Case law

Morrison v. United States

579 A.2d 686 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1990

United States v. Brown, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 398, 401 , 428 F.2d 1100, 1103 (1970). … Brown v. United States, 379 A.2d 708 (D.C.1977). His reliance on Butler v. United States, 388 A.2d 883, 885 (D.C.1978), and Fallen v.

In Re Lenoir

585 A.2d 771 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1991

Bar Counsel points out that a three year statute of limitations would have applied to Holley v. … The Board, however, recommends that these two charges be dismissed due to a lack of clear and convincing proof. We agree with the Board’s recommendation as to these two charges.

Wood v. Neuman

979 A.2d 64 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2009

Henson v. … Huber v.

Nelson v. Nelson

379 A.2d 713 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1977

Spence v. Spence, D.C. App., 266 A.2d 29 (1970). … Compare, e.g., Brown v.

Franklin v. United States

204 A.2d 341 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 1964

Pettas v. United States, D.C.App., 203 A.2d 170, 172 (1964); Teresi v. United States, D.C.App., 187 A.2d 492, 493 (1963). … The suspect had been described as a “brown-skinned” colored man, 5' 7” or 5' 8” tall, 150 pounds, “very neatly” dressed, wearing a gray or black topcoat and a brown or gray hat.

Matter of Washington

513 A.2d 245 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 1986

See Caravel Office Building Co. v. Peruvian Air Attache, 347 A.2d 280, 283 (D.C.1976); see also Briggs v. Goodwin, 186 U.S. … See Board Rule 7.2, note 11 supra.

Farris v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 2021

(citing Johnson-El v. District of Columbia, 579 A.2d 163, 170 (D.C. 1990))). 7 Aziken v. District of Columbia, 194 A.3d 31, 34 (D.C. 2018). 8 Id. 9 Brown v. … Brown, 853 A.2d at 736; see also Motley-Ivey v. District of Columbia, 923 F.

Mason Hall Corp. v. Dicker

141 A.2d 190 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 12, 1958

to interpretation by a member of the board. … Shade v. Colgate, 4 N.J.Super. 356 , 67 A.2d 193, 195 , appeal dismissed 3 N.J. 91 , 69 A.2d 19 .

Burton v. Office of Employee Appeals

30 A.3d 789 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 2011

Hoey appealed to the Superior Court, which affirmed the Board’s decision, and this appeal followed. B. Appellant Burton The facts in Burton v. OEA are similar to those in Hoey v. OEA and we summarize them only briefly. … Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985) (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)).

United States v. Barnes

496 A.2d 1040 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1985

See Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 51-52 , 99 S.Ct. 2637, 2640-2641 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979) (no justification for seizing appellant seen walking away from another man in alley in area known for drug traffic); Robinson v. … United States v.

In re Kenneth A. Martin

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2014

The following authorities hold that funds need not be returned: Board of Prof’l Responsibility v. … Johnson Co. v.

Gilmore v. United States

648 A.2d 944 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1994

The officers saw Gilmore hand to Hubbard an object that later turned out to be a brown paper packet containing four ziplock bags of white powder. … McGrier v. United States, 597 A.2d 36, 41 (D.C.1991); Dixon v. United States, 565 A.2d 72, 78 (D.C.1989); see Watts v. United States, 362 A.2d 706, 709 (D.C.1976). (en banc) (defining plain error).

Nelson v. United States

649 A.2d 301 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1994

See Brown v. United States, 409 A.2d 1093, 1097 (D.C.1979). We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s ruling. … Brown, supra, 409 A.2d at 1097 .

Solers, Inc. v. Doe

977 A.2d 941 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 2009

Here, John Doe did not post his accusations on an internet bulletin board for thousands or perhaps millions of persons to see. Cf. Doe I v. … See, e.g., Dobbs v. Providence Hospital, 736 A.2d 216, 219 (D.C.1999) (plaintiff "appeals the dismissal of her case for failure to prosecute"); Brown v.

Colton v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

484 A.2d 550 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1984

District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, supra. We note also that the employer bears the burden of proof on the issue of misconduct. Keep v. … Jones v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, 395 A.2d 392, 395 (D.C.1978); accord, Jadallah v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services, supra, 476 A.2d at 675 ; Keep v.

Saunders v. First National Realty Corporation

245 A.2d 836 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 23, 1968

Where legal issues raised on appeal would be res judicata between the parties in a subsequent proceeding, an appeal should not be dismissed even though the main controversy has become moot. 1 In Brown v. … The first, made at oral argument, is that under our ruling in Brown v.

Smith v. Murphy

294 A.2d 357 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 15, 1972

(see footnote 4, supra), the *360 Board of Appeals and Review remanded the case to the Director of Motor Vehicles for reconsideration in light of Bell v. Bur-son, supra.. … MV-41, Aug. 12, 1971), the Board of Appeals and Review declined to treat the issues of confrontation, cross-examination and procedural rights in remanding that case to the Director for reconsideration in light of Bell v.

In Re Balsamo

780 A.2d 255 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 2001

See, e.g., United States v. Mangieri, 224 U.S.App. … See id. at 430 (citing Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 546 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985)).

Dell v. Department of Employment Services

499 A.2d 102 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1985

Saah v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 433 A.2d 1114, 1116 (D.C.1981) (citations omitted). … E.g., Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535, 539-540 , 79 S.Ct. 968, 972-973 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1959); Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, 443 A.2d 507, 513 (D.C.1981) (en banc). .

Craig v. United States

490 A.2d 1173 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1985

Hagner v. United States, 285 U.S. 427, 431 , 52 S.Ct. 417, 419 , 76 L.Ed.2d 861 (1932); Hackney v. … In United States v.