Case law

Langendorf United Bakeries, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.

125 F.2d 159 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 2, 1942

Such specimen contains in addition to the mark certain printed matter, including the statement that “This delicious nut brown cereal is made chiefly of wheat products * * Appellee filed its notice of opposition, alleging … In our opinion in the case of Steinreich v. The Coca Cola Co., 21 C. C. P. A.

United States v. Import Toy & Specialties Co.

13 Ct. Cust. 230 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 4, 1925

In the case of United States v. Kelley Hardware Co., 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 204 , T. … In the case of Cruger’s (Inc.) v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. Appls 516, T.

Clinton Smullyan Associates v. United States

35 C.C.P.A. 7 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 20, 1947

Bernstein v. United States, 18 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 193, T. D. 44379; Basser’s Silk Co. v. United States, 23 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 141, T. D. 48008; Nippon Dry Goods Co. v. United States, 27 C. C. P. A. … As early as 1908, in the case of Fritzsche Brothers v. United States, T. D. 29359, 16 Treas.

Farmer v. Pritchard

65 F.2d 165 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 29, 1933

Fowler v. Dodge, 14 App. D. C. 477; Steele v. Chubb, 58 App. D. C. 26, 24 F. (2d) 468; Gleason v. Dosch, 17 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1012, 39 F. (2d) 687; Dorer v. Moody, 18 C. C. P. A. … We are satisfied that the decision of the Board of Appeals is correct, and it should be, and is, affirmed.

Austin v. United States

21 C.C.P.A. 211 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 6, 1933

The majority of the court below, Brown, Judge, dissenting, was of the opinion that the importer had not made a case justifying remission. … Wolf & Co. v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 589 , T.D. 41453. It may be that he has done so. This record, however, in our opinion, is not sufficient to justify a reversal of the court below on a question of fact.

L. Tobert Co. v. United States

41 C.C.P.A. 161 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 2, 1953

According to a statement of this court in the case of United States v. Block & Co., 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 5, 6 , T. D. 40847, 47 Treas. … In the Bloch & Co. case, supra, this court approved the decision of the Board of United States General Appraisers (now the United States Customs Court) sustaining the importer’s protest.

Mitsui & Co. v. States

12 Ct. Cust. 1 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 17, 1923

—United States v. Kuttroff ( 9 Ct. Cust. Appls. 239 ; T. D. 38204). … That rule was expressed by this court in United States v.

Perry v. United States

6 Ct. Cust. 201 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 18, 1915

The method of their construction is aptly described by the board as follows: The glass is first cut into the desired shapes and forms. … That provision of that law was the subject of decision by the Supreme Court in United States v. Perry ( 146 U. S., 71 ).

Judkins v. United States

6 Ct. Cust. 112 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 3, 1915

The Board of General Appraisers overruled the protest and the importers appealed. … United States v. Stouffer ( 3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 67, 69 ; T. D. 32351).

Lionel Trading Co. v. United States

24 C.C.P.A. 432 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 22, 1937

. *434 In addition to portions of the record in Lionel Trading Co., Inc. v. United States, 21 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 362, T. … United States v. Henry Maier, 21 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 41, T. D. 46378.

United States v. Fung Chong Co.

34 C.C.P.A. 40 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 9, 1946

Akeroyd & Co. et al. v. United States, supra; Acker v. United States, 1 Ct. Cust. Appls. 328 , T. D. 31431; Lamont, Corliss & Co. et al. v. United States, 16 Ct. Cust. Appls. 488 , T. D. 43224; United States v. … Akeroyd & Co. et al. v.

United States v. Monroe-Goldkamp Co.

15 Ct. Cust. 26 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 4, 1927

In the case of United States v. … The judgment of the Board of United States General Appraisers (now United States Customs Court) sustaining the protest is affirmed.

The United States (Ralph Valls, Party-In-Interest) v. Hammond Lead Products, Inc.

440 F.2d 1024 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 22, 1971

These statutory terms were defined in Bradford Co. v. … United States, 249 U.S. 34 , 39 S.Ct. 218 , 63 L.Ed. 461 (1919), aff’g 7 Ct.Cust.Appls. 97, T.D. 36426 (1916), and Downs v.

United States v. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc.

22 C.C.P.A. 281 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 29, 1934

It is apparent, however, from the opinion of Judge Sullivan, the concurring opinion of Judge Brown, and the dissenting opinion of Judge McClelland that each member of the court considered the case upon the theory that the … See United States v. Kronfeld, Saunders, Inc., 20 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 57, T. D. 45679, and cases cited therein. For the reasons stated, the judgment is affirmed.

Surgical Supply Importing Co. v. United States

3 Ct. Cust. 429 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 27, 1912

It seems unnecessary to say more in the disposition of this case than that it is ruled by Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. United States ( 2 Ct. Cust. Appls., 329 ; T. D. 32055) and Khauth, Nachod & Kuhne ( 3 Ct. Cust. … Upon the authority of these two cases the judgment of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.

McLaughlin v. United States

17 C.C.P.A. 302 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 25, 1929

The Customs Court, Justice Brown dissenting, overruled the protests, and importer has appealed. … United States v. Silk Association, 16 Ct. Cust. Appls. 566 , T. D. 43296.

In Re General Petroleum Corporation of California

49 F.2d 966 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 27, 1931

A.) 142 F. 727, 729 ; Newcomer & Lewis v. Scriven Co. (C. C. A.) 168 F. 621 ; Taylor v. Bostick (C. C. A.) 299 F. 232 ; Coca-Cola Co. v. Williamsburgh Stopper Co. et al. and Coca-Cola Co. v. Whittemann et al., 2 T. M. … The appellee therein began the use of a material which had a color referred to as “a russet or reddjsh brown.” Appellant therein began to iise a material having the *969 same color.

Barton Manufacturing Co. v. Hercules Powder Co.

88 F.2d 708 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 22, 1937

The trade-mark has been and is applied to various kinds of shoe polish, the colors being black, nut brown, cordovan, oxblood, neutral, light tan, black suede cleaner, white canvas cleaner, white kid cleaner, and to another … In the Rose Nerenstone Bookman, etc., v.

York Feather & Down Corp. v. United States

40 C.C.P.A. 51 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 4, 1952

Rosenbaum Grain Corp. v. United States, 72 Treas. Dec. 428 , T. D. 49205. See also Shallus v. United States, 1 Ct. Cust. Appls. 316 , T. D. 31408; United States v. Baker Castor Oil Co., 2 Ct. Cust. … We have carefully examined the authorities and arguments cited by appellant, including the case of United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc., 34 C. C. P. A (Customs) 112, C. A.

United States v. Proctor Co

5 Ct. Cust. 44 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 14, 1914

Again, in United States v. Wyman ( 4 Ct. Cust. Appls., 264 ; T. … The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed.