Case law

Moorland Court, Inc. v. The United States

357 F.2d 362 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 18, 1966

Burk-hardt v. United States, 84 F.Supp. 553 , 113 Ct.Cl. 658 (1949). … FHA took the position that since it was not clear that there was then a legally constituted board *365 of directors authorized to act for plaintiff, nor clear who were the legal officers of plaintiff, that FHA should not

Vanderslice v. United States

19 Ct. Cl. 480 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 28, 1884

legal methods an officer goes out of the service by the act of the President, whether by his approval of a sentence by a court-martial, his acceptance of a voluntary resignation, or his approval of the finding of a retiring board … Knote v. United States ( 95 U. S. R., 149 ).

Chickasaw Nation v. United States

22 Ct. Cl. 222 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1887

(Jackson v. United States, 19 C. Cls. R., 508 .) … On these points we are left in the, dark; but we find that Buckner was ready on time to perform the duty imposed upon him; that he was much delayed by the Ohicka-saws, who were irregular and dilatory in reporting on board

Pawnee Tribe of Indians v. United States

56 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1920

The facts as to this item are set out in Finding V. … The charges were investigated by a board of inquiry, which, in its report of February 18,1878, stated there was some evidence to sustain the charges.

T. O. F. C., Inc. v. United States

683 F.2d 389 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 30, 1982

T.O.F.C., Inc. v. Erie L. Ry., 643 F.2d 1227, 1229 (6th Cir. 1981). . T.O.F.C., Inc. v. United States, Ct. Cl., - F.2d - No. 207-81C (order entered Oct. 23, 1981). . Regional Rail Reorganization Act Cases, Blanchette v. … R. v. Mottley, 219 U.S. 467, 484 , 31 S.Ct. 265, 271 , 55 L.Ed. 297 (1911). . Hooten v. United States, 405 F.2d 1167 (5th Cir. 1969). . Id. at 1169 .

Economic Development & Industrial Corp. v. United States

11 Cl. Ct. 682 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 9, 1987

States v. … United States v. City of Jackson, 318 F.2d 1, 8 (5th Cir.1963); United States v. Madison County Board of Education, 219 F.Supp. 60, 61 (N.D.

Holloway Construction Co. v. United States

35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,732 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 11, 1989

Co. v. United States, Unpublished Opinion, No. 535-80C, filed December 27, 1985, at 2 (Holloway II). … Far from an individual harm, inflation strikes all contractors across-the-board. No sector of the economy is exempt from the vagaries of inflation.

Orrell v. United States

138 F. Supp. 861 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1956

Sometime after the pier was completed, a stair well was placed in the ell at its southern end, with steps leading to a fixed platform usable for landing from, boarding,, or anchoring a small boat. 3. … On January 19,1943, there was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern Division of North Carolina a petition captioned “United States v. 8.04 Acres of Land, et al., Civil No. 165.”

Rosenberg v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 432 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 16, 1983

In Fehrs v. … See Campbell v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 661, 670-71 , 661 F.2d 209, 215 (1981); Estate of Bird v. United States, 534 F.2d 1214, 1218 (6th Cir. 1976); McCormac v.

Barcroft Lake Shores, Inc. v. United States

135 Ct. Cl. 623 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956

Garrity v. United States, 107 C. Cls. 92 . The plaintiff asserts that during the 2-year period the value of the property increased some sixfold. … Dockser is chairman of the board of directors and secretary-treasurer of Lake Barcroft Estates, Inc., and Barcroft Lake Shores, Inc. He is president and chairman of the board of Fairfax Beach and Tennis Club, Inc.

Price v. United States

142 F. Supp. 455 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956

United States v. Isham, 17 Wall. 496, 506 ; Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U. S. 465, 469 ; Commissioner v. Tower, 327 U. S. 280 ; Chamberlin v. Commissioner, 207 F. 2d 462, 468 ; Zenz v. … Helvering v. Horst, 311 U. S. 112 ; Helvering v. Eubank, 311 U. S. 122 ; Harrison v. Schaffner, 312 U. S. 579; Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U. S. 591 .

Butz Engineering Corp. v. United States

499 F.2d 619 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 19, 1974

See Cherry Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United States, supra; Acron Investments, Inc. v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp., supra; Kormam, v. FHA, supra; Greider v. Woods, supra. … Cir. 1973), in which the court comments, at 771, that the sue-and-be-sued clause is a provision common to “administrative agencies” such as the Federal Reserve Board, ICC, FTC, NLRB and SBC, for whose actions the united States

Ordnance Engineering Corp. v. United States

68 Ct. Cl. 301 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 10, 1929

The following syllabus from the case of Canda v. … Zeidler v. United States, 61 C. Cls. 537 ; Allgrunn v. United States, decided by this court June 18, 1928. [ 67 C. Cls. 1 .]

Tumminello v. United States

14 Cl. Ct. 693 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 25, 1988

See Riojas v. Seal Produce, Inc., 82 F.R.D. 613, 616 (S.D.Tex.1979); Burgett v. Cudahy Co., 361 F.Supp. 617, 622 (D.Kan.1973); Shain v. … Was there an announcement on the bulletin board, or—how was this done? MR. HENDERSON: I don’t have the slightest idea.

Adams v. United States

20 Cl. Ct. 542 · United States Court of Claims · May 31, 1990

Phillips v. United States, 11 Cl.Ct. 155, 156 (1986). … United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 3 , 89 S.Ct. 1501, 1502 , 23 L.Ed.2d 52 (1963); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 100 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Curry v.

Riggs v. United States

21 Cl. Ct. 664 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 23, 1990

Without passing an assignment board the operators would run the risk of not being on time at their locomotives.” Id. … In Lindow v.

Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United States

314 F.2d 501 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1963

Corp. v. United States, 278 F.2d 217, 218 (C.A. 2, 1960) (cf. Salem Products Corp. v. United States, 298 F. 2d 808, 810 (C.A. 2, 1962)); Kenny Constr. Co. v. … to horizontal rafters by nailing through the vertical boards without other vertical support to the rafters.

Hazeltine Corp. v. United States

10 Cl. Ct. 417 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1986

First National Bank of Louisa, Ky. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 241, 244 (1984). See, e.g., Vickars-Henry Corp. v. Board of Governors, 629 F.2d 629, 635 (9th Cir.1986). … See Brown-Bridge Mills v. Eastern Fine Paper, 700 F.2d 759 , 766, 217 USPQ 651 (1st Cir.1983).

Appalachian Power Co. v. United States

607 F.2d 935 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 17, 1979

United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co., 229 U.S. 53 (1913); Louisville Bridge Co. v. United States, 242 U.S. 409 (1917). … E.g., Macke Co. v. United States, 199 Ct. Cl. 552 , 467 F.2d 1323 (1972); Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. United States, 198 Ct. Cl. 106 , 458 F.2d 994 (1972); Reil v. United States, 197 Ct.

Oak Forest, Inc. v. United States

26 Cl. Ct. 1397 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 15, 1992

Id. at v. … Martin v.