Case law

Holloway Construction Co. v. United States

35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,732 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 11, 1989

Co. v. United States, Unpublished Opinion, No. 535-80C, filed December 27, 1985, at 2 (Holloway II). … Far from an individual harm, inflation strikes all contractors across-the-board. No sector of the economy is exempt from the vagaries of inflation.

Pawnee Tribe of Indians v. United States

56 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1920

The facts as to this item are set out in Finding V. … The charges were investigated by a board of inquiry, which, in its report of February 18,1878, stated there was some evidence to sustain the charges.

Anderson v. United States

201 Ct. Cl. 660 · United States Court of Claims · May 11, 1973

Female nursing assistants wore white cotton uniforms, with black or brown oxford shoes and beige hose. (b) Each nursing assistant was furnished six uniforms. … Baylor v. United States, supra; Bates v. United States, supra; Bowling v. United States, 181 Ct. Cl. 968 (1967).

Price v. United States

142 F. Supp. 455 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956

United States v. Isham, 17 Wall. 496, 506 ; Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U. S. 465, 469 ; Commissioner v. Tower, 327 U. S. 280 ; Chamberlin v. Commissioner, 207 F. 2d 462, 468 ; Zenz v. … Helvering v. Horst, 311 U. S. 112 ; Helvering v. Eubank, 311 U. S. 122 ; Harrison v. Schaffner, 312 U. S. 579; Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U. S. 591 .

Chickasaw Nation v. United States

22 Ct. Cl. 222 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1887

(Jackson v. United States, 19 C. Cls. R., 508 .) … On these points we are left in the, dark; but we find that Buckner was ready on time to perform the duty imposed upon him; that he was much delayed by the Ohicka-saws, who were irregular and dilatory in reporting on board

Union Pacific Railroad v. United States

524 F.2d 1343 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 22, 1975

Edwards v. Cuba R.R. is therefore not helpful. The remaining arguments of the parties are based on Detroit Edison Co. v. Commissioner, 319 U.S. 98 (1943) and Brown Shoe Co. v. … It was therefore a contribution to capital under Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R.R., supra, Brown Shoe and Edwards v. Cuba R.R., supra. See Federated Department Stores v.

Griffith v. United States

22 Ct. Cl. 165 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1887

{Martin v. Mott, 12 Wheat., 419 .) … (Page v. Bent, 43 Mass., 374 .)

Graham

118 Ct. Cl. 625 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1951

Immigration, and Naturalization Pay Oases On the authority of Gibney v. United States, 114 C. Cls. 38 , Taylor v. United States, 114 C. Cls. 59 , and Ahearn v. United States, 114 C. … Barker v. United States, 117 C.

White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United States

11 Cl. Ct. 614 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1987

Cappaert v. … any benefit from it except through the boarding school.

Economy Plumbing & Heating Co. v. United States

456 F.2d 713 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1972

United States v. Hack, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 271, 275 (1834). … In this connection, the case of Stuart v. Willis, 244 F. 2d 925 (9th Cir., 1951), is especially significant. In that case, John E. and Edith P.

Asco-Falcon II Shipping Co. v. United States

35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,745 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 31, 1989

See Oceanic Steamship Co. v. United States, 218 Ct.Cl. 87, 93-94 , 586 F.2d 774, 777 (1978); American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc. v. … Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 , 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1686 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90, 96 (1974); Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service, 846 F.2d 746, 747 (Fed.Cir.1988); Raymark Industries, Inc. v.

Safeway Stores, Inc. v. United States

159 Ct. Cl. 522 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1962

Koppers Co., Inc. v. United States, 133 Ct. Cl. 22 . … There will follow the signatures of Safeway, its principal executive, financial and accounting officers and at least a majority of its board of directors. * * * 12.

S. K. Jensen and Ethel B. Jensen v. The United States. Opal L. Jones, of the Estate of Carrie Carlton, A/K/A Catherine Carlton Franklin S. Carlton, Opal L. Jones Mona Marie Eyestone and Vann v. Jones v. The United States. Walter R. Burdge and Winston S. Wheeler, Co-Trustees v. The United States. Walter R. Burdge and Winston S. Wheeler, Co-Trustees v. The United States. C. A. McClaughry and Edith M. McClaughry v. The United States

305 F.2d 444 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 18, 1962

Compare Klein v. United States, No. 157-58, decided Jan. 18, 1961, and Davis v. … See, e. g., Bacon v. United States, Ct. Cl., 1961, 295 F.2d 936 ; Wilson v.

Blount Bros. Construction Co. v. United States

180 Ct. Cl. 35 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1967

Specialty Assembling & Packing Co. v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 153, 184 , 355 F. 2d 554, 572 (1966); Dale Constr. Co. v. United States, 168 Ct. Cl. 692, 729 (1964). … While the ascertainment of damages would normally require a remand to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, defendant, for reasons of practicality, consented to a resolution of the factual issues by the court.

Raines v. United States

12 Cl. Ct. 530 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 19, 1987

Miller v. … See Pratte v. National Labor Relations Board, 683 F.2d 1038, 1041 (7th Cir.1982) (estoppel applies if governmental actions amount to affirmative misconduct and four requirements met); TRW, Inc. v.

Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. United States

372 F.2d 969 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 17, 1967

Davis, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff is the exclusive licensee of several patents relating to the manufacture of “printed circuit” boards for electrical apparatus. 1 Alleging that its patented invention … In Commissioner v.

O. A. Kirkconnell, Jr., and W. J. Godfrey, D/B/A Kirkconnell & Godfrey v. The United States. Harris Falgout, Harris Falgout, Jr., Louella F. Lemkowitz and M. F. Callais, T/a Grande Valley Boat Company v. The United States

347 F.2d 260 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1965

Inc. v. … Inc., v.

W. E. Callahan Construction Co. v. United States

91 Ct. Cl. 538 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1940

In Rust Engineering Oo. v. … Bulkley v. United States, 19 Wall. 37, 40 . Milter v. United States, 49 C. Cls. 276, 282 ; Guastavino Co. v. United States, 50 C. Cls. 115, 119 . The case of U. S. F. & G. Co. v. United States, 53 C.

Yosemite Park v. United States

686 F.2d 925 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 11, 1982

See Haig v. Agee, 453 U.S. 280, 300-01 (1981); Estate of Sanford v. Commissioner, 308 U.S. 39, 44 (1939); Cohen v. United States, 181 Ct. Cl. 400, 406 , 384 F.2d 1001, 1004 (1967); Kleinfelter v. United States, 162 Ct. … Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 352 (1943) (California marketing program for raisins). In Goldfarb v.

Schaefer v. United States

633 F.2d 945 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1980

Verrault v. United States, supra; Wathen v. United States, *555 208 Ct. Cl. 342 , 527 F. 2d 1191 (1975), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 821 (1976); West v. United States, supra; McKee v. United States, 205 Ct. … Effective January 1,1979, the Civil Service Commission was reorganized into the Merit Systems Protection Board and the Office of Personnel Management.