Case law

Allied Contractors, Inc. v. United States

124 F. Supp. 366 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1954

Fuller Co. v. United States, 108 C. Cls. 70 and the cases cited therein; Line Construction Co. v. United States, 109 C. Cls. 154 ; Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. United States, 111 C. Cls. 252 ; Rafael Torres, Jr. v. … Southeastern Oil Florida, Inc. v. United States, 127 C. Cls. 480 ; Cramp Shipbuilding Co. v. United States, 122 C. Cls. 72, 99 ; Continental Illinois National Bank v. United States, 121 C.

Shoshone Tribe of Indians of the Wind River Reservation v. United States

85 Ct. Cl. 331 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1937

In Holden v. … In Worcester v.

Ryan v. United States

56 Ct. Cl. 103 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 21, 1921

A board of examiners for the customs service at the port of New York had been created by the Civil Service Commission and regulations promulgated governing the examinations for appointment and for promotions in that service … We refer to the case of United States v. Garlinger, 169 U. S. 316 at 322 and cases cited.

Uniq Computer Corp. v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,852 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 23, 1990

See Celotex Corp. v. … Casebolt Co. v.

Ackerlind v. United States

49 Ct. Cl. 635 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 23, 1914

Hearne v. Marine Ins. Co., supra; Moffett v. Rochester, 178 U. S., 373 ; Lyman v. U. S. Ins. Co., 17 Johns, 377. For, as was expressed by Chief Justice Ames in Diman v. Providence Co., 5 R. … In Turnbull v.

Keene Corp. v. United States

12 Cl. Ct. 197 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1987

Corp. v. … See Brown v.

National Surety Corp. v. United States

102 Ct. Cl. 671 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 4, 1944

United States v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co ., 236 U. S. 512 ; Board of Education of City of Asbury Park v. Maryland Casualty Co. of Baltimore, Md., 27 Fed. (2d) 20; Continental Casualty Co. v. … See, also, The Philadelphia, Wilmington, and Baltimore Railroad Co. v. Howard, 13 How. 307, 339-341 ; United States v. Quinn, 99 U. S. 30, 32 ; United States v. O'Brien, 220 U.

Lolley v. United States

18 Cl. Ct. 498 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 18, 1989

Affidavit of Julie Lolley, Lolley v. HHS, No. 88-33V; Affidavit of Dan Lolley, Lolley v. HHS, No. 88-33V; see also Tr. at 46-47. … Crane is a board-certified pediatrician and has practiced in the field of pediatrics for the past 35 years. Johnathan was delivered and attended by Dr. Graham Rose, a partner of Dr. Crane. As such, Dr.

Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. United States

10 Cl. Ct. 486 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 18, 1986

He purchased slightly less than a controlling interest in Yuba’s stock directly from the company for $2 million and became chairman of the board and chief executive officer. Mr. … TVA v. Powelson, 319 U.S. 266 , 63 S.Ct. 1047 , 87 L.Ed. 1390 (1943); United States v. Sowards, 370 F.2d 87, 90 (10th Cir.1966); Foster v.

Waxman v. United States

112 F. Supp. 570 · United States Court of Claims · May 5, 1953

In the matter of Enjay Construction Company, decided November 18, 1948, by the War Contract Hardship Claims Board (4 CCF, para. 60, 588), the Board allowed as a necessary expense of performing the contracts, interest incurred … See Meister v.

Edward H. Meyer Construction Co. v. United States

124 Ct. Cl. 274 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 13, 1953

Grant Construction Company, et al., v. … These revisions are on the drafting board and as soon as they are ready for release you will be supplied with copies.

American-Hawaiian Steamship Co. v. United States

129 Ct. Cl. 365 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1954

United States v. Commodities Trading Corp., 339 U. S. 121,123 ; Olson v. United States, supra, p. 255; Monongahela Navigation Co., v. United States, 148 U. S. 312, 326 ; Boom Company v. Patterson, 98 U. S. 403, 407 . … Borland v. United States, 57 C.

Doko Farms v. United States

21 Cl. Ct. 696 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 30, 1990

Brown, 732 F.2d 345, 348 (3d Cir.1984) (fact that plaintiffs were defendants in state court action and are now plaintiffs in federal court not relevant in res judicata challenge); Davis v. … Corp. v.

Gordons Transports, Inc. v. United States

154 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1961

Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway v. United States, 118 Ct. Cl. 194, 200 . … Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Ry. v. United States, supra; Lever Bros. Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 164 F. (2d) 738, 739 (Ct. App. 4th); Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. State of Russia, 21 F. (2d) 396, 405 (C.C.A. 2d).

Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United States

9 Cl. Ct. 227 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 3, 1985

Clearly if the drafters had perceived it as necessary they could have required that the abandoned mines be filled in or boarded up. However, they included no such provision. … (G Bogert, supra, § 541) that he fill in or board up the mines.

Connecticut Valley Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

348 F.2d 949 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1965

Badowski v. United States, supra; Block v. Nathan Anklet Support Company, In c. 9 F. 2d 311 (2d Cir. 1925); Coffin v. Ogden, 85 U.S. (18 Wall.) 120 (1873). … He subsequently became vice-president and general manager and served as a member of the board of directors.

Blackfeet v. United States

81 Ct. Cl. 101 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 8, 1935

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 5 Pet. 1 . … United States, v. Winans, 198 U. S. 371 ; Choctaw Nation v. United States, 119 U. S. 1 .

Colorado State Bank of Walsh v. United States

18 Cl. Ct. 611 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1989

Co. v. United States, 591 F.2d at 672 . . Law v. United States, 195 Ct.Cl. 370, 441 (1971) (citing New York Market Gardeners’Ass’n v. United States, 43 Ct.Cl. 114, 138 (1908)). . See Brown v. … Emeco Indus., Inc. v. United States, 202 Ct.Cl. 1006 , 485 F.2d 652, 657 (1973); United States v. *633 Georgia Pacific Co., 421 F.2d 92, 96 (9th Cir. 1970). . Heckler v.

Weeks Dredging & Contracting, Inc. v. United States

33 Cont. Cas. Fed. 74,614 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 26, 1986

V. … Brown v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 409, 412 (1983). .

Gibbs Corp. v. United States

127 Ct. Cl. 280 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1954

Under the doctrine announced in Schaefer and Robbins v. United States, 114 C. Cls. 568, 570 , that act provides for suit after such finding has been made. … It is $25,471.76 less than the cost as originally represented, and appears to he reasonable and in conformity with the Keport of the Advisory Board on Just Compensation, dated December 7, 1943.