Case law

Jennings v. Gilbertson

74 A.2d 839 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1950

Hutchinson v. Peacock, D.C.Mun.App. 73 A.2d 903 . 3 . Lichter v. U. S„ 334 Ü.S. 742, 791, 68 S. Ct. 1294 , 92 L.Ed. 1694 ; see also Chambers v. Robertson, U.S.App.D.C., 183 F.2d 144 , decided June 12, 1950. 4 . … Seaboard & Western Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, U.S.App.D.C., - F.2d — decided June 5, 1950. 5 . Citing 52 Stat. 1024 , 49 U.S.C.A. § 646 (e). 6 . Code 1940, Supp. VII, 45—1609(b). 7 . Taylor v.

In Re Fogel

728 A.2d 668 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 6, 1999

“Because [Bar Counsel] has not filed any exceptions to the Board’s report and recommendation, this court’s already considerable deference to the Board’s determination ... is enhanced.” … See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct. 160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970)(guilty plea with assertion of factual innocence). 2 . Tr. 25-26 (Robinson); 45-47 (Garber); 61-65 (Ratner); 120-23 (Jacobs).

JOSE RODRIGUEZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

124 A.3d 134 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2015

See Freeman v. … Hensley v.

ROBERT M. ALEXANDER v. UNITED STATES

116 A.3d 444 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 2015

Brown v. United States, 900 A.2d 184, 189, 191 (D.C. 2006); see also id.at 188, 189, 190 n.12, 191 (explaining that in light of the 5 Moreover, there is authority that appears to be to the contrary. … See Brown, 900 A.2d at 191.

In re A.S.

614 A.2d 534 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 1992

Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1017 (D.C.1991) (citing Commonwealth v. Jackson, 459 Pa. 669, 673-673 , 331 A.2d 189, 191 (1975)). … Our decision in Brown v.

In re: Mikel D. Jones

97 A.3d 590 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 2014

United States v. Jones, CRIM.A. 11-261, 2012 WL 383668 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2012), aff’d, 544 F. App’x 87 (3d Cir. 2013). … United States v. Jones, 544 F. App’x 87 (3d Cir. 2013). We note that Mikel D.

In Re Wilkins

649 A.2d 557 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 1994

The Board follows the recommendation of the Hearing Committee. … Tucker v. Lower, 200 Kan. 1, 4 , 434 P.2d 320, 324 (1967). Thus, what may not legally be characterized as an act of fraud, deceit or misrepresentation may still evince dishonesty.

Watergate East Committee Against Hotel Conversion to Co-Op Apartments v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission

953 A.2d 1036 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 24, 2008

Brown v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 486 A.2d 37, 52 (D.C.1984) (en banc) (quotation omitted). … Brown v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 486 A.2d 37, 52 (D.C.1984) (en banc) (quotation omitted). 10 .

Innovative Institute v. DC Office of State Superintendent of Education

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 2024

See Cunningham v. … Fund, Inc. v.

Civic v. Signature Collision Centers, LLC & H.P. West End, LLC

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 2019

(citations omitted); District of Columbia v. … See Scoggins v.

Sisco v. GSA National Capital Federal Credit Union

689 A.2d 52 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1997

adoption annually by the newly constituted board. … In Elliott v.

Smith v. Murphy

294 A.2d 357 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 15, 1972

(see footnote 4, supra), the *360 Board of Appeals and Review remanded the case to the Director of Motor Vehicles for reconsideration in light of Bell v. Bur-son, supra.. … MV-41, Aug. 12, 1971), the Board of Appeals and Review declined to treat the issues of confrontation, cross-examination and procedural rights in remanding that case to the Director for reconsideration in light of Bell v.

IN RE J. MICHAEL FARREN

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2015

We accept the Board’s recommendation and disbar Mr. Farren. II. D.C. … State v. Murray, 757 A.2d 578, 583 (Conn. 2000).

In re Tun

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 2022

Myles V. Lynk, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, with whom Julia L. Porter, Deputy Disciplinary Counsel, was on the brief, for the Office of Disciplinary Counsel. … Slaughter if the Board had recommended it. Here, in contrast, the Board contends that disbarment is appropriate.

In re J.D.R.

637 A.2d 849 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1994

The trial judge expressly credited Officer Burke’s testimony and rejected that of appellant and Brown. … See Price v. United States, supra; Munn v.

Miller v. Spencer

330 A.2d 250 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1974

We disagree and affirm. in Brown v. … Brown v.

Jackson v. United States

819 A.2d 963 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 2003

See State v. … The court in People v.

Johnson v. United States

596 A.2d 980 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1991

Zanton Brown testified that just before the murder, Bullock had threatened her (Brown) while he had his hand on a pistol in his belt. He told her to move on or else he would “kill [her] ass, too.” … Frightened, Brown hastened away from the area. Linda Young stated that she heard Bullock threaten both Brown and Smith, demanding his money from Smith.

Eiland v. Ahearn

153 A.2d 312 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 21, 1959

In Stone v. Board of Examiners and Registrars of Architects, 2 we were asked to review an order of that Board revoking Stone’s registration as an architect under the provisions of Code 1951, § 2-1001 et seq. … that having renewed it annually the Board’s right to revoke his license was waived by it.

In re L.J.

546 A.2d 429 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 18, 1988

We have stressed before that crime prevention is “a weighty social objective,” Brown v. … See Brown v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 203, 207 , 338 F.2d 543, 547 (1964); Smith v. United States, 392 A.2d 990, 993 (D.C.1978).