Case law

United States v. Edward M. Poons Co. of Kobe

18 C.C.P.A. 283 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 1, 1930

Smith v. United States, 1 Ct. Cust. Appls. 489 , T. … Vide Stern et al v. United States, 77 Fed. 607 ; Wetstein v. United States, G. A. 6200, T. D. 26848, 10 Treas. Dec. 531 (1905); Downing & Co. v. United States, G. A. 6408, T. D. 27538, 12 Treas.

Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United States

42 C.C.P.A. 86 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 9, 1954

In August of 1946, after part of the second four-color edition had been exported to Great Britain, the British Board of Trade cancelled the import license. … Proctor Company v. United States, 40 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 33, C. A. D. 494.

United States v. Rice & Fielding, Inc.

13 Ct. Cust. 149 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 15, 1925

The Board of General Appraisers sustained the protest and the Government has appealed from the judgment entered below. … See also Wilson et al. v. Spalding, 19 Fed. 304 .

Cohn v. United States

25 C.C.P.A. 220 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 22, 1937

Judge Brown dissented, and was of opinion that the protest should be sustained under paragraph 1115 (a). Judgment was accordingly entered overruling the protest and the importer has appealed. … United States v. Macy & Co., 7 Ct. Cust. Appls. 8 , T.

United States v. Simon Saw & Steel Co.

51 C.C.P.A. 33 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 23, 1964

See, e.g., Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304 (1893); United States v. … And in Fink v.

David L. Moss Co. v. United States

103 F.2d 395 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 27, 1939

Prior to the enactment of the Tariff Act of' 1922, decisions of the Board of General Appraisers (now United States Customs Court) as to the foreign-market value of imported merchandise were by legislation made final and conclusive … United States v. Klingenberg, 153 U.S. 93 , 14 S.Ct. 790 , 38 L.Ed. 647 ; Monongahela Bridge v. United States, supra.

United States v. Hudson Forwarding & Shipping Co.

18 C.C.P.A. 258 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 10, 1930

Both are in imitation of lizard skin, one being green in color and the other brown. With reference to the composition of the coating or covering on the surface of the cloth, Mr. … (Inc.) v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 553 , T. D. 41432. Did appellee, upon the trial, make a prima facie case controverting the finding of the collector? Mr.

MacLaren v. Stoetzel

38 F.2d 125 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 21, 1930

The Mason v. … The present case seems to come clearly within the holding of this court in Esty v. Newton, 14 App. D. C. 50, and it was so held by the Board of Examiners in Chief and the Commissioner of Patents.

Lamont v. United States

16 Ct. Cust. 488 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 29, 1929

La Manna, Azema & Farnan v. … Smillie & Co. v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 365 , T.

McQuillan v. United States

18 C.C.P.A. 215 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 10, 1930

In the case of United States v. Wyman & Co., 4 Ct. Cust. Appls. 264 , T. … United State v. Foard, T. D. 30936; United States v. The Swedish Produce Co., 4 Ct. Cust. Appls. 223 , T. D. 33437. The issue here is controlled by the decision in the Wyman & Co. case, supra.

Elder Mfg. Co. v. International Shoe Co.

194 F.2d 114 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 29, 1952

One was a member of the board of directors and was in charge of sales; the other was a salesman during the entire period of time in question. … Also worthy of note are the cases of Auerbach & Sons v. Hall, Hayward Co., 1904 C.D. 271, 11 O.G. 806 and the Gem Cutlery Co. v.

Wroblewski v. United States

28 C.C.P.A. 150 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 24, 1940

D. 40315; affd., United States v. Fish, 268 U. S. 607 ; Lee & Co. v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 269 , T. D. 41205; Linen Thread Co. v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 301 , T. … (Inc.) v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 387 , T. D. 41320; Syndicate Trading Co. v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 409 , T. D. 41339; United States v. Bracher & Co. et al., 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 432 , T.

T. D. Downing & Co. v. United States

16 Ct. Cust. 293 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 12, 1928

The importer appealed to reappraisement by a single general appraiser, and for a review by the Board of General Appraisers in both instances, the appraised value being .in each instance affirmed. … Johnson Co. v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 373 , T. D. 41318; Unitid States v. Tadross, 14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 10 , T. D. 41528; United States v. Tower & Sons, 15 Ct. Cust. Appls. 83 , T. D. 42158; Downing & Co. v.

Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. United States

27 C.C.P.A. 17 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 1, 1939

Foster & Co. v. United States, T. D. 47922, 68 Treas. … We cannot agree with the board that the words “whether their contents be dutiable or free” distinguishes the Ross case from the case under consideration.

E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States

490 F.2d 967 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 7, 1974

¡See United States v. … Witness Thompson, on direct examina tion, testified that he grew up on a dairy farm, had operated his own dairy farm since 1944, was chairman of the board of the Eastern Artificial Insemination Cooperative, and traveled widely

United States v. Champion Coated Paper Co.

22 C.C.P.A. 414 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 3, 1934

See North American Mercantile Co. v. United States, 18 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 74, T. D. 44030, and *421 Pacific Trading Co. v. United States, 19 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 361, T. D. 45508. … In the case of Pacific Trading Co. v.

United States v. Manahan Chemical Co.

24 C.C.P.A. 53 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 4, 1936

The opinion cites, as illustrations of the latter character of cases, United States v. Porto Rico Coal Co., 17 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 288, T. D. 43716, and United States v. V. W. Davis, etc., 20 C. C. P. A. … As in the case of United States v.

United States v. Charles R. Allen, Inc.

37 C.C.P.A. 110 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 2, 1950

Wilkens & Co. v. United States, T. D. 15417, G. … United States v. Sehlbach (CCA — 2d) 90 Fed. 798 ; Pickhardt v. Merritt, 132 U. S. 252 ; Newman v. Arthur, 109 U. S. 132 .

Thornley v. United States

18 C.C.P.A. 265 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 10, 1930

.” *266 Both boats were brought to this country on board of steamers. The boats were carried on deck and the spars, sails, and other equipment, packed in cases, were carried in the hold. … In the case of Hitner Sons Co. v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 216 , T. D. 41175, the definition of the word “vessels” as used in said section 3 of the Revised Statutes was before this court.

United States v. Warne

18 C.C.P.A. 380 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 28, 1931

Appellee’s counsel cites in support of this contention the case of MacMillan Co. v. United States, T. D. 43422, 55 Treas. … The book is plainly designed for the use of very young children. *387 Exhibit 15 is a book containing Browning’s “The Pied Piper of Hamlin,” profusely illustrated with full pages in color.