Case law

Dick v. United States

169 F. Supp. 491 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 14, 1959

United States v. Miller, 317 U. S. 369, 375 , et seq.; Aaronson v. United States, 79 F. 2d 139 ; United States v. River Rouge Improvement Co., 26, 9 U. S. 411 ; Reichelderfer v. Quinn, 287 U. S. 315, 323 . … The parties have stipulated that on November 25, 1957, the Board of County Commissioners approved the rezoning of such 1,526 feet frontage for a depth of 300 feet.

Roettinger v. United States

26 Ct. Cl. 391 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 8, 1891

(Ketchum v. Dun can, 96 U. S. R., 659 ). … In Harvey v.

Great Northern Railway Co. v. United States

178 Ct. Cl. 226 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1967

The pertinent portion of 38-F reads as follows: Powder, black, brown or smokeless, in boxes or kegs. … See Hughes Transportation., Inc., v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 63 (1965), citing Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. United States, 162 Ct. Cl. 233 (1963).

Rifkind v. United States

5 Cl. Ct. 362 · United States Court of Claims · May 30, 1984

In United States v. … Brown, Regulations, Reenactment, and the Revenue Acts, 54 Harv. L.Rev. 377, 383 (1941) (criticizing the judicial cannon of approval by reenactment).

Kelley v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,771 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1989

Murphy v. Texaco, Inc., 567 F.Supp. 910, 912-13 (N.D.Ill. 1983); cf. Vereka Investments, N.V. v. American Inv. … The interest provided for in this section shall be paid at the rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Public Law 92-41 ( 85 Stat. 97 ) for the Renegotiation Board.

Montana Bank of Circle, N.A. v. United States

7 Cl. Ct. 601 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 14, 1985

. *611 Hebah v. United States, 428 F.2d 1334, 1340 (Ct.Cl.1970); Deltec Corp. v. United States, 326 F.2d 1004 (Ct.Cl.1964); see also Bogart v. United States, 531 F.2d 988 (Ct.Cl.1976). … After Mitchell I, and United States v.

AABCO, Inc. v. United States

31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,346 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 11, 1983

FF-556 issued by the Interstate Commerce Commission, and it also complies with regulations of the Civil Aeronautics Board governing air freight forwarders. … Otis Elevator v.

St. Louis Bank for Cooperatives v. United States

624 F.2d 1041 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 18, 1980

Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 (1944); Brennan v. Great Am. Discount & Credit Co., supra note 20, at 297. Rev. Rul. 73-497,1973- 2 C.B. 18 . Case & Co. v. Board of Trade. 523 F.2d 355, 361 (7th Cir. 1975). … Atchinson, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. v. United States, 209 F Supp. 35, 42 (N D. Ill. 1962). Linnton Plywood Ass'n v. United States, 410 F. Supp. 1100, 1108 (D. Or 1976). Commissioner v.

W. T. Cowan, Inc. v. United States

127 F. Supp. 550 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 11, 1955

The Navy Department in a book called “The Machine Gun,” in chapter 14 of part V, described such a gun as a cannon. … On November 6,1944, the National Classification Board of Motor Carriers ruled that ammunition for 20-millimeter guns is “ammunition for cannon.”

Irving Berlin Music Corp. v. United States

487 F.2d 540 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1973

Co. v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 32 , 44-46, 475 F. 2d 612, 619-620 (1973). … IBrown v. Duchesne, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 183,194 (1856).] Cases cited, such as Kiesau Petroleum Corp., 42 BTA 69 (1940), Campbell v. Great Nat’l. Life Ins. Co., 219 F. 2d 693 (5th Cir. 1955), and Hopag, S.

Midwest Industrial Painting of Florida, Inc. v. United States

31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,962 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 9, 1983

See Ford Motor Co. v. Dallas Power & Light Co., 499 F.2d 400, 414-15 (5th Cir.1974); Alcoa Steamship Co. v. … V 1981) provides that the interest rate to be used is that established by the Secretary of the Treasury for the Renegotiation Board pursuant to Public Law 92-41 ( 85 Stat. 97 ).

Pikesville Home Builders, Inc. v. United States

160 Ct. Cl. 541 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1963

Huebschmann v. Grand Company, 166 Md. 615, 628 , 172 A. 227 ; State Roads Commission v. Franklin, 201 Md. 549 , 95 A. 2d 99 . On this particular point the defendant cites the case of Stanley Co. of America v. … It is a well recognized principle that ordinary words should be interpreted in the average everyday sense in which they are commonly used. *550 Hanover Bank v. Commissioner, 369 U.S. 672, 687 ; Crane v.

Coplin v. United States

6 Cl. Ct. 115 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 30, 1984

See, e.g., Johnson v. Browne, 205 U.S. 309 , 27 S.Ct. 539 , 51 L.Ed. 816 (1907); New York Indians, 170 U.S. 1 , 18 S.Ct. 531 , 42 L.Ed. 927 . … For example, the Commission is supervised by a board composed of nine members, four of whom must be Panamanian nationals proposed by Panama. Panama Canal Treaty aft. III(3)(a).

American National Bank & Trust Co. v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,966 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 13, 1990

Joseph Morton Co. v. … Bernice appealed this termination for default to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals. On December 28, 1982, its appeal was dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. .

Chase v. United States

50 Ct. Cl. 293 · United States Court of Claims · May 10, 1915

In Scott v. … To the same effect is Gilliland v. Schuyler, 9 Kans., 569 ; Todd v. Landry, 5 Martin (La.), 459; State v. Daley, 29 Conn., 273 ; Tivey v. People, 8 Mich., 128 ; McMinn v. Bliss, 31 Cal., 122 ; Hartung v. People, 22 N.

Overton v. United States

45 Ct. Cl. 17 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1909

To the same effect also are the cases of United States v Coombs ( 12 Pet., 72 ); Escanaba, etc., v. Chicago ( 107 U. S., 678 ); United States v. Gibson ( 166 U. S., 269, 271 ); United States v. … Gillespie v. Israel R.

Foreman v. United States

26 Cl. Ct. 553 · United States Court of Claims · May 29, 1992

Hendrix v. … Co. v.

Shanghai Power Co. v. United States

4 Cl. Ct. 237 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 30, 1983

See also Agins v. … See, e.g., National Board of Young Men’s Christian Associations v. United States, 395 U.S. 85 , 89 S.Ct. 1511 , 23 L.Ed.2d 117 (1969) (damage to buildings caused by efforts to quell rioting); Miller v.

Willems Industries, Inc. v. United States

295 F.2d 822 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 12, 1962

During September 1950, Jess Larson, Administrator of the General Services Administration (GSA) created the Emergency Procurement Service (EPS) within GSA and delegated to it authority he had received from the Munitions Board … Holmberg v. United States, 91 Ct.Cl. 501 .

Public Service Coordinated Transport v. The United States

367 F.2d 417 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 14, 1966

A passenger boarding such a bus at one street, corner in a suburban town can ride to. the next street corner or to some other *420 street corner within the same town, or to a street corner in another suburban town (if the … In this connection, the case of Gillette v. Rockland Coaches, 142 F.2d 616 (2nd Cir. 1944), is of special interest.