Case law

Gillis v. United States

400 A.2d 311 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1979

Holmes, J., in Brown v. United States, 256 U.S. 335, 343 , 41 S.Ct. 501, 502 , 65 L.Ed. 961 (1921). And the same may be said of a pointed gun or even a clinched fist. … Brown v. United States, 256 U.S. 335 , 41 S.Ct. 501 , 65 L.Ed. 961 (1921); Beard v. United States, 158 U.S. 550 , 15 S.Ct. 962 , 39 L.Ed. 1086 (1895). 8 .

Hahn v. University of the District of Columbia

789 A.2d 1252 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 2002

Kegley v. District of Columbia, 440 A.2d 1013, 1019 (D.C.1982) (citation omitted); accord, e.g., Harrison v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia, 758 A.2d 19, 22 (D.C.2000); Stokes v. … See Board of Community College Trustees v.

Griffin v. United States

618 A.2d 114 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1992

Board of Public Instr. v. Cohen, 413 F.2d 1201, 1203 (5th Cir.1969). It is a volitional act. Spradling v. Deimeke, 528 S.W.2d 759, 766 (Mo.1975). … Brown, supra, 590 A.2d at 1013 .

Elam v. Ethical Prescription Pharmacy, Inc.

422 A.2d 1288 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1980

Brown v. Clancy, D.C.Mun.App., 43 A.2d 296, 298 (1945). [3] At that moment, appellant's attention was directed forward. … Brown v.

Rifkind v. Turner

52 A.2d 501 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1947

Thrailkill v. Crosbyton-Southplains R. Co., 8 Cir., 246 F. 687 ; Hale v. Brown, 211 Ala. 106 , 99 So. 645 , affirmed 215 Ala. 177 , 110 So. 376 ; Brutinel v. … Hale v. Brown, supra; 12 C.J.S., Broker's, § 80, p. 176, n. 27; Mechem on Agency, 2d Ed. 1146, n. 82; Compare White v. Douglas Robinson, 153 App. Div. 776 , 138 N.Y.S. 992 ; Giles v.

Page Associates v. District of Columbia

463 A.2d 649 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 27, 1983

Keefe Co. v. *656 District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 409 A.2d 624, 625-26 (D.C.1979). … We conclude, as a matter of law, that the finding of the Board of Zoning Adjustment that appellants’ applications were not grandfathered by § 8104.7 is so clearly erroneous as to require reversal. Keefe Co. v.

Fletcher v. Fletcher

134 A.2d 590 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 1957

In Williams v. … Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309, 310 , 122 F.2d 219, 220 .

Matter of Gorfkle

444 A.2d 934 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1982

Brown. Q. Now, directing your attention to approximately 10:00 p. m. after Mr. Brown had left and returned with some wine— MR. BIRNEY: Objection, Your Honor. THE COURT: Sustained. That’s rank leading, Miss Gorfkle. MS. … Brown do or say? A. He mentioned something about his wallet was missing. Q. Do you know what his exact words were? A.

Zegeye v. Liss

70 A.3d 1208 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 2013

Shaff v. Skahill, 617 A.2d 960, 963 (D.C.1992) (citation omitted). … The Arbitration Board’s Rule of Procedure 19(m) is unequivocal on the matter: Hearings are neither transcribed nor recorded by [the Arbitration Board].

Randolph v. United States

882 A.2d 210 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2005

Brown v. United States, 840 A.2d 82, 89 (D.C.2004). The statement here at issue presents the precise converse of what is permitted under Brown ; it provides details of the crime, but no identification of the culprits. … In United States v.

Owens v. United States

688 A.2d 399 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1996

See Brown v. United States, 627 A.2d at 499 (D.C.1993). It is clear that the brief instruction was not prejudicial, and in fact was helpful, because Owens’ alias could have been properly admissible on other grounds. … United States, 399 A.2d 21, 28 (D.C.1979) (quoting Brown v. United States, 244 A.2d 487, 490 (D.C.1968)). On this record, there is no showing of an abuse of the court’s discretion. .

Wilson v. United States

711 A.2d 75 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 7, 1998

In Winfield v. United States, 676 A.2d 1 (D.C.1996) (en banc), which was decided after Wilson’s trial, this court replaced the “clearly linked” standard articulated in the Brown-Beale principle. … Brown v. United States, 409 A.2d 1093, 1097 (D.C.1979), and Beale v. United States, 465 A.2d 796, 803 (D.C.1983).

Hardy v. United States

988 A.2d 950 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 2010

Leaning heavily on Brown v. United States, 795 A.2d 56 (D.C.2002), Mr. … Shepard v.

McDaniels v. United States

718 A.2d 530 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 3, 1998

See Brown v. United States, 546 A.2d 390, 395 (D.C.1988); Logan v. United States, 489 A.2d 485, 491 (D.C.1985). The attempted concealment of this weapon could not have been done without appellant’s active participation. … See Taylor v.

Mason v. Director of Motor Vehicles

186 A.2d 893 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 1962

provides: “No owner of * * * a motor vehicle in the District of Columbia shall allow or permit the same to be operated by any individual who is not a duly licensed operator.” 2 .Code 1961, §§ 40-302, 40-602(a); La Forest v. … Board of Commissioners, 67 App.D.C. 396 , 92 F.2d 547 (1937). 3 . Part V, Traffic & Motor Vehicle Regulations of the District of Columbia. 4 . La Forest v. Board of Commissioners, supra n. 2 .

Young v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

918 A.2d 427 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 2007

“The Board had authority to reverse the AU’s order only if it was unsupported by substantial evidence or was legally incorrect.” Darden, 911 A.2d at 415 ; see also Gary v. … Hosp. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 881 A.2d 567 (D.C.2005) (latex allergy); Wash. Post v.

Peoples v. United States

640 A.2d 1047 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 3, 1994

Perkins, supra, 446 A.2d at 24 ; see also Edwards v. United States, 583 A.2d 661, 669 (D.C.1990); Wynn v. United States, 538 A.2d 1139, 1145 (D.C.1988); Brown v. … We are bound by the court’s decision in Brown as well as Perkins. See M.A.P. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310, 312 (D.C.1971). 8 .

Ifill v. District of Columbia

665 A.2d 185 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 1995

See Lipsett v. … For example, in Hartman v. Board of Trustees of Community College Dist.

McCraney v. United States

983 A.2d 1041 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 2009

See id.; see also Brown v. … Irick v. United States, 565 A.2d 26, 31 (D.C.1989) (emphasis in the original). 50 . United States v. Brown, 700 A.2d 760, 763-64 (D.C.1997). 51 . Id. 52 .

Wright v. McCann

122 A.2d 334 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1956

Co. v. Peeler, 8 Cir., 140 F.2d 865 ; Co-Efficient Foundation v. Woods, 5 Cir., 171 F.2d 691 . 5 . Backus v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass’n, D.C.Mun.App., 96 A.2d 513 ; Hornbeck v. Dain Mfg. Co., D.C.S.D. … Joyce v. L. P. Steuart, Inc., D.C.Cir., 227 F.2d 407 ; American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. v. Morris, D.C.W.Va., 51 F.Supp. 889 , affirmed Simon v. American Casualty Co., 4 Cir., 146 F.2d 208 ; Woods v.