Case law

Austin v. United States

64 A.3d 413 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 2013

Brown v. United States, 726 A.2d 149, 153 (D.C.1999) (citations omitted). … Pierre-Louis was not certified in forensic pathology by the American Board of Pathology.

Johnson v. Johnson

179 A.2d 720 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 1962

Lutz v. Lutz, D.C.Mun.App., 166 A.2d 489 . 2 . Schreiber v. Schreiber, D.C.Mun.App., 139 A.2d 278 . 3 .Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309 , 122 P.2d 219 .

In Re Holdmann

834 A.2d 887 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 2003

The Board did not recommend that Holdmann be required to pay costs. Holdmann then excepted to the Board’s recommendation, and the case is now before us. II. … United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 732-37 , 113 S.Ct. 1770 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993); Baxter v. United States, 640 A.2d 714, 717 (D.C.1994). 4 .

Matter of Smith

403 A.2d 296 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1979

In Mendicino v. … Bouie v. City of Columbia, supra at 355, 84 S.Ct. 1697 .

Shelton v. United States

388 A.2d 859 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 1978

He stated that at the time of the robbery he was with his girlfriend, Vera Brown, celebrating her birthday. Ms. … v.

Jones v. Pennsylvania Railroad

19 D.C. 178 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1890

Brown, 17 Wall., 445 . … Brown, 17 Wallace,. 445, appears to sanction this.

West End Citizens Ass'n v. D.C. Zoning Commission

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 2024

Wheatley v. D.C. Zoning Comm’n, 229 A.3d 754, 758 (D.C. 2020). This court reverses the Commission’s 3 Pursuant to D.C. Code § 6-641.07, “all meetings of the Board shall be open to the public. … Ass’n v. D.C. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 605 A.2d 22, 38 (D.C. 1992) (citing Lamont v. Rogers, 479 A.2d 1274, 1278 (D.C. 1984)); see Price v. D.C.

Ronda L. Nunnally v. DC Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Bd.

184 A.3d 855 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 17, 2018

See Nunnally v. … Nunnally also relies on Pierce v. District of Columbia Police and Firefighters’ Retirement & Relief Board, 882 A.2d 199 (D.C. 2005).

Blades v. United States

25 A.3d 39 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 2011

Cunningham, 974 A.2d at 245 (quoting (Rocky) Brown v. United States, 683 A.2d 118 , 124 *43 (D.C.1996)). … (Rocky) Brown v. United States, 683 A.2d 118, 127 (D.C.1996). 5 .

Darden v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

911 A.2d 410 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 2006

The Board had authority to reverse the ALJ’s order only if it was unsupported by substantial evidence or was legally incorrect. See Gary v. … Frank v.

Standard Nut Margarine Co. v. Mellon

1 D.C. 9 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1934

In Brown v. Rudolph, 58 App. W. C. 116, it was held that the Commissioners of the District were not responsible in damages for their actions in instituting proceedings to have plaintiff declared insane. Yaselli v. … From certain of his decisions an appeal lies to the Board of Tax Appeals, and from that Board to the Circuit Courts of Appeals of the United States.

In Re Vivian N. Brown, Rosenau LLP

211 A.3d 165 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 2019

Brown’s assets in the amount of $25,358.18. … See Vining v.

Gardner v. United States

898 A.2d 367 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 4, 2006

Over Gardner's objection, the trial court provided the jury with a transcript of Brown's in-court testimony and a copy of Brown’s pretrial statement, a document which had *372 been admitted into evidence during trial. … During Brown's testimony, counsel for Gardner had used the pretrial statement to impeach Brown; however, on redirect, the government used a different portion of the same statement to rehabilitate her.

Anderson, Sr. v. D.C. Dep't of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 2023

Anderson’s claims as untimely, and the Compensation Review Board (CRB) affirmed. Mr. … v.

Jenkins v. United States

541 A.2d 1269 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 4, 1988

United States, 283 U.S. 308 , *1273 310, 51 S.Ct. 470, 471 , 75 L.Ed. 1054 (1931)); Robinson, 154 U.S.App.D.C. at 269 , 475 F.2d at 380 ; Brown v. … The government relies on interpretations of Brown v.

Ebron v. United States

838 A.2d 1140 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 2003

See Tindle v. United States, 778 A.2d 1077, 1082 (D.C.2001); Brown v. United States, 683 A.2d 118 , 126 n. 9 (D.C.1996). … Brown received approximately $77,000.

Johnson v. Hobson

505 A.2d 1313 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 1986

See, e.g., Makeever v. … See, e.g., Pepe v.

Gerald G. Neill, Jr. v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board and Fraternal Order of Police, Metropolitan Police Department Labor Committee

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 19, 2014

Brown v. District of Columbia Pub. Emp. … the Board such order of enforcement [upon petition by an aggrieved party] as in the case of a request by the Board under subsection (b). . . .”). 20 Reply Brief at 4 (quoting Summers v.

Berry v. Kinlein

219 A.2d 850 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1966

Accord, Corbett v. Kinlein, D.C.App., 191 A.2d 246 (1963). Affirmed. . Code 1961, § 2-421 et seq. . Code 1961, § 2-429. .

Anderson, Sr. v. D.C. Dep't of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 2023

Anderson’s claims as untimely, and the Compensation Review Board (CRB) affirmed. Mr. … v.