Case law

In re B. D. T.

435 A.2d 378 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1981

On August 21, 1979, two juveniles, one in blue and one in brown, stopped Andre Wallace after following him for a while. Wallace had with him his father’s tape recorder. … Stagecrafters Club v. District of Columbia, D.C.App., 89 A.2d 876, 878 (1952). See also Doran v. United States, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 305 , 205 F.2d 717 (1953).

Verrett v. Stempson

623 A.2d 120 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1993

See Board of Pardons v. … Board of Pardons v. Allen, supra, 482 U.S. at 378-79, n. 10 , 107 S.Ct. at 2420-21, n. 10 (citations omitted). 11 .See Johnson-El v.

Bussie v. United States

81 A.2d 247 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1951

In Brown v. United States, D.C. … It has been so held by Chief Judge Laws of the United States District Court, United States v. Waters, 73 F.Supp. 72 , and once before by this court, Brown v. United States, D.C. Mun.App., 66 A.2d 491 .

Malone v. United States

729 A.2d 888 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 27, 1999

United States v. Brown, supra, 138 U.S.App.D.C. at 400-401 , 428 F.2d at 1102-1103 . … United States v. Brown, supra, 138 U.S.App.D.C. at 401 , 428 F.2d at 1103 (discussing Fed.R.Crim.P. 11, which is identical to Super.Ct.Crim.R. 11 in all relevant respects).

In Re Midlen

885 A.2d 1280 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 2005

“[DJishonesty,” includes “conduct evincing ‘a lack of honesty, probity or integrity in principle; a lack of fairness and straightforwardness.’ ” In re Shorter, 570 A.2d 760, 767-68 (D.C.1990) (quoting Tucker v. … V. Accepting the Board’s alternative recommendation, we suspend Midlen for eighteen months.

In Re Kline

11 A.3d 261 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 2011

However, “[w]hen the court disagrees with the Board as to the seriousness of the offense ... the Board’s recommendations are accordingly granted less weight.” … This action, styled The Ad Agency, Inc. v.

Rastall v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

697 A.2d 46 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1997

Sacks v. Rothberg, 569 A.2d 150, 154 (D.C.1990) (citing Dodek v. CF 16 Corp., 537 A.2d 1086 (D.C.1988)). … Brown v. United States, 567 A.2d 426, 427 (D.C.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1037 , 110 S.Ct. 1497 , 108 L.Ed.2d 632 (1990).

Bell v. United States

817 A.2d 829 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 2003

Bell v. United States, 801 A.2d 117, 120 (2002). … Rivas v. United States, 783 A.2d 125, 129 (D.C.2001) (en banc); Johnson v.

Sullivan v. Heritage Foundation

399 A.2d 856 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1979

See, e. g., Singh v. Cities Service Oil Co., 554 P.2d 1367, 1368 (Okl.1976); School Committee of Providence v. Board of Regents for Education, 112 R.I. 288 , 308 A.2d 788, 790 (1973). … The Board of Trustees may appoint such other officers as may be deemed neces *859 sary, such officers to be appointed either temporarily for a stated time or for the ensuing year and until the next annual meeting of the Board

In Re Haar

667 A.2d 1350 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1995

See Klingensmith, Inc. v. … See Crain v.

In re Tillerson

878 A.2d 1186 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 2005

The Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that George E. Tiller-son, III, a member of our Bar, be disbarred. … Till-erson v. United States, Nos. 02-CF-1438 & 03-CO-827, 869 A.2d 368 (D.C.2005) (Memorandum Opinion and Judgment). On March 2, 2005, the court vacated its prior stay.

District of Columbia Fire & Emergency Medical Services Department v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board and Local 36, International Association of Fire Fighters

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 2014

Tippett v. Daly, 10 A.3d 1123, 1126 (D.C. 2010) (quoting Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 144 (1995)). … Minis v. United States, 40 U.S. 423, 445 (1841); see also United States v. Vulte, 233 U.S. 509 (1914) (following Minis); Tennessee Valley Auth. v. Hill, 437 U.S. 153, 190 (1978).

MONTGOMERY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASS'N v. Baer

308 A.2d 768 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 10, 1973

Hawes, supra; Knott v. Jackson, D.C.Mun.App., 31 A.2d 662 (1942) ; Bowen v. Mount Vernon Sav. Bank, 70 App.D.C. 273 , 105 F.2d 796 (1939) ; Von Rosen v. Dean, 59 App.D.C. 359 , 41 F.2d 982 (1930) ; Brown v. … The Federal Reserve Board also required proration of “points” for the purpose of determining the “Annual Percentage Rate of Interest” ( 12 C.F.R. § 226.813 (Example II)) which must be disclosed to the borrower under the provisions

Jackson v. United States

395 A.2d 99 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1978

See Russell v. … See Anderson v. United States, D.C.App., 326 A.2d 807, 811 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 978 , 95 S.Ct. 1405 , 43 L.Ed.2d 659 (1975); Mitchell v. United States, D.C.App., 302 A.2d 216, 217 (1973); Brown v.

Dupont Circle Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission

426 A.2d 327 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 1981

See Dietrich v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 293 A.2d 470, 473 (1972); D.C.Code 1978 Supp., § 1-1509(e). … Morrison v. D. C. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 422 A.2d 347, 352 (1980) (reh. denied). 14 .

In Re Slattery

766 A.2d 561 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 2001

Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Md. v. Slattery, 351 Md. 240 , 718 A.2d 211 (1998). … XI, § 11(d), and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”).

In Re Gallagher

886 A.2d 64 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 2005

See In re Shieh, 738 A.2d 814, 816-17 (D.C.1999); Jerome Mgmt. v. District of Columbia Rental Hous. Comm’n, 682 A.2d 178, 183 (D.C.1996). … See, e.g., Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 59 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). Here, respondent has not argued defects in notice.

Stewart v. United States

687 A.2d 576 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1996

Brown observed the injured man enter a blue vehicle. Brown’s testimony was corroborated by another witness, Mr. Johnson. … See Cooke v. United States, 107 U.S.App. D.C. 223, 224, 275 F.2d 887, 888 (D.C.Cir.1960); Wilson v. United States, 91 U.S.App. D.C. 135, 136, 198 F.2d 299, 300 (D.C.Cir.1952); Townley v.

Hahn v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority

727 A.2d 317 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 1999

Carlisle v. … Co. v. Brown, 593 A.2d 184, 185 (D.C.1991)). In declining to vacate the summary judgment, the trial court did not abuse its discretion here.

In re Edwards

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 2022

Fox, III, Disciplinary Counsel, Myles V. Lynk, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, and Becky Neal, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for petitioner. … We conclude that the Board’s recommended sanction is reasonable and appropriate.