Case law

Cunningham v. United States

974 A.2d 240 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2009

See Brown v. … See Coles v. United States, 808 A.2d 485, 489 (D.C.2002); see also Brown, supra, 683 A.2d at 124 (citing Ford v. United States, 549 A.2d 1124, 1126 (D.C.1988)).

Gabrielian v. Gabrielian

473 A.2d 847 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1984

Gabrie-lian was not present at this meeting, 1 and was not selected to serve in any capacity on Cratina’s board. Mr. … Code Ann. § 3-101(a) (1981 Repl.Vol.); see Bourke v. Krick, 304 F.2d 501, 503 (4th Cir.1962); Kingsley v. Makay, 253 Md. 24, 27 , 251 A.2d 585, 587 (1969); Nickel v. Brown, 75 Md. 172, 185 , 23 A. 736, 739 (1892).

Newman v. United States

705 A.2d 246 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 1997

Brown v. United States, 409 A.2d 1093, 1097 (D.C.1979) (emphasis added); accord Beale v. United States, 465 A.2d 796, 803 (D.C.1983). Later, in Johnson v. … Brown v. United States, 409 A.2d 1093 (D.C.1979). . Beale v. United States, 465 A.2d 796 (D.C.1983). . Drew v. United States, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 11 , 331 F.2d 85 (1964). . See supra note 5. . Winfield v.

Eaton v. Karr

251 A.2d 640 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1969

Boone v. Boone, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 152 , 150 F.2d 153 (1945) [hereinafter cited *642 as Boone]; Kirk v. Kirk, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 183 , 150 F.2d 589 (1945); Brown v. Brown, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 73 , 134 F.2d 505 (1942); Mazur v. … Winter v.

Grant v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

490 A.2d 1115 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1985

Williams v. District of Columbia Unemployment *1117 Compensation Board, 383 A.2d 345, 350-51 (D.C.1978). See also Jones v. … Hickenbottom v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, 273 A.2d 475, 477 (D.C.1971) (citation omitted); accord Colton v.

In Re Luvara

942 A.2d 1125 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 2008

Reconsideration was denied on March 13, 2007. 1 Neither respondent nor Bar Counsel takes exception to the Board’s recommendation. … (v) The actor has suffered any prior conviction for any violation of this section or any predecessor law hereto, or has been convicted, under any Federal statute or statute of any other state, of an act which would be a violation

Davidson v. United States

48 A.3d 194 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 2012

Byrd v. United States, 598 A.2d 386, 388-89 (D.C.1991) (en banc); see also Brown v. … See Brown v.

In Re Schoeneman

777 A.2d 259 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 26, 2001

The Board thus erred in finding neglect. … See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 733 , 113 S.Ct. 1770 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993) (defining waiver as the "intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right”) (quoting Johnson v.

Boyce v. Boyce

541 A.2d 614 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 11, 1988

See Jurek v. Jurek, 124 Ariz. 596, 598 , 606 P.2d 812, 814 (1980); Brown v. Brown, 100 Wash.2d 729, 738-739 , 675 P.2d 1207, 1213 (1984). … See, e.g., In re Brown, 15 Cal.3d 838, 841-842 , 544 P.2d 561, 562-563 , 126 Cal.Rptr. 633, 634-635 (1976); In re Hunt, 78 Ill.App.3d 653, 658-659 , 34 Ill.Dec. 55, 60 , 397 N.E.2d 511, 516 (1979); Flynn v.

Zegeye v. Liss

70 A.3d 1208 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 2013

Shaff v. Skahill, 617 A.2d 960, 963 (D.C.1992) (citation omitted). … The Arbitration Board’s Rule of Procedure 19(m) is unequivocal on the matter: Hearings are neither transcribed nor recorded by [the Arbitration Board].

Washington Post Co. v. District of Columbia

596 A.2d 517 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 1991

See Glen Wall Assocs. v. … Sunday Lake Iron Co. v.

CHH CAPITAL HOTEL PARTNERS, LP v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

152 A.3d 591 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 2017

CHH next appealed to the Board of Real Property Assessments and Appeals4 (“BRPAA” or “the Board”). … Hovermale’s assessments, as submitted to the Board. Though, regrettably, there is no indication why the Board departed below Mr.

Nelson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

530 A.2d 1193 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 1987

Arthur v. District of Columbia Nurses’ Examining Board, 459 A.2d 141 , 145 n. 7 (D.C.1983). … District Unemployment Compensation Board, 395 A.2d 392, 395 (D.C.1978); District Unemployment Compensation Board v.

Radbod v. Mohim Superior Court

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 2022

Id. at 1158.  11 The Board of Judges of the Superior Court subsequently adopted, verbatim, a 2010 amendment to Rule 56(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. … Brown v. Brown, 343 A.2d 59, 61 (D.C. 1975). One well established exception is the full or partial performance by a person relying on an oral contract disposing of an interest in land. See, e.g., Interdonato v.

Hahn v. University of the District of Columbia

789 A.2d 1252 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 2002

Kegley v. District of Columbia, 440 A.2d 1013, 1019 (D.C.1982) (citation omitted); accord, e.g., Harrison v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia, 758 A.2d 19, 22 (D.C.2000); Stokes v. … See Board of Community College Trustees v.

Genstar Stone Products Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

777 A.2d 270 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 26, 2001

Id. at 33. 9 Subsequent decisions by the Benefits Review Board likewise reflected its view that Az-zolino had not settled the issue. See Employers Nat’l Ins. Co. v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. … Programs, 17 B.R.B.S. 47, 53, BRB No. 83-2840 (1985) (“The Board has never held that an employer may not seek post-settlement Section 8(f) relief.”) (italics in original); Brady v. J. Young and Co.

Elam v. Ethical Prescription Pharmacy, Inc.

422 A.2d 1288 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1980

Brown v. Clancy, D.C.Mun.App., 43 A.2d 296, 298 (1945). [3] At that moment, appellant's attention was directed forward. … Brown v.

George Hyman Construction Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

498 A.2d 563 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1985

Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535, 539-40 , 79 S.Ct. 968, 972-73 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1959); Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, 443 A.2d 507, 513 (D.C.1981). … Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 216 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938); Nova University v.

In Re Mirrer

632 A.2d 117 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1993

See People v. … In People v.

Randolph v. United States

882 A.2d 210 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2005

Brown v. United States, 840 A.2d 82, 89 (D.C.2004). The statement here at issue presents the precise converse of what is permitted under Brown ; it provides details of the crime, but no identification of the culprits. … In United States v.