Case law

Fluellyn v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

54 A.3d 1156 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 2012

Co. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 638 A.2d 690, 694 (D.C.1994)). In Carey v. Crane Sen. … Biratu v.

Central Fidelity Bank v. McLellan

563 A.2d 358 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 1989

United States v. … Bogliano & Co., Inc. v. Brown, 333 A.2d 674 (D.C.1975); Manchester Gardens v. Great West Life Assur. Co., 92 U.S.App.D.C. 320 , 325-26, 205 F.2d 872, 877-78 (1953); cf. Stansel v.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

827 A.2d 35 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 2003

Specifically, in a case of this type, where the presumption of compensability has been challenged by the employer, our approach has been summarized partially in Brown v. … Brown, supra, 700 A.2d at 791 .

In re Johnson, III

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 26, 2022

Porter, Deputy Disciplinary Counsel, and Myles V. Lynk, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, were on the brief, for the Office of the Disciplinary Counsel. … a)(10) (the brief must contain an argument “containing the appellant’s contentions and the reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of the record on which the appellant relies”); see also Comford v.

American Machine Tool Distributors Ass'n v. National Permanent Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

464 A.2d 907 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 1983

National Bank of Georgia v. … Johnson’s testimony was offered to rebut the testimony of National Permanent’s witnesses, Heitmuller and Brown.

In re Sobo

905 A.2d 158 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 2006

No exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation have been filed. … Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Sobo, 386 Md. 1 , 870 A.2d 1217 (2005). On May 17, 2005, Bar Counsel filed a certified copy of the order from the Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Young v. United States

391 A.2d 248 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 1978

McCormick, Evidence, supra, § 286 at 685; see also, e. g., People v. Warren, 259 Ill. 213 , 102 N.E. 201 (1913); State v. Pearce, 56 Minn. 226 , 57 N.W. 652 (1894); Wilson v. … State, 86 Nev. 320 , 468 P.2d 346 (1970); State v. Wright, 36 N.M. 74 , 8 P.2d 443 (1932); Commonwealth v. Brown, 388 Pa. 613 , 131 A.2d 367 (1957), explained in Commonwealth v.

Sykes v. United States

897 A.2d 769 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 2006

Chambers v. Mississippi 410 U.S. 284, 294 , 93 S.Ct. 1038 , 35 L.Ed.2d 297 (1973); see also Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14, 19 , 87 S.Ct. 1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967). … Castellon v. United States, 864 A.2d 141 , 159-60 (D.C.2004) (citing Bassil v.

Karriem v. Gray

623 A.2d 112 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1993

That issue has been finally decided by the District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review. 4 See Rhema Christian Ctr. v. … See Mannan v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine, 558 A.2d 329, 333-34 (D.C.1989). Appellant received adequate notice, and he has failed to demonstrate that he was not properly served.

Combs v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

983 A.2d 1004 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 2009

But see Golding-Alleyne v. … Bank v. American Motorists Ins. Co., 538 A.2d 736, 739-41 (D.C.1988); see also Anderson v.

Ford v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 2025

Brown v. … See Brown v.

Velasquez v. United States

801 A.2d 72 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 2002

Guzman v. United States, 769 A.2d 785, 790 (D.C.2001) (citing (Rocky) Brown v. United States, 683 A.2d 118, 124 (D.C.1996)). … The court may also limit cross-examination “ “where the prejudicial effect of the proffered evidence outweighs its probative value.’ ” Guzman, 769 A.2d at 790 (quoting (Rocky) Brown, 683 A.2d at 124 ) (quoting Elliott v.

Simpson v. United States

632 A.2d 374 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1993

See Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385 , 98 S.Ct. 2408 , 57 L.Ed.2d 290 (1978). … Our decision in Brown v.

In re Speights

173 A.3d 96 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 2017

A sanction at least as severe as that imposed in Askew is therefore appropriate, V. … See Hughes v. Seven Springs Farm, Inc., 563 Pa. 501 , 762 A.2d 339 (2000). . In support of this argument, respondent relied on the decision of this court’s predecessor in Niosi v.

Dunn v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

467 A.2d 966 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 27, 1983

Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 294 A.2d 177, 179 (D.C.1972) (quoting Consolidated Edison Company v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 216 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938)). … Id. at 334; Wood v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 334 A.2d 188 (D.C.1975).

Bennett v. United States

876 A.2d 623 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 2005

Id. at 79 (citing Guzman v. United States, 769 A.2d 785, 790 (D.C.2001)) (in turn citing (Rocky) Brown v. United States, 683 A.2d 118, 124 (D.C.1996)). … v.

McIntosh v. Greenway Apartments, Inc.

164 A.2d 351 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1960

Lord v. … Co., 5 Cir., 71 F.2d 115 ; Livingston v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 4 Cir., 28 F.2d 563 ; McBreen v. Collins, 284 Mass. 253 , 187 N.E. 591 . But see Williamson v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 237 Miss. 141 , 112 So.2d 529 .

Mayes v. United States

653 A.2d 856 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1995

In Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008 (D.C.1991), we stated that [wjhether reasonable suspicion or probable cause exists to justify a seizure is a mixed question of fact and law. … Brown, supra, 590 A.2d at 1014 (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 230 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2328 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)).

Stack v. United States

519 A.2d 147 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1986

v. … To require a greater proffer for the admissibility of such exculpatory evidence would distort Beale and Brown.

In Re Caplan

691 A.2d 1152 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1997

We agree with that conclusion and accept the Board’s recommendation. * Criminal offenses involving theft and fraud inherently involve moral turpitude. … The crime of grand theft under California law, requiring as it does a felonious intent to steal or take property in addition to the actual stealing or taking, e.g., People v.