Case law

Derek Norman Stevens v. Hermann Schmid and Emil Kirbach

406 F.2d 776 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 13, 1969

Accordingly the decision of the board is affirmed. Affirmed. 1 . … Krohm v. Oishei, 373 F.2d 992 , 54 CCPA 1260; Binstead v. Littmann, 242 F.2d 766 , 44 CCPA 839. 4 .

Fenton Co. v. United States

14 Ct. Cust. 277 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 19, 1926

The Board of General Appraisers (now United States Customs Court), sustained the action of the collector and appellants have appealed to this court. … The case of United States v. Cronkhite Co., 9 Ct. Cust. Appls. 129 , which was cited, is not in point.

Application of Greider

186 F.2d 718 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 16, 1951

The majority, however, have affirmed the decision of the Board of Appeals with respect to the rejection of that claim. … Reed v. Allen, 286 U.S. 191, 207 , 52 S.Ct. 532 , 76 L.Ed. 1054 .

United States v. Bosca, Reed, MacKinnon Co.

24 C.C.P.A. 364 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 25, 1937

J., concluded that the record in the case of United States v. … The rule involved in the case of United States v.

Mershon v. Robinson

121 F.2d 495 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 30, 1941

V. A. if operated in an electrolyte containing aluminum hydroxide. The electrolyte for this condenser was treated by the procedure of “Special Test 139.” … The decision of the board is affirmed.

Application of John S. Metcalf, Charles E. Miller and Roy C. Olney

394 F.2d 558 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 2, 1968

Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 , 86 S.Ct. 684 , 15 L.Ed.2d 546 , (1966); In re Lindell, 385 F.2d 453 , 55 CCPA - (1967); In re Weber, 341 F.2d 143 , 52 CCPA 1015 (1965). … Accordingly, the decision of the board is affirmed. Affirmed. 1 . The board consisted of Messrs. Federico and Rosa, Examiners-in-Chief, and Stone, Acting Examiner-in-Chief. Mr. Stone wrote the opinion of the board. 2 .

Application of Walter E. Donaldson, Deceased, by Elsie Donaldson, Legal Representative, and Beverley H. Van Horne

436 F.2d 1052 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 11, 1971

The graph charts the P-V relationship while pressurizing and depressurizing the cylinder up to and from that maximum pressure. … The decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed. 1 .

Application of Hyland C. Flint

411 F.2d 1353 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 3, 1969

Gayler et al. v. Wilder, 10 U.S. … F.C.C. v.

United States v. Geo. S. Bush & Co.

26 C.C.P.A. 145 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 31, 1938

See also Mamluck & Co., et al. v. United States ( 6 Ct. Cust. Appls. 566 , 561; T. D. 36198). The rule to .the same effect was announced by the Supreme Court. In the case of Chew Hing Lung v. Wise ( 176 U. … The use of wire such as that here involved is shown to be confined to mailing pulp (that is, it is used in dehydrating or drying the wet mass of ground material), coarse fiber board and building board.

Beatrice Foods Co. v. The Borden Company, Beatrice Foods Co. v. Paul F. Beich Company

435 F.2d 1335 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 21, 1971

Beich’s oppositions were sustained on essentially the same grounds, the board noting that Beich’s goods and appellant’s were identical. … Appellant contends in its brief that similarity in terminal portions of trademarks is not alone a sufficient basis for a finding of likelihood of confusion, citing cases such as Younghusband v.

The United States v. Soderhamn MacHine Manufacturing Company

417 F.2d 783 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Aug 14, 1969

United States v. C. S. Emery & Co., 53 CCPA 1, 8 [2], C.A.D. 868 (1966). … National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian E. & S. Co., 306 U.S. 292, 300 , 59 S.Ct. 501 , 83 L.Ed. 660, 665 (1939), citing Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v.

Cassela Color Co. v. United States

6 Ct. Cust. 405 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 3, 1915

This court, following the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. Nichols ( 186 U. … The decision of the board sustaining the collector’s assessment is affirmed.

Murray Hauptschein, Milton Braid and Francis E. Lawlor v. Donald Irwin McCane and Ivan Maxwell Robinson

339 F.2d 460 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 17, 1964

Thus, we must determine whether one skilled in the art would be able to practice the invention defined by the counts with the disclosure of the McCane et al. parent application at hand, Swain v. … We have reviewed the record in the light of appellants’ contentions, but we find no reversible error in the decision of the board. The decision of the board is affirmed. Affirmed. 1 .

United States v. Macksoud Importing Co.

25 C.C.P.A. 44 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 29, 1937

It was by virtue •of the provisions of the Tariff Act of 1922 that this court, in the case of United States v. Macy & Co., 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 245 , T. … D. 41199, for the first time judicially declared as follows: * * * With the enlarged powers which have been conferred upon the board and its members by Congress, we can not doubt that the board is a court of the United States

United States v. Heraeus-Amersil, Inc.

671 F.2d 1356 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 18, 1982

Compare V. W. Davis v. United States, T.D. 49012 (Cust. Ct. 1937), and cases cited therein, with Central Commodities Corp. v. United States, 6 Cust. Ct. 452 454 ,, C.D. 514 (1941) and Department of the Army v. … Trading, 66 CCPA 11, 23n. 31, C.A.D. 1215, 586 F. 2d 221 , 232 n. 31 (1978) and Kloris, Ltd. v. United States, 56 Cust Ct. 365, 368, C.D. 2660 (1966) with A. W. Fenton Co. v.

Morimura Bros. v. United States

7 Ct. Cust. 378 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 16, 1917

The Board of General Appraisers overruled all the protests and the Importers appealed. By reason of our decision in Morimura v. United States ( 6 Ct. Cust. Appls., 183 ; T. … The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.

Knutson v. Ellson

121 F.2d 517 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 2, 1941

Fageol v. Midboe, 19 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1117, 56 F. (2d) 867; Hurd v. Smith, 25 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1137, 97 F. (2d) 147; Preston et al v. White, 25 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1219, 97 F. (2d) 160 ; Petersen v. … Beidler v. Caps et al., 17 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 703, 36 F. (2d) 122; Jones v. Evans, 18 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 866, 46 F. (2d) 197. Appellee is an educated man and apparently a competent mining engineer.

American Security Bank v. American Security & Trust Co.

571 F.2d 564 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 2, 1978

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), 190 USPQ 271 (1976), dismissing an opposition to the registration of AMERICAN SECURITY BANK on application serial … cited the following decisions: Vacuum-Electronics Corp. v.

M. K. M. Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Damon Creations, Inc.

357 F.2d 997 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 9, 1966

KNITTING MILLS, INC., Appellant, v. DAMON CREATIONS, INC., Appellee. Patent Appeal No. 7638. United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. April 7, 1966. Rehearing Denied June 9, 1966. 1 Oliver C. … Therefore we conclude, contrary to the board, that the marks are not reasonably susceptible to similar pronunciation. 12 We also are constrained to disagree with the board that the marks look alike.

Murray v. Bailey

112 F.2d 1015 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 1, 1940

See Murphy v. Thompson, 46 App. D. C. 515; Wells et al. v. Honigmann, 50 App. D. C. 99, 267 Fed. 743 . … The decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed.