Case law

Kelly v. United States

580 A.2d 1282 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 1990

Agent Sauve then stepped closer to Kelly and Beard, reached into the shopping bag, and took out the brown paper bag. … When you have a brown paper bag in a shoe of something you are carrying, and you say, “I don’t know,” that immediately, I think, gives rise to a suspicion that it is contraband. Citing United States v.

Hessey v. Burden

584 A.2d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 8, 1990

In District of Columbia v. … In District of Columbia v.

In Re Sawyer

953 A.2d 1019 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 17, 2008

No exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation have been filed. … Sawyer v. Kentucky Bar Association, File No.2007-SC-000297-KB (June 21, 2007). 3 . See Kentucky Supreme Court Rule 3.130-8.3(b) and its identical equivalent in D.C. Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4(b).

Thomas v. Buckley

176 A.3d 1277 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 2017

See Logan v. … In the context of historic landmark preservation, the Historic Preservation Review Board “is empowered to ‘designate and; maintain a current inventory of historic landmarks-’” Embassy Real Estate Holdings, LLC v.

In Re Schneider

553 A.2d 206 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1989

The Board unanimously recommends to us a six-month suspension. Schneider makes two arguments before us attacking the recommendation of the Board. … Stratmore v.

Matter of Solerwitz

601 A.2d 1083 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1992

By the same order, we directed the Board on Professional Responsibility to institute a formal proceeding to determine the nature of the final discipline to be imposed; we requested the Board specifically to review the elements … See People v. Gorton, 60 Misc.2d 833 , 304 N.Y.S.2d 69 (1969) (removing magazine from library because it contained what defendant regarded as obscene passage lacked felonious intent necessary to establish larceny).

Culp v. United States

486 A.2d 1174 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 1985

Jackson v. United States, 357 A.2d 409, 411 (D.C. 1976). Such a defense, however, “must have some reasonable basis.” Id.; Gaetano v. … McGloin v. United States, 232 A.2d 90, 91 (D.C.1967).

Kincade v. Wah

38 A.2d 112 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1944

Larsen v. Northland Transportation Co., 292 U.S. 20 , 54 S.Ct. 584 , 78 L.Ed, 1096; Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309 , 122 F.2d 219 ; Smith & Gottlieb, Inc. v. Cheatham, D.C. Mun.App., 31 A.2d 676 ; Scholl et al. v. … Bedrosian v. Wong Kok Chung, D.C.Mun.App., 33 A.2d 811 . The judgment is reversed with instructions to grant a new trial. Reversed. Code 1940, § 11—735.

McLean v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

506 A.2d 1135 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1986

Arthur v. District of Columbia Nurses’ Examining Board, 459 A.2d 141, 146 (D.C.1983) (citing In re Dwyer, 399 A.2d 1, 12 (D.C.1979); Monaco v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning, 409 A.2d 1067, 1070 (D.C.1979)). … E.g., Pendleton v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, 449 A.2d 301, 307 (D.C.1982).

In Re Cloud

939 A.2d 653 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2007

Cloud argues should have been considered by the Board, the evidence was more than sufficient to support its findings and, in light of such cases as Anderson and Utley , its recommendation. V. … See Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Reid, 666 A.2d 41, 42-44 (D.C.1995). 3 . Ms. Dean was offered the $24,000 settlement as a result of negotiations by her previous attorney, Kathleen Dolan.

In Re Berryman

764 A.2d 760 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2000

See Berryman v. Thorne, 700 A.2d 181 (D.C.1997). The Hearing Committee found that, “by depositing the estate funds of $939.84 into the Citizens Account, [Ms. … Inst. of Architects v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 594 A.2d 83, 87 (D.C.1991)). Thus, the Board owed no deference to the Hearing Committee’s finding of negligent misappropriation.

In re Nathaniel H. Speights

189 A.3d 205 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 26, 2018

Bar Ass’n v. … V. We consider, finally, the Board‟s recommendation of a two-year suspension coupled with a required showing of fitness.

District of Columbia v. Fisher

258 A.2d 456 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 1969

the authority to review decisions made by the Board of Appeals and Review. … We hold that the government is collaterally estopped to re-litigate this issue in a criminal prosecution against appellee. 8 United States v. Baltimore & O. R. R., 229 U.S. 244 , 33 S. Ct. 850 , 57 L.Ed. 1169 (1913).

Jackson v. United States

232 A.2d 576 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 10, 1967

See also Brown v. United States [ 125 U.S.App.D.C. 220 , 370 F.2d 485 ] No. 20,041, Decided November 10, 1966. … Walker v. United States, 124 U.S.App. D.C. 194, 363 F.2d 681 (1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 922 , 87 S.Ct. 922 , 17 L. Ed.2d 794 (1967); Hood v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 16 , 365 F.2d 949 (1966) ; Brown v.

Bostic v. Henkels and McCoy, Inc.

748 A.2d 421 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 2000

See also Chance v. … See also Gerber v.

Davis v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

481 A.2d 128 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 1984

See Richland School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 459 A.2d 1358, 1360 (Pa.Cmwlth.1983); Patrick v. … See Bornstein v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 69 Pa.Cmwlth. 521, 523-24 , 451 A.2d 1053, 1055 (1982); Hansen v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 54 Pa.

In re Farren

118 A.3d 217 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2015

PER CURIAM: The District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility *218 recommends that respondent J. Michael Farren be disbarred. We accept the Board’s recommendation. I. … State v. Murray, 254 Conn. 472 , 757 A.2d 578, 583 (2000).'

In re Paul

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 2023

.”); Krouse v. … See Imbler v.

In Re Zeiger

692 A.2d 1351 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1997

Bar Counsel supports the Board’s report and recommendation. … Molovinsky v. Monterey Cooperative, Inc., 689 A.2d 531 n. 7 (D.C.1996) (quoting Pioneer Inv. Servs. Co. v. Brunswick Assocs. Ltd. Partnership, 507 U.S. 380, 396 , 113 S.Ct. 1489, 1499 , 123 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993)).

Cosgrove v. United States

411 A.2d 57 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1980

For example: Cardaropoli v. … App.D.C. 325, 97 F.2d 182 (1938) (District of Columbia prisoners may be incarcerated in federal institutions and are subject to federal parole board jurisdiction; and Currey-Bey v.