Case law

National Voter Contact, Inc. v. Versace

511 A.2d 393 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1986

Board of Education, 34 Misc.2d 8, 9 , 228 N.Y.S.2d 62, 65 (1962) (letter calling court’s attention to its failure to consider certain relief is considered as an application for reargument). In Carr v. … Brown, 395 A.2d 79 (D.C.1978), this court considered a letter from counsel as "nothing more than” a request for an explanation of the court's order of dismissal. Id. at 81 .

FW Berens Sales Co., Inc. v. McKinney

310 A.2d 601 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1973

Co., 186 F.2d 473, 481 (4th Cir. 1951); Where a school board failed to admit the plaintiffs as pupils solely because they were unwed mothers after a court had already held in another case in which the very same school board … See Shull v. Columbia Municipal Separate School District, supra, 338 F.Supp. at 1378 (“[T]he [school] board acted directly contrary to Judge Keady’s holding in Smith.

In re Klayman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 2022

V. Other Disciplinary Proceedings Mr. … See PHCDC1, LLC v.

Capitol Hill Rest. Soc. v. DC ZON. ADJ. BD.

534 A.2d 939 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1987

National Black Child Development Institute, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 483 A.2d 687, 690 (D.C.1984); Roumel v. … District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 384 A.2d 674, 677 (D.C.1978); Taylor v.

Sams v. United States

721 A.2d 945 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1998

Wiggins, Brown, and Lee each testified that Reid stabbed Ward repeatedly as he lay on the ground. … See, e.g., Brown v. United States, 619 A.2d 1180, 1182 (D.C.1992) (“Appellant cannot raise a legitimate self-defense claim when he went out of his way to look for trouble”); Mitchell v.

Bender v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

562 A.2d 1205 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 1989

District Unemployment Compensation Board, 350 A.2d 730, 733 (D.C.1976); see McKart v. *1208 United States, 395 U.S. 185, 193 , 89 S.Ct. 1657, 1662 , 23 L.Ed.2d 194 (1969); Myers v. … No. 1581, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. 5, 8 (1968); see also Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 294 A.2d 177, 178-79 (D.C.1972).

In Re Bridges

805 A.2d 233 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 2002

See Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Bridges, 360 Md. 489 , 759 A.2d 233 (2000). … See also Sperry v.

McGee v. United States

533 A.2d 1268 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1987

Stewart v. … E.g., McClain v. United States, 460 A.2d 562, 567 (D.C.1983); Byrd v. United States, 388 A.2d 1225, 1229 (D.C.1978).

Second Episcopal District African Methodist Episcopal Church v. Prioleau

49 A.3d 812 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 2012

Cornerstone AME’s Steward and Finance Board (“Board”) met in April 2008. … Pardue v. Center City Consortium Sch. of the Archdiocese of Washington, Inc., 875 A.2d 669, 675 (D.C. 2005); Meshel v. Ohev Sholom Talmud Torah, 869 A.2d 343, 353 (D.C.2005); Heard v.

Mason v. Director of Motor Vehicles

186 A.2d 893 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 1962

provides: “No owner of * * * a motor vehicle in the District of Columbia shall allow or permit the same to be operated by any individual who is not a duly licensed operator.” 2 .Code 1961, §§ 40-302, 40-602(a); La Forest v. … Board of Commissioners, 67 App.D.C. 396 , 92 F.2d 547 (1937). 3 . Part V, Traffic & Motor Vehicle Regulations of the District of Columbia. 4 . La Forest v. Board of Commissioners, supra n. 2 .

District of Columbia v. Douglass

452 A.2d 329 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1982

Citizens Association of Georgetown, Inc. v. Washington, D.C.App., 291 A.2d 699, 703 (1972); see DeBruhl v. District of Columbia Hackers’ License Appeal Board, D.C.App., 384 A.2d 421, 425 (1978). … Board of *332 Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 238-39 , 77 S.Ct. 752, 755-756 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957); Woods v. District of Columbia Nurses’ Examining Board, D.C.App., 436 A.2d 369, 382 (1981).

Mayfield v. United States

276 A.2d 123 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1971

Appellant denied placing any object under the seat or any knowledge of the brown envelope. 3 . See also United States v. Johnson, U.S. App.D.C., 442 F.2d 1239 (No. 23,900, decided March 22, 1971). 4 . … Chambers v. Maroney, supra, at 47 , 90 S.Ct. at 1979 .

Breen v. DC POLICE FIREFIGHTERS RET. BD.

731 A.2d 843 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 1999

BREEN, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA POLICE AND FIREFIGHTERS RETIREMENT AND RELIEF BOARD, Respondent. No. 97-AA-272. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued May 18, 1999. … The Board found petitioner was sixty-one percent disabled and thus entitled to an annuity of $15,834.38. Petitioner appealed this determination. In Breen v.

Dillon v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

912 A.2d 556 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 2006

Ctr. v. … See Clark v.

Bowman v. United States

212 A.2d 610 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 1965

This has no relevancy here, as no claim is made that either appellant or Ferguson intended to board a train and then purchase a ticket. … Martin v. City of Strutters, 319 U.S. 141, 147 , 83 S.Ct. 862 , 865, 87 L.Ed. 1313 (1943).

United States v. Morton

50 A.3d 476 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 2012

Brown informed police that he gave “Shorty” $40 in exchange for nearly $200 worth of groceries. Brown told police that he did not know “Shorty’s” true identity. … Gorham v. United States, 339 A.2d 401, 403, 410 (D.C.1975); see also Brown v. United States, 683 A.2d 118, 128 *489 (D.C.1996) (referring to the "obvious prejudicial effect" of evidence of drug use). .

Stanton v. Chase

497 A.2d 1066 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 1985

On February 15, 1983, this court’s Board of Professional Responsibility (the Board) recommended that appellant be suspended from the practice of law for one year and one day for neglecting, and opposing the interests of, … Stump v. Sparkman, supra, 435 U.S. at 362 , 98 S.Ct. at 1107-1108 ; see also Slavin v.

Ruffin v. United States

524 A.2d 685 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1987

Dyson arranged to have Ruffin picked up at his sister’s home by Officer James Brown at around noon that day. … Furthermore, like Williams, Brown added that Ruffin was not under arrest and that he had no reason to handcuff Ruffin. But also, like Williams, Brown did not testify that he had told Ruffin he was not under arrest.

Family Const. v. DC DEPT. OF C. & R. AFFAIRS

484 A.2d 250 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 1984

See, e.g., Tower v. … Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 413 A.2d 1276, 1280 (D.C.1980) (citations omitted).

District of Columbia v. Billingsley

667 A.2d 837 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1995

Safeway Stores, Inc., 225 A.2d 312, 314 (D.C.1967) (quoting from Brown v. Alabama Foods, Inc., 190 A.2d 257 (D.C.1963)); see also Hughes v. District of Columbia, 425 A.2d 1299, 1302 (D.C.1981). … Brown's responsibilities were elicited during testimony at trial. 7 .