Case law

Varian Associates v. United States

56 C.C.P.A. 54 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 6, 1969

Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Aragon, 329 U.S. 143 (1946); United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc., 344 U.S. 33 (1952). … In re Von Clemm, 43 CCPA 56, CAD 609 (1955); Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 (1951); Securities and Exchange Commission v. New England Electric System, 390 U.S. 207, 211 (1968).

United States v. Charles R. Allen, Inc.

184 F.2d 846 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 9, 1950

Wilkens & Co. v.' … Grace & Co. v.

California Packing Corporation v. Tillman & Bendel

40 F.2d 108 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 14, 1930

Co. v. California Cedar Products Co., 56 App. D. C. 156, 11 F.(2d) 205 , pumps and wall board were held to be goods of the same descriptive properties, since the court concluded that confusion would result. … Co. v. California Cedar Products Co., 56 App. D. C. 156, 11 F. (2d) 205, pumps and wall board were held to be goods of the same descriptive properties, since the court concluded that confusion would result.

White v. Syvertsen

46 F.2d 364 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 3, 1931

Co. v. Pneumatic Scale Corp., 166 F. 288 . … See also Rolfe v. Hoffman, 26 App. D. C. 336.

P. Silverman & Son v. United States

27 C.C.P.A. 324 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 4, 1940

See Cia Algodonera v. United States, 23 C. C. P. A. 42, T. D. 47686, and cases therein cited. … In Downing Co. v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 391 , T.

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. v. United States

19 C.C.P.A. 415 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 30, 1932

Larsen proceeded to the Ross Sea and captured whales, from which were produced on board her 12,833K tons of oil. … Markell v. United States, 16 Ct. Cust. Appls. 518 , T. D. 43239; United States v. Oregon, etc., 164 U. S. 526, 539 ; Hawaii v. Mankichi, 190 U. S. 197, 213 ; United States v. Katz, 271 U.

Quong Yuen Shing Co. v. United States

31 C.C.P.A. 43 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 10, 1943

Ueland, Quong Yuen Shing & Co. v. United States, supra. … United States v. Goldenberg, 168 U. S. 95 .

Kobe Import Co. v. United States

42 C.C.P.A. 194 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 25, 1955

United States v. Manahan Chemical Co., Inc., 24 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 53, T. D. 48333; Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al. v. United States, 31 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 36, C. A. D. 246; H. S. Dorf & Co., Inc., et al. v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co., 306 U. S. 292 .

Gallagher v. United States

21 C.C.P.A. 313 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 23, 1933

Appellant, citing the cases of Stubbs v. United States, 7 Ct. Cust. Appls. 399 , T.D. 36967; Peabody v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 354 , T.D. 40491, and United States v. Tampa Box Co., 15 Ct. Cust. … The Stubbs case, supra, is not regarded as being, in any wise, controlling here, and the same is true of McKesson & Robbins v. United States, 11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 459 , T.D. 39534, and of Lawrence Groom & Co. v.

United States v. Davis

20 C.C.P.A. 305 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 5, 1932

An examination of the briefs in United States v. … We think this conclusion is supported in principle by the cases of Converse v. Burgess, 18 How. 413 ; Stein v. United States, 1 Ct. Cust. Appls. 36 , T. D. 31007; and Loeb v. United States, supra.

Yardley & Co. v. United States

22 C.C.P.A. 390 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 5, 1934

United States v. Kronfeld, Saunders, Inc., 20 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 57, T. D. 45679; Altman & Co. v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 315 , T. D. 41232. … The case of Park & Tilford v. United States, 1 Ct. Cust. Appls. 34 , T.

Coleco Industries, Inc. v. International Trade Commission

573 F.2d 1247 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 6, 1978

Co. v. … Brown Co., 473 F. 2d 849, 850-51 , 177 177 USPQ 130, 131 (CA 61973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 824 , 179 USPQ 321 , the court stated: In determining whether a patent has been infringed by an accused device, two tests must be

United States v. Massce

20 C.C.P.A. 210 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 31, 1932

D. 37995; Lietz Co. v. United States, 11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 426 , T. D. 39434; and Thomas Co. v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 425 , T. D. 40591. … In United States v. Bliss & Co. et al., 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 433 , T.

United States v. Wirth

24 C.C.P.A. 188 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 2, 1936

I to V for the years from 1926 to 1932, vary slightly. … Brown & Co., 4 Ct. Cust. Appls. 102 , T.

United States v. Albrecht

27 C.C.P.A. 112 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 30, 1939

Papers and paper board and pulpboard, including cardboard and leatherboard or compress leather, embossed, cut, die-cut, or stamped into designs or shapes, such as initials, monograms, lace, borders, bands, strips, or other … United States v. Swift & Co., 14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 222 , T. D. 41706; United States v. F. W. Myers & Co., Inc., 24 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 464, T. D. 48913.

General Baking Co. v. Commander-Larabee Corp.

82 F.2d 427 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 23, 1936

Frazier, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the General Baking Company. … . & Company v.

Massce v. United States

18 C.C.P.A. 243 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 10, 1930

The Customs Court, after holding, upon the authority of United States v. Hamburger Levine Co., 5 Ct. Cust. Appls. 217 , T. … The Government cites us to Kotzin v. United States, 14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 99 , T. D. 41589.

United States v. Freitag & Sons, Inc.

21 C.C.P.A. 500 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 26, 1934

United States v. Union Pacific Railroad, 91 U.S. 72, 79 ; Holy Trinity Church v. United States, 143 U.S. 457, 463 ; United States v. Bacharach Industrial Instrument Co., 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 262, 264 , T.D. 41203. … Robbins v. Robertson, 33 Fed. 709 .

United States v. Fred Frankel & Sons

52 C.C.P.A. 81 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 6, 1965

See, United States v. Wanamaker, 14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 285 , T.D. 41888. … Some reliance has been placed on our decision in United States v. S. H. Kress <& Co., 46 CCPA 135, C.A.D. 716. We have considered it but do not find it pertinent. The jewelry provision was not involved. United States v.

Atkins, Kroll & Co. v. United States

50 C.C.P.A. 62 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 25, 1963

Nor instance, appellant relies very heavily upon United States v. Benneche, 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 92 , which involved stalks of boxwood to *66 be used for umbrella handles. … Another case brought to our attention by appellant is United States v. Larzelere & Co., 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 273 .