Case law

In Re Painter

766 A.2d 49 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 2001

Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Md. v. Painter, 356 Md. 293 , 739 A.2d 24 (1999). His disbarment was based on his long history of domestic violence. See id. … XI, § 11(d), and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”). The Board recommends identical reciprocal discipline of disbarment.

Kramer v. D. C. Department of Employment Services

447 A.2d 28 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1982

D.C.Code 1981, § 1-1510(a)(3)(E); see Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 377 A.2d 436, 439 (1977); Wallace v. … Department of Employment Services, supra; Deiss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 475 Pa. 547 , 381 A.2d 132 (1977).

Medina v. United States

61 A.3d 637 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 2013

Moore v. … In its brief, the government argued that appellant abandoned his claim for Sergeant Mercier’s alleged notes at trial and cites to Brown v. United States, 627 A.2d 499 (D.C.1993).

Dickens v. United States

19 A.3d 321 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 5, 2011

Brown left his car and asked appellant if he could talk to him, whereupon appellant “took off running.” Brown got back into his car to follow appellant while Officers Kenny and Foster chased him on foot. … See Holt v.

United States v. Neverson

12 D.C. 152 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1880

State v. … Craig, whom Brown had identified as the man who had been with him on the night of the murder,, that the said Brown had made the said statements to and the said requests of the said Craig at the time and place in the said

In re Bryant

46 A.3d 402 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2012

The events leading to Bryant’s convictions are set forth more fully in United States v. Bryant, 655 F.3d 232 (3d Cir.2011). … The Board finds respondent’s convictions involve moral turpitude per se and recommends disbarment. The Board’s recommendation is unopposed.

Matter of Sablowsky

529 A.2d 289 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 1987

Arthur v. District of Columbia Nurses’ Examining Bd., 459 A.2d 141, 146 (D.C.1983) (citing Liberty v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Bd., 410 A.2d 191, 194 (D.C.1979)). … Commonwealth v. Stump, 247 Ky. 589, 600-02 , 57 S.W.2d 524, 529 (1933).

In re Johnson

48 A.3d 170 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 2012

turpitude. 1 We adopt the Board’s unopposed recommendation. … Evans v. United States, 504 U.S. 255, 268 , 112 S.Ct. 1881 , 119 L.Ed.2d 57 (1992).

In Re Blum

859 A.2d 633 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 2004

XI, § 11(d) and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”). The Board now recommends the réspondent be disbarred as reciprocal discipline. … XI, § 11(c), and our heightened deference to the Board when its recommendation is unopposed, see id. at § 11(f), we adopt the Board’s recommendation.

In Re McGowan

827 A.2d 31 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 2003

Attorney Grievance Commission v. McGowan, Misc. No. AG-4 (Md.March7, 2002) (unreported). Bar Counsel filed with this court a certified copy of the Maryland disbarment order. … Bar Rule XI, § 11(d), 1 and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”). The Board has now recommended that respondent be reciprocally disbarred.

Pittman v. United States

375 A.2d 16 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 1977

Appellant was carrying, concealed in the leg of his trousers, a twelve-gauge sawed-off shotgun he had removed from a brown leather shoulder bag and assembled. … In the bedroom the officer went to the open closet and saw on the shelf a brown leather bag with something looking like a pipe or barrel protruding an inch or more from the bag.

In re Edwards

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 2022

Fox, III, Disciplinary Counsel, Myles V. Lynk, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, and Becky Neal, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for petitioner. … We conclude that the Board’s recommended sanction is reasonable and appropriate.

International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

388 A.2d 36 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1978

Rich v. Sills, supra at 922 . … For example, in Bussie v.

Atkins v. Industrial Telecommunications Ass'n

660 A.2d 885 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1995

Events Leading up to Atkins’s Termination At a September 1991 Spectrum Board meeting, Mr. … See Sanchez v.

In Re Robertson

608 A.2d 756 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 15, 1992

On April 8, 1988, Respondent filed a notice of appeal in United States v. Jan M. … Respondent filed a notice of appeal in United States v. Lawrence Michael Branch on May 20, 1988.

Goldberg v. Roumel

40 A.2d 253 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 1944

Brown v. Randle & Garvin, D.C.Mun.App., 32 A.2d 104 . Merchants’ Bank v. Affholter, 140 Ark. 480 , 215 S.W. 648 ; Congregation B’Nai Israel v. Dymytruk, 129 Conn. 415 , 28 A.2d 872 ; Harris v. … Minick v. Associates Inv. Co., 71 App.D.C. 367 , 110 F.2d 267 . Kunkel v. Brown, 4 Cir., 99 F. 593 ; Ross v.

MONTGOMERY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASS'N v. Baer

308 A.2d 768 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 10, 1973

Hawes, supra; Knott v. Jackson, D.C.Mun.App., 31 A.2d 662 (1942) ; Bowen v. Mount Vernon Sav. Bank, 70 App.D.C. 273 , 105 F.2d 796 (1939) ; Von Rosen v. Dean, 59 App.D.C. 359 , 41 F.2d 982 (1930) ; Brown v. … The Federal Reserve Board also required proration of “points” for the purpose of determining the “Annual Percentage Rate of Interest” ( 12 C.F.R. § 226.813 (Example II)) which must be disclosed to the borrower under the provisions

Robinson v. DIAMOND HOUSING CORPORATION

267 A.2d 833 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 1970

Robinson defended on the ground that the lease was void and unenforceable under the principle set forth in Brown v. Southall Realty Co., D.C.App., 237 A.2d 834 (1968), and we affirmed the judgment in her favor. … In other words, her Edwards v. Habib defense was barred by the granting of the motion. In Diamond Housing, supra, we stated that [wjhen it is established that a lease is void and unenforceable under the Brown v.

Thorn v. Walker

912 A.2d 1192 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2006

In Brown v. Hornstein, 669 A.2d 139 (D.C.1996), a landlord moved to gain possession of residential property due to the tenant’s late and delinquent rent payment history. … .’ ” Wright, 856 A.2d at 1110 (quoting Brown, 669 A.2d at 141 ) (other citation omitted).

In Re Matzkin

665 A.2d 1388 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 1995

See United States v. Matzkin, 14 F.3d 1014 (4th Cir.1994). We received a certified copy of the Fourth Circuit’s decision on December 7, 1994. … On November 30, 1994, in a written response to the Board’s recommendation, respondent asked this court to defer acting on the Board’s recommendation until the Fourth Circuit ruled on his motion.