Case law

Spriggs v. United States

52 A.3d 878 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 2012

In Davis v. State, the defendant entered his home with Lawrence Brown, and together they raped the defendant’s wife. 611 So.2d 906, 908-09 (Miss.1992). … Brown’s entry, “and therefore Brown’s entry was not burglarious,” and he could not be found guilty as an accessory. Id. at 911 .

Smith v. District of Columbia

336 A.2d 831 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1975

In Fisher v. … See also Euge v. Trantina, 422 F.2d 1070, 1074 (8th Cir. 1970); Fox v. City of West Palm Beach, 383 F.2d 189, 195 (5th Cir. 1967); Brown v. Village of Deming, 56 N.M. 302 , 243 P.2d 609, 618 (1952); Chappell v.

Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Washington v. Covington

484 A.2d 589 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1984

See also, e.g., Jones v. Grant, 344 So.2d 1210, 1212 (Ala.1977) (granting standing to a group of plaintiffs with a special interest in the enforcement of a charitable trust); Lokey v. … Wieck v. Sterenbuch, supra, 350 A.2d at 388 . The movant must provide clear and convincing evidence that the threat exists. In re Antioch University, supra, 418 A.2d at 109 (citing Vargas v.

In re J. J.

431 A.2d 587 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 28, 1981

Board of Education to place J. J. at New Dominion. … J.], a minor by his mother and next friend Joyce Johnson v. D.C. Board of Education, (D.D.C., No. 80-0897, filed Apr. 8, 1980). .

In re Doman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 16, 2024

See, e.g., Chaudhry v. Gallerizzo, 174 F.3d 394, 402 (4th Cir. 1999) (“Typically, the attorney-client privilege does not extend to billing records and expense reports. ... … Board.

Ali v. United States

581 A.2d 368 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 1990

Appellant testified that he gave Marshall Manning a brown bag (a brown, leather tool bag of a lighter shade of brown than the brown bag he received from Dickens for Christmas) containing tools and jumper cables on February … See, e.g., McQueen v.

Harris v. District of Columbia Commission on Human Rights

562 A.2d 625 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 1989

District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 437 A.2d 176, 178-79 (D.C.1981) *632 (an agency generally is free to credit, 5 without explanation, non-expert testimony of a witness). … As Judge Brown stated for the court in Burns v. Thiokol Chemical Corp., 483 F.2d 300, 305 (5th Cir.1973): “In the problem of racial discrimination, statistics often tell much, and Courts listen.” Alabama v.

Dubose, DDS v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 2023

See, e.g., Pollack v. U.S. … Featherson v. Educ.

United States v. Jones

275 A.2d 541 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1971

United States v. Cumberland, D.C.App., 262 A.2d 341, 343 (1970). … Co., 391 U.S. 216 , 88 S.Ct. 1472 , 20 L.Ed.2d 538 (1968), Preston v.

Ripalda v. American Operations Corp.

673 A.2d 659 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1996

Sitwell v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 263 A.2d 262, 263 (D.C.1970); see also Brown v. Cohen, 505 A.2d 77, 79 (D.C.1986); Beck-with v. Beckwith, 379 A.2d 955, 958 (D.C. 1978); Shakesnider v. … Sitwell, 263 A.2d at 264 ; see also Brown, 505 A.2d at 79 (plaintiffs duty to prosecute action even though case may not yet be at issue); Cameron v. Washington Metro. Area Trans.

Moore v. United States

359 A.2d 299 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1976

Brown, supra. … See United States v. Brown, supra. 8 . Appellant, of course consented to the first continuance.

Giles v. United States

432 A.2d 739 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1981

United States, supra (same, where identity is the sole issue); United States v. Brown, supra (same). … Brown, supra (same).

Thomas v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

490 A.2d 1162 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1985

Gosch v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services, 484 A.2d 956, 958 (D.C.1984); Worrell v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 382 A.2d 1036, 1038 (D.C.1978); Gaskins v. … District Unemployment Compensation Board, 315 A.2d 567, 568 (D.C.1974).

Davis v. University of the District of Columbia

603 A.2d 849 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1992

Public Employee Relations Board v. Washington Teachers’ Union Local 6, 556 A.2d 206, 207 (D.C.1989) (citing cases); Grant v. District of Columbia, 545 A.2d 1262 (D.C.1988). … Id at 180 (quoting Wells v. District of Columbia Board of Education, 386 A.2d 703, 706 (1978)).

CHH CAPITAL HOTEL PARTNERS, LP v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

152 A.3d 591 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 2017

CHH next appealed to the Board of Real Property Assessments and Appeals4 (“BRPAA” or “the Board”). … Hovermale’s assessments, as submitted to the Board. Though, regrettably, there is no indication why the Board departed below Mr.

In Re Lebowitz

944 A.2d 444 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 2008

As the Supreme Court of California explained in Stratmore v. … Gould v. State of Florida, 99 Fla. 662 , 127 So. 309, 311 (1930) (emphasis added). 2 .

In Re Luvara

942 A.2d 1125 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 2008

Reconsideration was denied on March 13, 2007. 1 Neither respondent nor Bar Counsel takes exception to the Board’s recommendation. … (v) The actor has suffered any prior conviction for any violation of this section or any predecessor law hereto, or has been convicted, under any Federal statute or statute of any other state, of an act which would be a violation

Stanford Hotels Corp. v. Potomac Creek Associates, L.P.

18 A.3d 725 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 2011

Clay v. Faison, 583 A.2d 1388, 1390 (D.C.1990) (citing Flack v. … See, e.g., Kesler v.

In Re Borders

665 A.2d 1381 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 1995

The facts of the crimes, which we do not detail here, are described in United States v. Borders, 693 F.2d 1318, 1319-24 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 905 , 103 S.Ct. 1875 , 76 L.Ed.2d 807 (1983). … The Hearing Committee and the Board agreed that the third and fourth Roundtree factors counsel against petitioner’s reinstatement.

Coleman v. United States

311 A.2d 496 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 1973

In contending for the application of the Housing Regulations, the tenants sought to bring into play in these cases the holding of this court in Brown v. … In Knox Hill Tenant Council v.