbaugh, 42 Colo. 480, 487-88 , 94 P. 349 , 352 (1908).

In Re Borders

797 A.2d 716 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 2, 2002

Petitioner now, rather than seek reinstatement via a petition filed with the Board on Professional Responsibility, see D.C. Bar R. … Petitioner must file the appropriate application for reinstatement with the Board, and in that proceeding he “may urge the pardon as a consideration for reinstatement.” Grossgold v.