Case law

San Fernando Electric Mfg. Co. v. JFD Electronics Components Corp.

565 F.2d 683 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 23, 1977

Sales of capacitors under its above mark in the period of 1970-75, as found by the board, were in excess of $35 million. … Wella Corp. v. California Concept Corp., 558 F.2d 1019, 1021-22 , 194 USPQ 419, 421-22 (Cust. & Pat.App.1977); Contour Chair-Lounge Co. v.

Wimpeheimer v. United States

12 Ct. Cust. 546 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 6, 1925

The board overruled the protest and the importer appealed. … —Cruger’s (Inc.) v. United States ( 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 516 ; T. D. 40730), decided concurrently herewith.

In re Davies

475 F.2d 667 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 5, 1973

The board objected to much of this evidence on technical grounds. … See Martin v. Johnson, 59 CCPA 769, 454 F.2d 746 , 172 USPQ 391 (1972).

Application of the Pollak Steel Company

314 F.2d 566 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 13, 1963

The board did reconsider and reaffirmed its original decision on December 8,1961. … On the matter of making advertising expenditures under a wrong theory of the legal situation, see our recent opinion in Weiss Noodle Company v. Golden Cracknel and Speciality Company, 290 F.2d 845 , 48 CCPA 1004.

Application of Douglas J. Bridgeford

357 F.2d 679 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 9, 1966

In Robeson this court pointed out it was not apparent that Congress, in enacting the terminal *682 disclaimer provision of 85 U.S.C. 253, had abandoned the principles found in Miller v. Eagle Mfg. … Co., 151 U.S. 186 , 14 S.Ct. 310 , 38 L.Ed. 121 (1894) and Underwood v. Gerber, 149 U.S. 224 , 13 S.Ct. 854 , 37 L.Ed. 710 (1893).

Ernest D. Garrett v. Joseph B. Cox

233 F.2d 343 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 15, 1956

Lichtenwalter v. Caron, 158 F.2d 1011 , 34 C.C.P.A., Patents, 792. … Gowen v. Hendry, 37 F.2d 426 , 17 C.C.P.A., Patents, 789, and Urschel v. Crawford, 73 F.2d 510 , 22 C.C.P.A., Patents, 727, and cases there cited.

In Re Thuau

135 F.2d 344 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Apr 5, 1943

Regar & Sons, Inc., v. … Notwithstanding the foregoing the board affirmed the decision of the examiner.

Application of Calvin M. Hammack

427 F.2d 1378 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jul 2, 1970

Compare United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co., 317 U.S. 228 , 63 S.Ct. 165 , 87 L.Ed. 232 (1942), Kaiser Industries Corp. v. McLouth Steel Corp., 400 F.2d 36 (6th Cir. 1968). … We therefore find it unnecessary to discuss this comment but rely on the other reasons for indefiniteness given by the examiner and board. 3 .

Hendrickson & Nelson v. Ronning & Ronning

76 F.2d 137 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 25, 1935

Upon appeal, the Board of Appeals affirmed this decision. … Hayes v. Davison, 50 App. D. C. 361, 273 F. 325 ; Earles et al. v. Gomber, 50 App. D. C. 389, 273 F. 353 ; Leonard v. Everett, 52 App. D. C. 90, 281 F. 594 ; Chapman v. Beede, 54 App. D.

Dale v. United States

2 Ct. Cust. 384 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 19, 1911

In Knauth v. United States ( 1 Ct. Cust. Appls., 334 ; T. … Nix v. Hedden ( 149 U. S., 304 ). The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.

Application of Walker

213 F.2d 332 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 27, 1954

Federal Yeast Corporation v. Fleischmann Co., 351 O.G. 3 ; [4 Cir.], 13 F.2d 570 . … Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis, etc., Co., 1926, 270 U.S. 390 , 46 S.Ct. 324 , 70 L.Ed. 651 ; In re Downs, 45 F.2d 251 ; 18 C.C.P.A., Patents, 803.

Application of Ralph G. H. Siu

222 F.2d 267 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 25, 1955

See Underwood v. Gerber, 1893, C.D. 340; 630 O.G. 1063 , 149 U.S. 224 , 13 S.Ct. 854 , 37 L.Ed. 710 . … Nothing in the statute or its legislative history suggests abandonment of the settled rule of Underwood v.

Hague & Co. v. United States

7 Ct. Cust. 75 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 1, 1916

The words “composed wholly of” were considered in Schiff & Co. v. United States ( 140 Fed., 63 ), affirmed in United States v. … The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.

Noxon v. Potts

102 F.2d 836 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Mar 27, 1939

Potts (No. 3955), Salmon v. Potts (No. 3956), Bancroft v. Potts (No. 3957), and Griffith v. Potts (No. 3958), 25 C. C. P. A. … Noxon v. Potts and Franklin v. Potts, 25 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 859, 94 F. (2d) 388.

Blanchard Importing & Distributing Co., Inc. v. Societe E. Blanchard Et Fils

402 F.2d 797 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 14, 1968

Columbia Mill Co. v. Alcorn, 150 U.S. 460 [ 14 S.Ct. 151 , 37 L.Ed. 1144 ] (1893); American Foods, Inc. v. … California Piece [Dye] Works v. California Hand Prints, supra; Bellbrook Dairies v. Hawthorn-Mellody Farms Dairy, 253 F.2d 431 (C.C.P.A.1958); Krank v. Philippe, 295 F. 1001 (D.C.Cir. 1924); Lever Bros. Co. v.

Hitner Sons Co. v. United States

13 Ct. Cust. 216 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 4, 1922

Woodruff v. One Scow, 30 Fed. 269 ; Ruddiman v. Scow, 38 Fed. 158 . Floating dry docks have also been so held. Snyder v. Dry Dock, 22 Fed. 685 ; Berton v. Tietjen, etc., 219 Fed. 763 (771); Cope v. Vallette, 119 U. … The Board of General Appraisers held the Altenberg was a “vessel” when she entered the customs jurisdiction of the country and hence was not subject to customs duties. In Thayer v. United States, 2 Ct. Cust.

In re Wadsworth

107 F.2d 596 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Dec 4, 1939

The board reversed the examiner upon the rejection of claims 1 to 6, inclusive, upon the ground of unreasonable delay in applying for reissue, and these claims stand allowed; but as stated above, the board affirmed the rejection … claim in a reissue application (when similar claims have been rejected during the prosecution of the original application and such rejection was acquiesced in by the applicant) are set out at length in the case of Leggett v.

Josef Fried, David Perlman, Richard W. Thoma, and Elwood O. Titus v. Herbert C. Murray, and Durey H. Peterson

268 F.2d 223 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jun 30, 1959

This court in Den Beste v. … Trumbull v. Kirschbraun, 67 F.2d 974 , 21 C.C.P.A., Patents, 758; Blodgett and Hanson v. Richter, 79 F.2d 922 , 23 C.C.P.A., Patents, 749; Walsh v. Davidson, 101 F.2d 224 , 26 C.C.P.A., Patents, 812; Kyrides v.

Thurston v. Wulff

164 F.2d 612 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Nov 29, 1947

Collins v. Olsen, 102 F.2d 828 , 26 C.C.P.A. (Patents) 1017. … The board pointed out the particulars in which appellant’s proof has failed to meet the requirements of the law and we cannot express it any better than it is expressed in the board’s decision.

In re Kauffman

152 F.2d 991 · Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Jan 7, 1946

The first is the case of Lion Fastener, Inc. v. Hookless Fastener Co. … The other case so cited is Otis Elevator Co. v.