Case law

Hood v. United States

661 A.2d 1081 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1995

Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C.1991). … See Brown, supra, 590 A.2d at 1014 .

Shimer v. Edwards

482 A.2d 399 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 1984

In weighing whether the grant of such a sanction would constitute a proper exercise of discretion, see generally Johnson v. … Grier v. Rowland, 409 A.2d 205 (D.C.1979); Pollock v. Brown, 395 A.2d 50, 52 (D.C.1978); Koppal v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 297 A.2d 337 (D.C.1972).

Phillips v. Mooney

126 A.2d 305 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 1956

Drummond, 55 Okl. 351 , 155 P. 555 ; Brown v. Crawford, 296 Ky. 249 , 177 S.W.2d 1 ; Brown v. Simpson, 293 Ky. 755 , 170 S.W.2d 345 ; Stiles v. Lile, 203 Ky. 225 , 262 S.W. 18 . Cf. Galvan v. … Penney Co. v. Gravelle, supra; Breckenridge v. Drummond, supra; Stiles v. Bile, supra; Annotation, 154 A.L.R. 121 . 6 . United States v. Michener, 3 Cir., 152 F.2d 880 ; Southern Transp. Co. v.

Wilson v. Brame

228 A.2d 326 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1967

Holmes v. Stahl, D.C.App., 190 A.2d 102 (1963); Reading v. Faucon, D.C.Mun.App., 134 A. 2d 376 (1957); Mayers v. Greenwald, D.C.Mun.App., 129 A.2d 854 (1957) ; Dohoney v. Imperial Ins. … . *328 2d 412 (1952); Shu v. Basinger, D.C.Mun. App., 57 A.2d 295 (1948); Brown v. Clancy, D.C.Mun.App., 43 A.2d 296 (1945); see Akers v. Tomlinson, D.C.App., 222 A.2d 644 (1966); Carter v.

In re Edmonds

96 A.3d 683 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 2014

Bank of Am., N.A. v. Griffin, 2 A.3d 1070, 1072 (D.C. 2010) (citing District of Columbia v. Mor-rissey, 668 A.2d 792, 796 (D.C.1995)). … ("the Board”) but prior to the Board’s final eligibility determination.

In Re Klein

747 A.2d 1179 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2000

STEADMAN, Associate Judge: Before us is a recommendation by the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) requesting that Respondent Shmu-el B. … We adopt the recommendation of the Board. I.

Degge v. Hitchcock

35 App. D.C. 218 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 10, 1910

Harris v. Barber, supra; Re Schneider, 148 U. S. 162—166, 37 L. ed. 406-408, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 572; Hendley v. Clark, and Bradshaw v. Earnshaw, supra; Hamilton v. Harwood, 113 Ill. 154 ; Gaither v. … Allman v. District of Columbia, 3 App. D. C. 8; Jones v. District of Columbia, 3 App. D. C. 26; Keyser v. District of Columbia, *227 3 App. D. C. 31; Schaefer v. District of Columbia, 3 App. D.

Harrison v. District of Columbia Department of Human Services

472 A.2d 405 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1984

Furthermore, in Dietrich v. … We took this course in Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra, though there were also additional procedural transgressions in that case.

Atlantic Coast Line R. v. Goldberg

39 A.2d 563 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1944

Code 1940, 17 — 101; New York Continental Jewell Filtration Co. v. Karr, 31 App.D.C. 459 ; Berkeley v. Culley, 42 App.D.C. 140 . Code 1940, § 11 — 772(a); Brown v. Randle & Garvin, D.C.Mun.App., 32 A.2d 104 . … Groesbeck v. Duluth, S. S. & A. R. Co., 250 U.S. 607 , 40 S.Ct. 38, 41 , 63 L.Ed. 1167 . See Brown v. Canadian Pac. R. Co., D.C.W.D.N.Y., 25 F.Supp. 566 .

Sims v. District of Columbia

531 A.2d 648 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 1987

See American Federation of Gov’t Employees v. Barry, 459 A.2d 1045, 1048 (D.C.1983). In enacting the CMPA, the D.C. … The Board of Trustees itself is appointed by a panel consisting of three judges plus the Mayor. § 1-2703(b).

District of Columbia v. Greene

806 A.2d 216 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 5, 2002

See Coffin v. … Schlosser Co. v.

Jean-Baptiste Bado v. US (en banc)

186 A.3d 1243 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2018

See Brown v. United States , 675 A.2d 953 , 954 (D.C. 1996). … Reliance on Brown is inapt.

Fales v. Commission on Licensure to Practice the Healing Art

275 A.2d 238 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1971

Boynton v. Perkins, 138 Kan. 899 , 28 P.2d 765 (1934); People v. Griswold, 213 N.Y. 92 , 106 N.E. 929 (1914); and see Aitchison v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 98 A.2d 791, 793 (1953). … People v. Griswold, supra. Therefore, the license creates no vested right which other states are bound to recognize. State v. Crombie, 107 Minn. 171 , 119 N.W. 660 (1909); see Aitchison v. United States, supra.

American Machine Tool Distributors Ass'n v. National Permanent Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

464 A.2d 907 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 1983

National Bank of Georgia v. … Johnson’s testimony was offered to rebut the testimony of National Permanent’s witnesses, Heitmuller and Brown.

Butler v. United States

890 A.2d 181 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 2006

Johnson, 746 A.2d at 355 (citations omitted and emphasis added); accord, Brown v. United States, 864 A.2d 996, 1004 (D.C.2005); Davis v. … Brown, 864 A.2d at 1004 (citing Jones v. United States, 566 A.2d 44, 46 (D.C.1989)).

In re Speights

173 A.3d 96 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 2017

A sanction at least as severe as that imposed in Askew is therefore appropriate, V. … See Hughes v. Seven Springs Farm, Inc., 563 Pa. 501 , 762 A.2d 339 (2000). . In support of this argument, respondent relied on the decision of this court’s predecessor in Niosi v.

Central Fidelity Bank v. McLellan

563 A.2d 358 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 1989

United States v. … Bogliano & Co., Inc. v. Brown, 333 A.2d 674 (D.C.1975); Manchester Gardens v. Great West Life Assur. Co., 92 U.S.App.D.C. 320 , 325-26, 205 F.2d 872, 877-78 (1953); cf. Stansel v.

Young v. United States

391 A.2d 248 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 1978

McCormick, Evidence, supra, § 286 at 685; see also, e. g., People v. Warren, 259 Ill. 213 , 102 N.E. 201 (1913); State v. Pearce, 56 Minn. 226 , 57 N.W. 652 (1894); Wilson v. … State, 86 Nev. 320 , 468 P.2d 346 (1970); State v. Wright, 36 N.M. 74 , 8 P.2d 443 (1932); Commonwealth v. Brown, 388 Pa. 613 , 131 A.2d 367 (1957), explained in Commonwealth v.

Jessica A. Lihlakha v. United States

89 A.3d 479 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 2014

The trial judge discredited Investigator Brown’s testimony that the barring notice extended to Howard’s entire campus, but Lihlakha herself did not dispute Brown’s testimony that he had given her a copy of the barring notice … See Jones v.

Wilson v. United States

358 A.2d 324 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 20, 1976

Appellant was found guilty of stealing a brown leather coat on January 16, 1974. … In Boone v. United States, 296 A. 2d 449, 450 (1972), we approved the strict rule adopted in United States v.