Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
119 results
0.48s
18 F. Cas. 692 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1802
Cited 2 timesPublished22 F. Cas. 315 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Oct 15, 1837
Brown could not aban *316 don after underletting a part of the premises for the year.
Cited 1 timesPublished13 F. Cas. 734 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · May 15, 1832
The case of Eden v. … See also 2 Saund. 307; Ludwell v. Hole, 1 Strange, 696; Davis v. Millet, 2 Ib. 1196; Starkie on Slander, 292, 293, 302; Alliston v. Moore, Hetley, 167; Carn v. Osgood, 1 Lev. 280; Aston v. Blagrove, Ld.
Cited 11 timesPublished4 F. Cas. 377 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1828
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text4 F. Cas. 438 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Apr 15, 1822
Cited 1 timesPublished1 F. Cas. 1091 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1830
Brown, as the purchaser. … Brown as the purchaser and he had complied with the terms of sale. The plaintiff, by the assignment from Mr.
Cited 1 timesPublished23 F. Cas. 1276 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Aug 28, 1843
Cited 0 timesPublished7 F. Cas. 29 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Jul 15, 1805
Cited 0 timesPublished4 F. Cas. 435 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Apr 15, 1802
Cited 0 timesPublished2 D.C. 314 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · May 15, 1822
The demand, upon the acceptor, who resided in Alexandria, was made on Saturday, the 16th, and notice was given by mail of the 18th to the defendant, Brown, who resided in Washington.
Cited 0 timesPublished6 F. Cas. 542 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · May 15, 1827
Brown is not evidence against his co-defendant Mr. … Gunnis et al. v. Erhart, 1 H. Bl. 289. The fact, therefore, must be considered as established, that Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublished12 F. Cas. 309 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1802
Cited 0 timesPublished18 F. Cas. 694 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1802
Cited 0 timesPublished10 F. Cas. 1067 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1824
Brown, and he believes this to be the one which is filed in this cause. … See Chitty, 35, 47, 180; Cromwell v. Hinson, 2 Esp. Rep. 512; 5 Ib. 175; Chitty, 236, note; Id. 409.
Cited 0 timesPublished6 F. Cas. 544 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Nov 15, 1839
Cited 0 timesPublished4 F. Cas. 425 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Oct 15, 1821
Cited 0 timesPublished13 F. Cas. 115 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · May 15, 1822
The demand, upon the acceptor, who resided in Alexandria. was made on Saturday, the 16th, and notice was given by mail of the 18th to the defendant, Brown, who resided in Washington.
Cited 0 timesPublished11 F. Cas. 422 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Apr 15, 1810
Cited 0 timesPublished4 F. Cas. 426 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Apr 7, 1843
The attorney for the corporation, said that this very point was decided in the case of Nichols v. … Brown was in the employment of Hon. Daniel Webster, then a senator of congress, at the time of the arrest, the act has no application to him, and affords no justification to the officer making the arrest.
Cited 0 timesPublished24 F. Cas. 1247 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1835
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna