Case law

In re Washington

513 A.2d 245 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 1986

If no exceptions are timely filed, the parties waive their rights to briefing and oral argument, and the Board takes action based on the record. Board Rule 13.4. … See Caravel Office Building Co. v. Peruvian Air Attache, 347 A.2d 280, 283 (D.C.1976); see also Briggs v. Goodwin, 186 U.S.

In Re Baker

579 A.2d 676 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 1990

.”); Roberts v. … District of Columbia Bd. of Medicine, 577 A.2d 319 (D.C.1990) (“although the Board’s requirement of a 75 passing grade may seem harsh when the applicant came close to that and was certified by another state, it is the Board

In re Tsai

860 A.2d 335 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 2004

In this disciplinary proceeding, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) has recommended that reciprocal and functionally identical discipline be imposed in the form of a public censure. … Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Tsai, 376 Md. 538 , 830 A.2d 910 (2003). 1 Respondent did not notify Bar Counsel of this Maryland order, as our rules require. See D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 11(b).

Newspapers, Inc. v. Metropolitan Police Department

546 A.2d 990 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 1988

See Tynes v. … Co. v.

Rizzi v. Fanelli

63 A.2d 872 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1949

Dick v. Marx and Rawolle, Inc., 55 App.D.C. 267 , 4 F.2d 879 ; Board of Trustees, etc., v. O. D. Wilson Co., 77 U.S.App.D.C. 127 , 133 F.2d 399 ; Portland Hotel Corporation v. Fidelity Storage Corporation, 77 U.S.App. … See also Whiting v. Davidge, 23 App.D.C. 156 , and Stanton v. Haskins, 8 D.C. 558 , 1 MacArthur 558 , 29 Am.Rep. 612 . Neary v. Markham, 10 Cir., 155 E.2d 485; Ridge v. Healy, 8 Cir., 251 E. 798; Skeen v.

Arneja v. Gildar

541 A.2d 621 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 11, 1988

Spellman v. American Security Bank, N.A., 504 A.2d 1119, 1122 (D.C.1986); Brown v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 490 A.2d 1125, 1126 (D.C.1985). … Id; see Brown v. Collins, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 68 , 71, 402 F.2d 209, 212 (1968).

United States v. Davis

387 A.2d 1091 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1978

Aguilar v. … Although Aguilar and Spinelli v.

Bourn v. United States

567 A.2d 1312 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 1989

Brown, supra, 288 A.2d at 456 (quoting Jett v. Jett, 221 A.2d 925, 927 (D.C.1966)). … See Brown v. United States, 542 A.2d 1231 (D.C.1988); Briscoe v. United States, 528 A.2d 1243 (D.C.1987).

District of Columbia v. Mattingly

28 App. D.C. 176 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1906

In the case of Ferguson v. Fallons, 2 Phila. 168 , the facts were almost identical with the facts in this case. … In the case of Hoffstot v.

In Re Marlow

652 A.2d 1111 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 1995

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Marlow, Misc.Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 16 (MD Dec. 8, 1992) (unreported) (“Marlow”) at 20. The suspension became effective on January 7, 1993, and concluded thirty days thereafter. … Although the Board did not specify which D.C.

In re Pye

57 A.3d 960 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 2012

V. Conclusion The Board recommends that the Court find Respondent to have violated Rules 1.1(b), 1.3(c), 1.5(a), 1.15(a), 1.15(b), 1.16(d), 8.4(c), and 8.4(d). … See, e.g., Godette v. Estate of Cox, 592 A.2d 1028, 1032 (D.C.1991) (citing Williams v.

In Re Dunietz

756 A.2d 437 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 2000

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Dunietz, Misc. No. AG-40 (Md. February 25, 1998) (unpublished order). … In due course the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) recommended to us that Mr.

Jennings v. Gilbertson

74 A.2d 839 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1950

Hutchinson v. Peacock, D.C.Mun.App. 73 A.2d 903 . 3 . Lichter v. U. S„ 334 Ü.S. 742, 791, 68 S. Ct. 1294 , 92 L.Ed. 1694 ; see also Chambers v. Robertson, U.S.App.D.C., 183 F.2d 144 , decided June 12, 1950. 4 . … Seaboard & Western Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, U.S.App.D.C., - F.2d — decided June 5, 1950. 5 . Citing 52 Stat. 1024 , 49 U.S.C.A. § 646 (e). 6 . Code 1940, Supp. VII, 45—1609(b). 7 . Taylor v.

In re Coles

912 A.2d 1168 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2006

Bar Rule XI, § 10(c), and directed the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) to institute a formal proceeding to determine the final discipline to be imposed and to decide if respondent’s crimes involved “moral turpitude … United States v. Terence Coles, No. 03-3113 (D.C.Cir. Jun. 23, 2006).

American University v. District of Columbia Department of Labor

429 A.2d 1374 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 1981

See Jones v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 395 A.2d 392 (1978); Green v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 346 A.2d 252 (1975). … See Williams v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C. App., 383 A.2d 345, 349 (1978); Hickenbottom v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 273 A.2d 475, 478 (1971).

Byrd v. Allstate Insurance Co.

622 A.2d 691 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1993

Brown v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 490 A.2d 1125, 1126 (D.C.1985); Holland, supra, 456 A.2d at 815 . … Co. v.

Edward M. Crough, Inc. v. Department of General Services

572 A.2d 457 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1990

(“Crough”), a general contractor, appeals from a decision by the Contract Appeals Board (the “Board”) of the Department of General Services of the District of Columbia, charging that the Board erred, inter alia, in denying … General Ship Corp. v. United States, 634 F.Supp. 868, 870 (D.Mass.1986). See also Paccon, Inc. v.

In Re Fogel

728 A.2d 668 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 6, 1999

“Because [Bar Counsel] has not filed any exceptions to the Board’s report and recommendation, this court’s already considerable deference to the Board’s determination ... is enhanced.” … See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct. 160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970)(guilty plea with assertion of factual innocence). 2 . Tr. 25-26 (Robinson); 45-47 (Garber); 61-65 (Ratner); 120-23 (Jacobs).

Innovative Institute v. DC Office of State Superintendent of Education

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 2024

See Cunningham v. … Fund, Inc. v.

JOSE RODRIGUEZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

124 A.3d 134 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2015

See Freeman v. … Hensley v.