Case law

IN RE ABIGAIL ASKEW

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 2014

Gregory v. United States, 393 A.2d 132, 141 (D.C. 1978) (footnote omitted). … United States v. Bailey, 581 F.2d 984, 989 (D.C.

Parker v. K & L Gates, LLP

76 A.3d 859 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 2013

Nickens v. Labor Agency, 600 A.2d 813 , 817 n. 2 (D.C.1991). 6 Accordingly, Mr. Parker is bound by those terms. See Brown v. … V.

Hazel v. Barry

580 A.2d 110 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 1990

Hooker v. Edes Home, 579 A.2d 608, 617-618 (D.C.1990). 4 . … over the Board.

Riverside Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Health

944 A.2d 1098 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 2008

See United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co., 351 U.S. 192, 197 , 76 S.Ct. 763 , 100 L.Ed. 1081 (1956); Lee v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review, 423 A.2d 210, 215 (D.C.1980). … Myers v.

Adams v. United States

558 A.2d 348 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 17, 1989

Chappell’s weapon consisted of brass knuckles; Dent used a metal pole; Adams brandished a wooden board. While the pole and board were introduced into evidence, the brass knuckles were never recovered. 2 . … Fersner v.

In re Mazingo-Mayronne

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 2022

Myles V. Lynk, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, with whom Hamilton P. Fox, III, Disciplinary Counsel, was on the brief, for petitioner. … We agree with the Board’s conclusion on that point. Third, Ms.

Pitts v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

497 A.2d 1060 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 1985

Schock v. Board of Review, Department of Labor and Industry, 89 N.J.Super. 118, 123-125 , 214 A.2d 40, 43 (N.J.1965), aff'd, 48 N.J. 121 , 223 A.2d 633 (1966). … Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 377 A.2d 436, 439 (D.C.1977); Wallace v.

Wolf v. Regardie

553 A.2d 1213 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 27, 1989

See Brown v. American Broadcasting Co., 704 F.2d 1296, 1302 (4th Cir.1983) (citing Bernstein v. National Broadcasting Co., 129 F.Supp. 817, 825 (D.D.C.1955), aff'd, 98 U.S.App. … See Harris v. Easton Publishing Co., 335 Pa.Super. 141, 154 , 483 A.2d 1377, 1384 (1984); Brown v. Mullarkey, 632 S.W.2d 507, 509 (Mo.Ct. App.1982); W. Prosser, supra, § 117, at 809-12.

Mohler v. Houston

356 A.2d 646 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1976

[Brown v. Shimabukuro, 73 App.D.C. 194, 195 , 118 F.2d 17, 18 (1941).] See also Geier v. Jordan, D.C.Mun.App., 107 A.2d 440 (1954); United States v. … Young v. Young, supra, 57 App.D.C. at 158 , 18 F.2d at 808 .

In re Dunietz

832 A.2d 161 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 2003

Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Dunietz, 368 Md. 419 , 795 A.2d 706 (2002). After learning of that disbarment, Bar Counsel tiled a certified copy of the Maryland order with this court. … The Board has now recommended that respondent be disbarred as reciprocal discipline. 1 Bar Counsel has advised us that she takes no exception to the Board’s recommendation.

Reynolds v. Gateway Georgetown Condominium Ass'n

482 A.2d 1248 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1984

Boks v. Charles E. … Article V, §§ 3(a) and (d), allow the Board of Directors to impose the move-in/move-out fee despite the fact that the membership opposed its addition as an amendment to the Bylaws.

In re O'Neill

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 2022

People v. … O’Neill has been disbarred in Maryland for separate conduct, Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Md. v.

In re Teitelbaum

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 2023

The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) argues that the fact that the account had insufficient funds established misappropriation of the funds, and therefore we must reject the negotiated disposition and order … submit to ODC the results of his successful completion of corrective measures at least 90 days before his probation expires, including descriptions of steps implemented and training materials used; and (v)

Olson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

736 A.2d 1032 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1999

Brown, supra note 21, 700 A.2d at 792 (citing Dupont Circle Citizens Ass’n v. District of Columbia Zoning Comm’n, 426 A.2d 327, 334 (D.C.1981)). … Olson cites Brown v.

Penn Central Transportation Co. v. Reddick

398 A.2d 27 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1979

There was no evidence that Jones was in fact traveling from Union Terminal to Potomac Yard for the purpose of commencing an “extra board” trip. … See Garriepy v.

Washington Public Interest Organization v. District of Columbia

436 A.2d 1299 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 1981

See Alyeska Pipeline Co. v. … Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471 , 475 n.6, 90 S.Ct. 1153, 1156-1157, n.6 , 25 L.Ed.2d 491 (1969).

Quarles v. United States

308 A.2d 773 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1973

Appellant pushed between them in boarding the bus and once on the bus, as Mr. … Nye & Nissen v. United States, 335 U.S. 613 , 69 S.Ct. 766 , 93 L.Ed. 919 (1949); United States v. Lumpkin, 145 U.S.App.D.C. 162 , 448 F.2d 1085 (1971); Bailey v. United States, supra; Davis v.

In re Post

738 A.2d 281 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1999

Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Post, 350 Md. 85 , 710 A.2d 935 (1998). … Bar Rule XI, § 11(d), and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”). Respondent did not fully comply with the requirements of D .C.

Geddie v. United States

284 A.2d 668 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1971

There was also testimony that Brown gave the physical appearance of one who had recently injected heroin. … Rossi v. United States, 289 U.S. 89, 91-92 , 53 S.Ct. 532, 533 , 77 L.Ed. 1051 (1933), quoted with approval, United States v.

Askin v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

521 A.2d 669 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1987

We encountered a somewhat analogous situation in Poyner v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, 456 A.2d 1249 (D.C.1983). … Feldman v. D.C.