Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,266 results
0.25s
Estate of Davison v. United States
155 Ct. Cl. 290 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1961
The Board of Tax Appeals held for the taxpayer. … In Riegelman v.
Cited 8 timesPublished162 F. Supp. 403 · United States Court of Claims · May 7, 1958
Gerlach Live Stock Company v. United States, 111 C. Cls. 1 (1948), affirmed 339 U. S. 725 ; James J. Stevinson v. United States, 111 C. Cls. 89 (1948); East Side Canal Company, et al. v. United States, 111 C. … A 175,000 k. v. a. power plant will be located below the dam. A reregulating afterbay with a 50,000 k. v. a. power plant will be constructed below the Kennett Dam.
Cited 7 timesPublished12 Cl. Ct. 530 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 19, 1987
Miller v. … See Pratte v. National Labor Relations Board, 683 F.2d 1038, 1041 (7th Cir.1982) (estoppel applies if governmental actions amount to affirmative misconduct and four requirements met); TRW, Inc. v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedTechnograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. United States
372 F.2d 969 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 17, 1967
Davis, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff is the exclusive licensee of several patents relating to the manufacture of “printed circuit” boards for electrical apparatus. 1 Alleging that its patented invention … In Commissioner v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedRay Consolidated Copper Co. v. United States
59 Ct. Cl. 686 · United States Court of Claims · May 19, 1924
Pacific Hotel Co. v. Lieb., 83 Ill. 602 ; Chicago Union Traction Co. v. State Board of Equalisation, 112 Fed. 607 ; Henderson Bridge Co. v. Commonwealth, 99 Ky. 623 ; 166 U. S. 150 ; Security Co. v. … Hartford, 61 Conn. 89 -101; State v. Duluth Gas & Water Co., 76 Minn. 96 ; People v. Coleman, 126 N. Y. 433 ; Adams Express Co. v. Ohio, 166 U. S. 185 ; First National Bank v. Douglas Co., 124 Wis. 15 .
Cited 0 timesPublished305 F.2d 444 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 18, 1962
Compare Klein v. United States, No. 157-58, decided Jan. 18, 1961, and Davis v. … See, e. g., Bacon v. United States, Ct. Cl., 1961, 295 F.2d 936 ; Wilson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedYosemite Park v. United States
686 F.2d 925 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 11, 1982
See Haig v. Agee, 453 U.S. 280, 300-01 (1981); Estate of Sanford v. Commissioner, 308 U.S. 39, 44 (1939); Cohen v. United States, 181 Ct. Cl. 400, 406 , 384 F.2d 1001, 1004 (1967); Kleinfelter v. United States, 162 Ct. … Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 352 (1943) (California marketing program for raisins). In Goldfarb v.
Cited 7 timesPublished633 F.2d 945 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1980
Verrault v. United States, supra; Wathen v. United States, *555 208 Ct. Cl. 342 , 527 F. 2d 1191 (1975), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 821 (1976); West v. United States, supra; McKee v. United States, 205 Ct. … Effective January 1,1979, the Civil Service Commission was reorganized into the Merit Systems Protection Board and the Office of Personnel Management.
Cited 30 timesPublished6 Ct. Cl. 421 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1870
Roach, Griffith v. Williams, and Solita v. Yarrow, (named in this opinion.) … In Jackson v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedCircle K Corp. v. United States
23 Cl. Ct. 161 · United States Court of Claims · May 16, 1991
On January 12, 1983, plaintiff’s Board of Directors approved the sale of all 2,227,000 shares of its NuCorp stock to a third party for $.10 a share, totaling $227,000. … Booth Newspapers, Inc. v. United States, 303 F.2d 916 , 157 Ct.Cl. 886 (1962); Mansfield Journal Co. v. Commissioner, 274 F.2d 284 (6th Cir.1960).
Cited 2 timesPublished585 F.2d 1060 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 18, 1978
See Comm’r. v. LoBue, 351 U.S. 243 (1956). … See Comm’r. v. Anderson, 371 F. 2d 59, 64 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 906 (1967). In United States Junior Chamber of Commerce v. United States, 167 Ct.
Cited 13 timesPublishedTwin City Shipyard, Inc. v. United States
36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,952 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 11, 1990
BLH, Inc. v. United States, 13 Cl.Ct. 265, 272 (1987). … See, e.g., Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedBethlehem Steel Co. v. United States
53 Ct. Cl. 348 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 8, 1918
Loom Co. v. Higgins, 105 U. S., 580 . In Whipple v. Middlesex Co. (Fish Pat. … In Campbell v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWarchol Construction Co. v. United States
30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,088 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 21, 1983
Co. v. … Lehman, Inc. v.
Cited 18 timesPublished19 Cl. Ct. 590 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 26, 1990
See Johns-Manville Corp. v. … See Julius Goldman’s Egg City v.
Cited 1 timesPublished585 F.2d 1025 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 18, 1978
For example, in Piper v. … Aparacor, Inc. v. United States, supra, and Prairie Band of the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians v.
Cited 40 timesPublished24 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 3, 1888
(Andrews v. Lyons, 11 Allen, 349; Lonesberry v.Depew, 28 Barbour, 44; Water’s Appeal, 35 Pa. St., 523; Babcock v. Parry, 8 Ohio St., 270 ; State v. Pepper, 31 Ind., 76 ; Cape Ann Granite Co. v. U. S., 20 C. Cls. … {Perry on Trusts, §468; Barney v. Saunders, 16 Howard, 543 ; Martin v. Rayburn, 42 Ala., 468 .)
Cited 1 timesPublishedCircle K Corp. v. United States
23 Cl. Ct. 665 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 2, 1991
The original Order in this case, Circle K Corporation v. … On January 12, 1983, plaintiffs Board of Directors approved the sale of all 2,227,000 shares of its NuCorp stock to a third party for $.10 a share, totaling $227,000.
Cited 5 timesPublishedLiflans Corporation v. The United States
390 F.2d 965 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 16, 1968
Therefore, plaintiff’s board of directors in December 1955 authorized the issuance of $600,000 in eight percent debentures to be repaid in seven years. … This term, as defined in Gilbert v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedSun Cal, Inc. v. United States
37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,280 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1992
In Hawkinson v. … In Keydata, the court explained: Leases are not sufficiently different from other federal procurement contracts to call for a different policy across-the-board in the construction of their terms.
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna