Case law

In re Haines and In re Campoamor-Sanchez

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 2025

See Giglio v. … Andrews v. United States, 179 A.3d 279, 287 (D.C. 2018) (quoting Miller v. United States, 14 A.3d 1094, 1115 (D.C. 2011)).

In re Haines and In re Campoamor-Sanchez

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 2025

See Giglio v. … Andrews v. United States, 179 A.3d 279, 287 (D.C. 2018) (quoting Miller v. United States, 14 A.3d 1094, 1115 (D.C. 2011)).

DeSipio v. DeSipio

186 A.2d 624 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1962

Howard v. Howard, 72 App.D.C. 145 , 112 F.2d 44 ; Reed v. Reed, 52 App.D.C. 35 , 280 F. 1009 ; Shelton v. Shelton, D.C. Mun.App., 153 A.2d 663 . . Gill v. Gill, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 357, 359 , 147 F.2d 154 . . Melvin v. … Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309 , 122 F.2d 219 ; Miller v. Miller, D.C.Mun.App., 180 A.2d 888, 890; Johnson v. Johnson, D.C.Mun.App., 179 A.2d 720, 721 . . Foley v. Foley, D.C.Mun.App., 184 A.2d 853 . . Wheeler v.

Ford v. United States

498 A.2d 1135 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 23, 1985

She waved and beckoned to passing motorists, but never attempted to hail a cab or to board a bus. She did not hand out leaflets or conduct a survey. … Brown v. Municipality of *1140 Anchorage, 584 P.2d 35 (Alaska 1978) (statute permitted conviction of known prostitute who had not committed any overt act); People v.

Smith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment

494 A.2d 1340 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 1985

See 5 U.S.C. § 8128 (b)(1), (2) (1982); Mason v. District of Columbia, 395 A.2d 399, 402 (D.C.1978) (discussing federal statute); Reep v. United States, 557 F.2d 204, 207 (9th Cir.1977); Joyce v. … United States, 474 F.2d 215, 218 (3d Cir.1973); Bailey v. United States, Through the Department of the Army, 451 F.2d 963, 965 (5th Cir.1971); Gunston v.

ARTHUR G. NEWMYER v. THE SIDWELL FRIENDS SCHOOL and JAMES F. HUNTINGTON

128 A.3d 1023 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 2015

Hedgepeth v. … See Homan v.

East Capitol View Community Development Corp. v. Robinson

941 A.2d 1036 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 2008

Psychiatric Inst. of Wash. v. Allen, 509 A.2d 619, 625 (D.C.1986) (citations omitted). Further, a jury instruction is “not warranted without some evidence to support it.” Brown v. … See Thoma v.

Singer v. Doyle

236 A.2d 436 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1967

Phillips v. D. C. Transit System, Inc., D.C.App., 198 A.2d 740, 741 (1964); Mitchell v. Allied Cab Co., D.C.Mun.App., 133 A.2d 477, 479 (1957); Brown v. Clancy, D.C.Mun.App., 43 A.2d 296, 298 (1945). … Brown v. Clancy, D.C.Mun.App., 43 A.2d 296, 298 (1945). 3 .Sec. 47. Vehicle Turning Left at or Between Intersections.

In Re Krowen

573 A.2d 786 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1990

Pursuant to this statute the District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility (Board) recommends disbarment of Jer-ril J. … United States v.

National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States v. District of Columbia

498 A.2d 574 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 1985

Code § 47-3303 ; see also D.C.Code § 47-839; District of Columbia v. … In District of Columbia v.

MEDSTAR HEALTH, INC. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE HEALTH PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY

146 A.3d 360 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 2016

In their initial briefs, MedStar and DHP addressed21 whether SHPDA’s decision to deny a certificate of need was 19 For this proposition, the OAH ALJ cited Brown v. … Bd., 55 A.3d 894, 899 (D.C. 2012) (acknowledging special deference owed to the Public Charter School Board in light of its expertise in education policy); cf. MorphoTrust USA, Inc. v.

District of Columbia v. Sullivan

436 A.2d 364 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1981

In District of Columbia v. … [Capitol Hill Restoration Society, Inc. v. Moore, D.C.App., 410 A.2d 184, 188 (1979) (citations omitted); see Wells v. District of Columbia Board of Education, D.C.App., 386 A.2d 703, 706 (1978).]

Taylor v. Washington

808 A.2d 770 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 2002

Guerra v. … Board of Parole and transferred parole responsibility for District of Columbia prisoners to the United States Parole Commission. See D.C.Code § 24-131 (2001). 2 . Similarly, see Vasquez v.

Darab v. United States

623 A.2d 127 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 1993

In Riley v. … The evidence showed that the Board of Governors vested Dr.

In Re Karr

722 A.2d 16 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 1998

See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 689 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); In re Thorup, 432 A.2d 1221, 1226 (D.C.1981). … See *24 Beckman v. Farmer, 579 A.2d 618, 628 (D.C.1990). The Board also concludes that no partnership existed.

In re L.C.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 2025

v. … Moreover, there was evidence in Brown that the decedent was armed with a knife, had twice previously assaulted Mr. Brown with a knife, had threatened to kill Mr. Brown, and had been coming toward Mr.

Fateh v. Rich

481 A.2d 464 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 1984

See Thompson v. Rector, 83 U.S. … See Shear v.

District of Columbia v. Montgomery

453 A.2d 808 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1982

We reject appellees’ argument that there is a meaningful distinction between the situation in Carey v. … Here, as in Carey v. Piphus and in D.C. v. Gray, the agency’s action was defective because the requisite procedure was not followed.

RUTLAND COURT OWNERS, INC. v. Taylor

997 A.2d 706 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 2010

Lawlor v. District of Columbia, 758 A.2d 964, 974 (D.C.2000). The court’s judgment based on the facts will not be disturbed unless it is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it. Langon v. … Id. at 1121 (citing Radecki v. Joura, 114 F.3d 115, 116 (8th Cir.1997)).

In Re Glass

805 A.2d 236 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 2002

Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Md. v. Glass, 365 Md. 319 , 778 A.2d 1107 (2001). … XI, § 11(d), and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility “Board”. The Board has recommended imposition of identical reciprocal discipline.