Case law

ARTHUR G. NEWMYER v. THE SIDWELL FRIENDS SCHOOL and JAMES F. HUNTINGTON

128 A.3d 1023 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 2015

Hedgepeth v. … See Homan v.

Matter of Stanton

532 A.2d 95 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1987

The hearing committee which conducted a hearing on the petition and the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) have recommended that reinstatement be denied. … Bar Ethical Consideration 3-9 (“[I]t is improper for a lawyer to engage in practice where he is not permitted by law or by court order to do so.”); Bowles v.

Omar Cooper v. Starbucks Coffee Corp.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 2017

United States v. … Brown informed him that Starbucks had already decided to fire him. Other than the letter, Mr. Cooper has consistently denied the pushing allegation, including under oath. Washington Times v.

Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 639 v. District of Columbia

631 A.2d 1205 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 1993

Civil Aeronautics Board, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 341, 342 , 147 F.2d 152, 153 (1945). 14 Neither Jackson v. District of Columbia Employees’ Compensation Bd., 537 A.2d 576, 577 (D.C.1988) nor Totz v. … The School Board has not filed a brief on this issue, but relies instead on the PERB’s arguments. 12 . The Union relies heavily on Frain v.

In Re Sneed

673 A.2d 591 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 29, 1996

TERRY, Associate Judge: The Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) has recommended that respondent, a member of our bar, be disbarred under D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1995) on the ground that he was convicted of a … See Wainwright v. Stone, 414 U.S. 21, 22 , 94 S.Ct. 190, 192 , 38 L.Ed.2d 179 (1973); Wiltcher v. United States, 408 A.2d 67, 73 (D.C.1979). 6 . In Texas and New York, Sneed was suspended for eighteen months.

In re Haines and In re Campoamor-Sanchez

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 2025

See Giglio v. … Andrews v. United States, 179 A.3d 279, 287 (D.C. 2018) (quoting Miller v. United States, 14 A.3d 1094, 1115 (D.C. 2011)).

In re Haines and In re Campoamor-Sanchez

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 2025

See Giglio v. … Andrews v. United States, 179 A.3d 279, 287 (D.C. 2018) (quoting Miller v. United States, 14 A.3d 1094, 1115 (D.C. 2011)).

Bisker v. Nationsbank, N.A.

686 A.2d 561 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1996

See, e.g., Bebco Distributors, Inc. v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 485 So.2d 330 (Ala.1986); Board of Trade v. Swiss Credit Bank, 728 F.2d 1241 (9th Cir.1984) (applying California law); Colorado Nat’l Bank v. … Auth., 291 N.W.2d 41 (Iowa 1980); Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Baltimore County, 309 Md. 668 , 526 A.2d 591 (1987); Brown v.

In Re Outlaw

917 A.2d 684 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 2007

Respondent takes exception to the Board’s findings. … In re Mitchell, 727 A.2d 308, 315 (D.C.1999) (quoting Andolsun v. Berlitz Sch. of Languages of Am., Inc., 196 A.2d 926, 927 (D.C.App.1964)).

Clydesdale, Inc. v. Wegener

372 A.2d 1013 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 3, 1977

Ass’n v. Pinkett, D.C.Mun. App., 85 A.2d 58 (1951); Valois, Inc. v. Thorne, D.C.Mun.App., 86 A.2d 530 (1952). … Ass’n v. Pinkett, supra at 61 (Hood, J., dissenting).

In Re Soininen

853 A.2d 712 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 2004

Finally, the Board noted Ms. … Cruz-Foster v. Foster, 597 A.2d 927, 930 (D.C.1991) (citing State v. Krol, 68 N.J. 236 , 344 A.2d 289 , 302 n. 12 (1975)).

In Re Roberson

861 A.2d 1267 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 2004

XI, § 11(d) and directed the Board to recommend whether identical, greater, or lesser discipline should be imposed as reciprocal discipline, or whether the Board should proceed de novo. … Attorney Grievance Commission v. Roberson, 373 Md. 328 , 818 A.2d 1059 (2003). 3 .

In Re Stiller

725 A.2d 533 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 1999

The Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”), in Bar Docket No. 430-88, concluded that Mr. … In January 1994 the Supreme Court issued its decision in Ratzlaf v.

In re Carr-Kennedy

698 A.2d 1021 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 1997

Grievance Counsel moved at that hearing for the admission of a number of documentary exhibits, in State of Indiana v. … Jeanne Kennedy, (Dec. 9, 1994 charge of operating under the influence of alcohol); People of State of Michigan v.

In Re Mba-Jonas

993 A.2d 1071 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 2010

Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Mba-Jo-nas (“Mba-Jonas II”), 402 Md. 334 , 936 A.2d 839, 847 (2007). … See Attorney Grievance Comm’n v.

In Re Thomas-Pinkney

840 A.2d 700 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 2004

by the Board. … Obviously, a division of this court is required to follow the opinion of the court in Addams , rather than a concurrence or a dissent, M.A.P. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310, 312 (D.C.1971), and Ms.

Board of Trustees, The Grand Lodge of the Independent Order of Odd Fellow of the District of Columbia v. Carmine's DC, LLC

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 2020

N.A. v. … Zere v.

Shaw Project Area Committee, Inc. v. District of Columbia Commission on Human Rights

500 A.2d 251 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 1985

Burdine, 450 U.S. at 254 , 101 S.Ct. at 1094 ; Board of Trustees v. … Spevak v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 407 A.2d 549 , 553 n. 6 (D.C.1979).

Arnold v. United States

467 A.2d 136 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1983

Brown v. … United States v. Johnson, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 54 , 433 F.2d 1160 (1970); Evans v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 122 , 232 F.2d 379 (1956). However, because Johnson and Evans have been effectively overruled by Brown v.

In Re Mitchell

727 A.2d 308 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1999

Reback, supra, 487 A.2d at 239 (quoting Andolsun v. Berlitz Schools of Languages of America, Inc., 196 A.2d 926, 927 (D.C.1964)). … Begier v. IRS, 496 U.S. 53, 59 , 110 S.Ct. 2258 , 110 L.Ed.2d 46 (1990).