Case law

Lester C. Crome v. Henton Morrogh

239 F.2d 390 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 30, 1956

Giambalvo v. Detrick, 168 F.2d 116 , 35 C.C.P.A., Patents, 1112. … However, as was pointed out in Brand v.

Eger v. Watson

104 F.2d 953 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 26, 1939

Sweetland v. Don Cole, 19 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 751, 53 F. (2d) 709; Garrett G. Mudd v. Otto A. Schoen, 19 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 840, 54 F. (2d) 959; Atherton v. Payne, 19 C. C. P. A. … In re Key, supra; Bryson v. Clarke, supra.

Application of Gastown, Inc

326 F.2d 780 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 23, 1964

In Pure Oil Co. v. … [Emphasis ours.] ■ ,, See also Martino v. Michigan Window Cleaning Co., 327 U.S. 173 , 66 S.Ct. 379 , 90 L.Ed. 603 ; Steele et al. v.

In re Boileau

163 F.2d 562 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 17, 1947

Boileau v. Godfrey, 31 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 723, 138 F. (2d) 67, 59 USPQ 149 . … His action in so doing was affirmed by the Board of Appeals and appellant has brought this appeal to review that decision of the board.

United States v. Farbenfabriken of Elberfeld Co.

3 Ct. Cust. 358 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Oct 28, 1912

A rehearing was granted by the board and additional testimony was offered by the importer. Thereupon the board reversed its former finding and sustained the protest. … It was said by the Supreme Court in Newman v. Arthur ( 109 U.

Application of Craige

189 F.2d 620 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 26, 1951

See Kropa v. Robie et al., 187 F.2d 150 , 38 C.C.P.A., Patents, -. … The Primary Examiner and the board were of the opinion that the claimed compositions were analogous and invoked the rule of the Saunders case, supra.

In re Ferguson

83 F.2d 693 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 1, 1936

However, in the decision HeiObrmh et al. v. McKesson, 1924 C. … We think they are clearly to be condemned under the rule stated in O’Reilly v. Morse, 15 How. 62, 112 , 14 L. Ed. 601 ; Risdon v. Medart, 158 U. S. 68, 77 , 15 Sup. Ct. 745, 39 L.

Veolay, Inc. v. United States

21 C.C.P.A. 268 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 28, 1933

Every such application shall be assigned by the Board of General Appraisers to a board of three general appraisers, who shall consider the case upon the samples of the merchandise, if there be any, and the record made before … The Antelope, 10 Wheat. 66, 125 ; Etting v. United States Bank, 11 Wheat. 57, 76 ; Brown v. Aspden et al., 14 How. 25 ; Durant v. Essex Co., 7 Wall. 107 . This rule is one of necessity.

In re Blondel

499 F.2d 1311 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 27, 1974

The board said Yale I states that longer lasting activity is produced where longer chain carboxylic acyl esterifying groups are introduced. … Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 , 86 S.Ct. 684 , 15 L.Ed.2d 545 (1966); In re Papesch, 315 F.2d 381 , 50 CCPA 1084 (1963).

In Re Mann

47 F.2d 370 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 25, 1931

The Board of Appeals held that the claims were anticipated by the Koppelman and Cooper reference, and apparently the Miller reference was not relied upon by the board. … To the same effect is a later decision by the Commissioner •of Patents in the case of Haight v. Nell, 354 O. G. 247 ,1927 C. D. 4.

Petru American Importing Co. v. United States

1 Ct. Cust. 106 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 30, 1910

The Board of General Appraisers overruled the protest and sustained the assessment. The case is brought here for review. … Merchandise very similar in its composition to some of that involved in this case was considered by the court of appeals in Hazard v. United States (175 Fed. Rep., 967).

Tower & Sons v. United States

10 Ct. Cust. 259 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 4, 1921

D. 25235), an appeal was taken by the Government to the circuit court, which reversed the board and sustained the collectors’ classification.—United States v. McGettrick ( 139 Fed., 304 ). … The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is reversed.

Application of Annette E. Fridolph

309 F.2d 509 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 14, 1962

We think the board correctly decided that it would. … The sheaves were so positioned as to form grooves to fit V-•shaped belts.

Joseph & Feiss Co. v. Sportempos, Inc.

451 F.2d 1402 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 30, 1971

This is an appeal from a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board summarily dismissing, on motion, the opposition of appellant, *743 The Joseph. & Feiss Company. … Corp. v. J.

Fritz v. Hawn

37 F.2d 430 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Feb 6, 1930

It was expressed by Smith, J., in Larson v. Crowther, 55 App. D. … Winslow v. Austin, 14 App. D. C. 137, 143, 144.” To the same effect are Sendelbach v. Gillette, 22 App. D. C. 168; Gallagher v. Hastings, 21 App. D. C. 88; Laughlin v. Burry, 50 App. D. C. 273, 270 F. 1013 ; Miller v.

Application of Charles L. Cormany, William R. Dial and Blaine O. Pray

407 F.2d 900 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 6, 1969

Fessenden v. Coe, 1938 CD 62; 495 OG 707; 99 F.2d 426 [ 69 App.D.C. 193 ]; In re Atwood, 46 CCPA 901; 1959 CD 321; 747 OG 4; 267 F.2d 954 ; 122 USPQ 378 . … Appellants advance several arguments in support of their contention that the board erred.

United States v. Redden

13 Ct. Cust. 224 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 4, 1925

The board, in its opinion, did not discuss the question of commercial designation. … Goldsmith’s Sons v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 69 , T. D. 40932. We find nothing in the cases cited by the importer that is at variance with the conclusion we reach.

In Re Ackenbach

45 F.2d 437 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 19, 1930

Carnegie Steel Co. v. … App.) 40 F.(2d) 765 ; Diamond Rubber Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co., 220 U. S. 428 , 31 S. Ct. 444 , 55 L. Ed. 527 . The decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed. Affirmed.

Harlan v. Bregman

39 F.2d 494 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 10, 1930

(Seaberger v. Russell, 121 O. G. 2328 ; Rose v. Clifford & Newell, 135 O. G. 1361 ; Rolfe v. Kaisling v. Leeper, 143 O. G. 562 ; Walker v. Lederer, 179 O. G. 851 ; Hubbard v. Berg, 195 O. G. 818 ; Roe v. Hansom, 99 O. … G. 2550 ; Wyman v. Donnelly, 104 O. G. 310 .)

Hagen v. Cords

88 F.2d 998 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 5, 1937

The rings are placed in the piston groove in such manner as to have two or more of the segments having the dished faces in opposition so as to form V-shaped channels or clearances. … The board’s decision is affirmed.